Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, NTNU Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Department of Neurology and Clinical Neurophysiology, Norwegian Advisory Unit on Headache, St Olavs University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
J Headache Pain. 2022 Apr 12;23(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s10194-022-01402-2.
According to the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) study, headache disorders are among the most prevalent and disabling conditions worldwide. GBD builds on epidemiological studies (published and unpublished) which are notable for wide variations in both their methodologies and their prevalence estimates. Our first aim was to update the documentation of headache epidemiological studies, summarizing global prevalence estimates for all headache, migraine, tension-type headache (TTH) and headache on ≥15 days/month (H15+), comparing these with GBD estimates and exploring time trends and geographical variations. Our second aim was to analyse how methodological factors influenced prevalence estimates.
In a narrative review, all prevalence studies published until 2020, excluding those of clinic populations, were identified through a literature search. Prevalence data were extracted, along with those related to methodology, world region and publication year. Bivariate analyses (correlations or comparisons of means) and multiple linear regression (MLR) analyses were performed.
From 357 publications, the vast majority from high-income countries, the estimated global prevalence of active headache disorder was 52.0% (95%CI 48.9-55.4), of migraine 14.0% (12.9-15.2), of TTH 26.0% (22.7-29.5) and of H15+ 4.6% (3.9-5.5). These estimates were comparable with those of migraine and TTH in GBD2019, the most recent iteration, but higher for headache overall. Each day, 15.8% of the world's population had headache. MLR analyses explained less than 30% of the variation. Methodological factors contributing to variation, were publication year, sample size, inclusion of probable diagnoses, sub-population sampling (e.g., of health-care personnel), sampling method (random or not), screening question (neutral, or qualified in severity or presumed cause) and scope of enquiry (headache disorders only or multiple other conditions). With these taken into account, migraine prevalence estimates increased over the years, while estimates for all headache types varied between world regions.
The review confirms GBD in finding that headache disorders remain highly prevalent worldwide, and it identifies methodological factors explaining some of the large variation between study findings. These variations render uncertain both the increase in migraine prevalence estimates over time, and the geographical differences. More and better studies are needed in low- and middle-income countries.
根据全球疾病负担(GBD)研究,头痛障碍是全球最普遍和致残的疾病之一。GBD 建立在流行病学研究(已发表和未发表)的基础上,这些研究在方法学和患病率估计方面存在显著差异。我们的第一个目标是更新头痛流行病学研究的文献记录,总结所有头痛、偏头痛、紧张型头痛(TTH)和每月≥15 天头痛(H15+)的全球患病率估计值,将这些估计值与 GBD 估计值进行比较,并探讨时间趋势和地理差异。我们的第二个目标是分析方法因素如何影响患病率估计值。
在叙述性综述中,通过文献检索确定了截至 2020 年发表的所有排除诊所人群的患病率研究。提取了患病率数据以及与方法学、世界区域和出版年份相关的数据。进行了双变量分析(相关性或平均值比较)和多元线性回归(MLR)分析。
从 357 篇出版物中,绝大多数来自高收入国家,估计全球活跃头痛障碍的患病率为 52.0%(95%CI 48.9-55.4),偏头痛为 14.0%(12.9-15.2),TTH 为 26.0%(22.7-29.5),H15+为 4.6%(3.9-5.5)。这些估计值与 GBD2019 中偏头痛和 TTH 的估计值相当,但总体头痛的估计值更高。每天,世界上有 15.8%的人口患有头痛。MLR 分析仅解释了不到 30%的变化。导致变化的方法学因素包括出版年份、样本量、包括可能的诊断、亚人群抽样(例如医疗保健人员)、抽样方法(随机或非随机)、筛选问题(中立、严重程度或假定原因)以及调查范围(仅头痛障碍或其他多种疾病)。考虑到这些因素,偏头痛的患病率估计值逐年增加,而各种头痛类型的估计值在世界各地区之间存在差异。
该综述证实了 GBD 的发现,即头痛障碍在全球仍然高度普遍,并且确定了一些解释研究结果之间存在较大差异的方法学因素。这些差异使得偏头痛患病率估计值随时间的增加以及地理差异都不确定。低中收入国家需要更多和更好的研究。