Schneider B, Moraglia G
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Percept Psychophys. 1992 Dec;52(6):639-60. doi: 10.3758/bf03211701.
Under certain conditions, the detection threshold for a sinusoidal grating embedded in a noisy background may be an order of magnitude lower when binocular cues are available than when monocular cues only are present. Such binocular unmasking occurs only when the degree of interocular disparity for the target differs from that of the background. Two classes of models have been advanced to account for such unmasking. The first assumes that orientation-specific, spatial frequency channels in each eye encode the amplitude and phase of the spatial frequency component of the pattern the channel is tuned to detect. Thus, a difference in interocular disparity between target and background could result in interocular amplitude and/or phase differences in left- and right-eye spatial frequency channels. When, however, there are no disparity differences between target and background, there will be no interocular differences in amplitude and phase in the left- and right-eye channels. In this model, then, binocular unmasking reflects the binocular system's ability to respond to interocular amplitude and/or phase differences in the patterns presented to the two eyes. In the second class of models, it is assumed that the left- and right-eye patterns are first summed to form a "Cyclopean" eye. In these models, detection depends on the effect this summation process has on the power spectrum of the summated patterns. To decide between these two classes of models, we observed the occurrence of binocular unmasking when (1) the contrast of masker and signal was varied identically in both eyes and (2) the contrast of masker and signal was varied in one eye only. Consistent with our previous research, we found that the results can be accounted for in terms of a linear summation model of binocular unmasking; the alternative interocular phase detection model was disproved. The implications of these findings for binocular contrast summation in the absence of visual noise are discussed.
在某些条件下,当存在双眼线索时,嵌入嘈杂背景中的正弦光栅的检测阈值可能比仅存在单眼线索时低一个数量级。这种双眼去掩蔽现象仅在目标的双眼视差程度与背景的双眼视差程度不同时才会出现。已经提出了两类模型来解释这种去掩蔽现象。第一类模型假设,每只眼睛中特定方向的空间频率通道对该通道调谐以检测的图案的空间频率分量的幅度和相位进行编码。因此,目标与背景之间的双眼视差差异可能导致左右眼空间频率通道中的双眼幅度和/或相位差异。然而,当目标与背景之间不存在视差差异时,左右眼通道中的幅度和相位将不存在双眼差异。那么,在这个模型中,双眼去掩蔽反映了双眼系统对呈现给两只眼睛的图案中的双眼幅度和/或相位差异做出反应的能力。在第二类模型中,假设左右眼图案首先相加形成一只“独眼巨人”眼。在这些模型中,检测取决于这种相加过程对相加图案的功率谱的影响。为了在这两类模型之间做出抉择,我们观察了在以下两种情况下双眼去掩蔽现象的发生:(1)双眼的掩蔽器和信号的对比度以相同方式变化;(2)仅在一只眼睛中改变掩蔽器和信号的对比度。与我们之前的研究一致,我们发现结果可以用双眼去掩蔽的线性相加模型来解释;另一种双眼相位检测模型被证伪。本文讨论了这些发现对于在没有视觉噪声情况下双眼对比度相加的意义。