• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Embolic Protection with the TriGuard 3 System in Nonagenarian Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重主动脉狭窄的高龄患者中使用TriGuard 3系统进行栓塞保护
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 2;11(7):2003. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072003.
2
Clinical Outcome of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With TriGUARD 3™ Cerebral Embolic Protection Device.使用TriGUARD 3™脑栓塞保护装置进行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的临床结果
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2023 May;50:8-12. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2023.01.008. Epub 2023 Jan 16.
3
Exploring the Difference in Post-procedural Stroke Rates Between Patients with Aortic Stenosis Who Undergo Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement.探索接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术与外科主动脉瓣置换术的主动脉瓣狭窄患者术后中风发生率的差异。
Cureus. 2018 Apr 17;10(4):e2494. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2494.
4
Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术中的脑栓塞保护。
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2022 Mar;36:9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
The Impact of Cerebral Embolic Protection Devices on Characteristics and Outcomes of Stroke Complicating TAVR.经心脏瓣膜置换术(TAVR)并发卒中的特征和结局受脑保护装置影响。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024 Mar 11;17(5):666-677. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2023.12.033.
6
TriGuard HDH embolic deflection device for cerebral protection during transcatheter aortic valve replacement.用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术中脑保护的TriGuard HDH栓子偏转装置。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Feb 15;89(3):470-477. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26566. Epub 2016 Apr 28.
7
Comparative meta-analysis of balloon-expandable and self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement.经导管主动脉瓣置换术使用球囊扩张式瓣膜与自膨胀式瓣膜的比较荟萃分析
Int J Cardiol. 2015 Oct 15;197:87-97. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.06.002. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Embolic protection in patients undergoing transaortic transcatheter aortic valve replacement: initial experience with the TriGuard HDH embolic deflection device.经主动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者的栓塞保护:TriGuard HDH栓塞偏转装置的初步经验。
J Card Surg. 2016 Oct;31(10):617-622. doi: 10.1111/jocs.12822. Epub 2016 Aug 30.
9
Self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement is associated with frequent periprocedural stroke detected by diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging.经扩散加权磁共振成像检测,自膨式经导管主动脉瓣置换术与频繁的围手术期卒中相关。
J Cardiol. 2019 Jul;74(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
10
Alternative Access Versus Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Nonagenarians.非agenarians中经导管主动脉瓣置换术的替代入路与经股动脉入路对比
J Invasive Cardiol. 2019 Jun;31(6):171-175. Epub 2019 Apr 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Trends and Outcomes of Readmissions Following Post-Procedural Stroke in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair: Insights From the National Readmission Database (2016-2020).经导管缘对缘修复术后卒中患者再入院的趋势和结局:来自国家再入院数据库(2016 - 2020年)的见解
Cureus. 2025 Feb 4;17(2):e78512. doi: 10.7759/cureus.78512. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
The efficacy of different types of cerebral embolic protection device during transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中不同类型脑栓塞保护装置的疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Feb 23;11:1205943. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1205943. eCollection 2024.
3
Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices for patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: An updated meta-analysis.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者使用脑栓塞保护装置的安全性和有效性:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;6(7):e1391. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1391. eCollection 2023 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
Safety and efficacy of cerebral embolic protection devices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of in-hospital outcomes.经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者中使用脑栓塞保护装置的安全性和有效性:院内结局的荟萃分析。
Cardiovasc Interv Ther. 2022 Jul;37(3):549-557. doi: 10.1007/s12928-021-00823-1. Epub 2021 Nov 13.
2
Valve Academic Research Consortium 3: updated endpoint definitions for aortic valve clinical research.瓣膜学术研究联合会 3 期:主动脉瓣临床研究更新的终点定义。
Eur Heart J. 2021 May 14;42(19):1825-1857. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa799.
3
Randomized Evaluation of TriGuard 3 Cerebral Embolic Protection After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: REFLECT II.经导管主动脉瓣置换术后使用 TriGuard 3 脑保护装置的随机评估:REFLECT II 研究。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Mar 8;14(5):515-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.11.011. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
4
Outcomes 2 Years After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients at Low Surgical Risk.低手术风险患者经导管主动脉瓣置换术后 2 年的结果。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 9;77(9):1149-1161. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.052.
5
TAVR in nonagenarians: An analysis investigating safety, efficacy, symptomatic improvement, and long-term survival.经导管主动脉瓣置换术在 90 岁以上患者中的应用:安全性、疗效、症状改善和长期生存的分析研究。
J Cardiol. 2021 Jul;78(1):44-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2021.01.016. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
6
Meta-Analysis of Usefulness of Cerebral Embolic Protection During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.经导管主动脉瓣植入术中使用脑保护装置的有效性的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2021 May 1;146:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.01.023. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
7
Outcomes of surgical versus transcatheter aortic valve replacement in nonagenarians- a systematic review and meta-analysis.非agenarians中外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。 (注:这里“agenarians”有误,可能是“nonagenarians”即九旬老人之意,按纠正后词汇翻译的完整译文:九旬老人中外科手术与经导管主动脉瓣置换术的结局——一项系统评价和荟萃分析。)
J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2021 Jan 26;11(1):128-134. doi: 10.1080/20009666.2020.1843235.
8
The Use and Outcomes of Cerebral Protection Devices for Patients Undergoing Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Clinical Practice.临床实践中经股动脉经导管主动脉瓣置换术患者脑保护装置的使用及结果
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jan 25;14(2):161-168. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.047.
9
The West German Heart and Vascular Center at University Medicine Essen.埃森大学医学中心的西德心脏与血管中心。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Mar 7;42(10):963-964. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa980.
10
Longitudinal Outcomes of Nonagenarians Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.90 岁以上患者行经导管主动脉瓣置换术的纵向结局。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2021 May;111(5):1520-1528. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.06.140. Epub 2020 Sep 24.

在接受经导管主动脉瓣置换术治疗严重主动脉狭窄的高龄患者中使用TriGuard 3系统进行栓塞保护

Embolic Protection with the TriGuard 3 System in Nonagenarian Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis.

作者信息

Lind Alexander, Jánosi Rolf Alexander, Totzeck Matthias, Ruhparwar Arjang, Rassaf Tienush, Al-Rashid Fadi

机构信息

Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.

Department of Heart Surgery, West-German Heart and Vascular Center Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 2;11(7):2003. doi: 10.3390/jcm11072003.

DOI:10.3390/jcm11072003
PMID:35407611
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8999484/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) improves the survival and life quality of nonagenarian patients with aortic stenosis. Stroke remains one of the most worrisome complications following TAVR. Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) may reduce neurological complications after TAVR. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of CEPDs during TAVR in nonagenarian patients.

METHODS

Between January 2018 and October 2021, 869 patients underwent transfemoral TAVR (TF-TAVR) at our center. Of these, 51 (5.9%) patients were older than ninety years. In 33 consecutive nonagenarian patients, TF-TAVR was implanted without CEPDs using balloon-expandable valves (BEVs) and self-expandable valves (SEVs). Eighteen consecutive nonagenarians underwent TF-TAVR using a CEPD (CP group). Follow up period was in-hospital or 30 days after the procedure, respectively.

RESULTS

Minor access site complications occurred in two patients (3.9%) and were not CEPD-associated. Postinterventional delirium occurred in nine patients (17.6%). Periprocedural minor non-disabling stroke and delirium occurred in ten patients (19.6%). Periprocedural major fatal stroke occurred in two patients in the BEV group (3.9%). Two patients in the BEV group died due to postinterventional pneumonia with sepsis. The mortality rate was 7.8%. The results did not differ between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Age alone is no longer a contraindication for TAVR. CEPD using the Triguard 3 system in nonagenarian TAVR patients was feasible and safe and did not increase access site complications.

摘要

背景

经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)可提高非agenarian主动脉瓣狭窄患者的生存率和生活质量。中风仍然是TAVR术后最令人担忧的并发症之一。脑栓塞保护装置(CEPD)可能会减少TAVR术后的神经并发症。本研究评估了CEPD在非agenarian患者TAVR术中的安全性和有效性。

方法

2018年1月至2021年10月期间,869例患者在我们中心接受了经股动脉TAVR(TF-TAVR)。其中,51例(5.9%)患者年龄超过90岁。在33例连续的非agenarian患者中,使用球囊扩张瓣膜(BEV)和自膨胀瓣膜(SEV)进行TF-TAVR时未植入CEPD。18例连续的非agenarian患者使用CEPD进行了TF-TAVR(CP组)。随访期分别为住院期间或术后30天。

结果

2例患者(3.9%)出现轻微穿刺部位并发症,与CEPD无关。9例患者(17.6%)出现介入后谵妄。围手术期轻微非致残性中风和谵妄发生在10例患者(19.6%)中。BEV组有2例患者(3.9%)发生围手术期重大致命性中风。BEV组有2例患者因介入后肺炎合并败血症死亡。死亡率为7.8%。两组结果无差异。

结论

年龄本身不再是TAVR的禁忌症。在非agenarian TAVR患者中使用Triguard 3系统的CEPD是可行且安全的,不会增加穿刺部位并发症。