Eira Nunes Cindy, Antonietti Jean-Philippe, Darwiche Joëlle
Developmental and Family Psychology Service, Faculty of Psychology and Education Sciences, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
FAmily and DevelOpment research center (FADO), Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
J Marital Fam Ther. 2022 Oct;48(4):998-1016. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12591. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
Following the task analysis method, this study aimed to confirm the relevance of our model of resolving coparenting dissatisfaction to differentiate between two contrasting couples undergoing couple therapy. The model under study described the steps through which couples resolve coparenting issues in couple therapy for parents. Two contrasting couples were selected from a sample of parents undergoing systemic couple therapy. We analyzed videotaped discussions about the couple's coparenting relationship to select one couple whose interaction quality improved after therapy and one couple who worsened. Records of therapy sessions were rated by two independent coders to verify whether the model of coparenting change was present. Results showed that the couple that improved after therapy presented almost all the steps of the model whereas the couple that worsened after therapy presented only two steps. This study supported the relevance of the model and its various components to discriminate between two contrasting cases.
遵循任务分析方法，本研究旨在确认我们解决共同养育不满模型的相关性，以区分接受夫妻治疗的两组截然不同的夫妻。所研究的模型描述了夫妻在针对父母的夫妻治疗中解决共同养育问题所经历的步骤。从接受系统性夫妻治疗的父母样本中选取了两组截然不同的夫妻。我们分析了关于夫妻共同养育关系的录像讨论，以选出一组治疗后互动质量提高的夫妻和一组治疗后互动质量恶化的夫妻。两名独立编码员对治疗记录进行评分，以验证共同养育变化模型是否存在。结果表明，治疗后情况改善的夫妻呈现出该模型的几乎所有步骤，而治疗后情况恶化的夫妻仅呈现出两个步骤。本研究支持了该模型及其各个组成部分在区分两个对比案例方面的相关性。
