Herrera-Pérez Mario, González-Martín David, Sanz Emilio J, Pais-Brito José L
Department of Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Canary Islands, 38320 Tenerife, Spain.
Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad de La Laguna, 38320 Tenerife, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2022 Mar 27;11(7):1851. doi: 10.3390/jcm11071851.
Hip fracture is the most feared complication of osteoporosis, producing up to 30% mortality at the first year. With the aging of society, it is increasingly common to deal with ethical dilemmas that involve decision making in the elderly patient with a hip fracture. The objectives of the present work are to describe the main bioethical dilemmas in this group of patients and their relationship with surgical delay. We conducted a retrospective descriptive study that studied an elderly population admitted to a University Hospital with a diagnosis of hip fracture. In total, 415 patients were analyzed. The majority received surgical treatment, a correct application of the principles of justice, non-maleficence and beneficence is verified, but a possible violation of the principle of autonomy is confirmed. Based on the results of this study, the elderly population may somehow lose their principle of autonomy when they enter a hospital due to a hip fracture. On the other hand, the so-called ageism due to ignorance can influence the surgical delay and therefore the mortality of these patients.
髋部骨折是骨质疏松症最可怕的并发症,在第一年可导致高达30%的死亡率。随着社会老龄化,处理涉及老年髋部骨折患者决策的伦理困境越来越常见。本研究的目的是描述这类患者的主要生物伦理困境及其与手术延迟的关系。我们进行了一项回顾性描述性研究,研究对象为一所大学医院收治的诊断为髋部骨折的老年人群。总共分析了415例患者。大多数患者接受了手术治疗,证实了正义、不伤害和行善原则的正确应用,但也证实了可能违反自主原则的情况。基于本研究结果,老年人群因髋部骨折入院时可能会在某种程度上丧失自主原则。另一方面,由于无知导致的所谓年龄歧视会影响手术延迟,进而影响这些患者的死亡率。