Interocular Phase Disparity Tuning of Binocular Contrast Summation Depends on Carrier Spatial Frequency and Orientation.

SIGNIFICANCE

Binocular summation is a sensitive metric of binocular integration. As such, characterization of the mechanisms underlying binocular summation is a key step in translating and applying this knowledge to abnormal binocular systems afflicted with strabismus and amblyopia.

PURPOSE

Computational models of binocular summation have advocated the operation of mechanisms sensitive to the interocular phase disparity of first-order carrier gratings. This study investigated if such generalization depended on carrier spatial frequency and orientation.

METHODS

Monocular and binocular contrast detection thresholds were measured in nine observers with normal binocular vision. Stimuli comprised Gabor targets presented with one of three spatial frequencies (1, 3, and 9 cycles per degree [cpd]), two orientations (horizontal and vertical), and five interocular phase disparities (0, ± π /2, ± π radians). Horizontal and vertical fixation disparities were measured for each binocular threshold condition. Binocular summation ratios were computed by dividing the mean monocular detection threshold by the respective binocular detection threshold.

RESULTS

Binocular summation ratio varied significantly with interocular phase disparity for the 1- and 3-cpd horizontal and vertical gratings. Phase dependency was reduced with the 9-cpd horizontal grating and absent for the 9-cpd vertical grating, even though binocular summation ratio exceeded predictions of probability summation. Computational modeling that incorporated the variability of fixation disparity into a vector summation model predicted a reduction in peak binocular summation ratio with increasing carrier spatial frequency but did not account for the reduction of phase sensitivity noted with the 9-cpd stimulus.

CONCLUSIONS

Binocular summation magnitude is less dependent on interocular phase disparities for carrier spatial frequencies that exceed 3 cpd, especially with vertical gratings. Although vergence variability due to fixation disparities contributes to the overall reduction in binocular summation magnitude with increasing carrier spatial frequency, it does not provide a complete account for the lack of interocular phase disparity tuning noted with high grating spatial frequencies.