Sánchez Marcos, Cicero Sergio, Arrieta Sergio, Martínez Victor
LADICIM (Laboratory of Materials Science and Engineering), Universidad de Cantabria, E.T.S. de Ingenieros de Caminos, Canales y Puertos, Av/Los Castros 44, 39005 Santander, Spain.
Materials (Basel). 2022 Mar 23;15(7):2372. doi: 10.3390/ma15072372.
This paper provides a methodology for the prediction of fracture loads in additively manufactured ABS material containing U-notches. The approach is based on the Average Strain Energy Density (ASED) criterion, which assumes that the material being analysed develops fully linear-elastic behaviour. Thus, in those cases where the material has a certain (non-negligible) amount of non-linear behaviour, the ASED criterion needs to be corrected. In this sense, in this paper, the ASED criterion is also combined with the Equivalent Material Concept (EMC) and the Fictitious Material Concept (FMC), both being corrections in which the non-linear real material is substituted by a linear equivalent or fictitious material, respectively. The resulting methodologies have been applied to additively manufactured ABS U-notched single-edge-notched bending (SENB) specimens combining five different notch radii (0, 0.25, 0.5, 1 and 2 mm) and three different raster orientations (0/90, 45/-45 and 30/-60). The results obtained demonstrate that both the ASED-EMC and the ASED-FMC combined criteria provide more accurate predictions than those obtained directly through the ASED criterion, with the ASED-EMC criterion generally providing safe more accurate predictions, with an average deviation from the experimental fracture loads between +1.0% (predicted loads higher than experimental loads) and -7.6% (predicted loads lower than experimental loads).
本文提供了一种预测含U型缺口的增材制造ABS材料断裂载荷的方法。该方法基于平均应变能密度(ASED)准则,该准则假定所分析的材料呈现完全线弹性行为。因此,在材料具有一定(不可忽略)非线性行为的情况下,需要对ASED准则进行修正。从这个意义上讲,本文还将ASED准则与等效材料概念(EMC)和虚拟材料概念(FMC)相结合,这两种都是修正方法,其中非线性真实材料分别被线性等效材料或虚拟材料替代。所得方法已应用于增材制造的ABS U型缺口单边缺口弯曲(SENB)试样,这些试样结合了五种不同的缺口半径(0、0.25、0.5、1和2毫米)和三种不同的光栅取向(0/90、45/-45和30/-60)。获得的结果表明,ASED-EMC和ASED-FMC组合准则都比直接通过ASED准则获得的预测更准确,ASED-EMC准则通常提供更安全、更准确的预测,与实验断裂载荷的平均偏差在+1.0%(预测载荷高于实验载荷)和-7.6%(预测载荷低于实验载荷)之间。