Massenburg Benjamin B, Shepard Elizabeth, Mercan Ezgi, Nassar Amer, Birgfeld Craig B, Lee Amy, Ellenbogen Richard G, Hopper Richard A
From the Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, and Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Washington; Craniofacial Center, Seattle Children's Hospital; and University of Washington School of Medicine.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Jun 1;149(6):1165e-1175e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009143. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
It is important to determine whether sagittal synostosis-associated scaphocephaly is static in the presurgical period, or whether there are morphologic differences with time to include in surgical decision-making. The authors' purpose was to perform cross-sectional analysis of cranial morphology before any surgical intervention in children with sagittal synostosis younger than 9 months compared to matched controls.
The authors performed morphometric analysis on computed tomographic scans from 111 untreated isolated sagittal synostosis patients younger than 9 months and 37 age-matched normal controls. The authors divided the patients into three age groups and performed statistical comparison between sagittal synostosis and controls for each group.
Sagittal synostosis cephalic indices were stable and lower in patients than in controls across groups. Total cranial volume was equivalent, but sagittal synostosis patients had a greater posterior volume than controls at all ages and a smaller middle fossa volume at older ages. Pterional width was greater in sagittal synostosis patients than in controls for each age group. Frontal bossing vectors were most severe in the youngest age groups and least in the older group. Occipital protuberance was consistent across the age groups.
Upper parietal narrowing and occipital protuberance were the consistent deformities across age groups, with the most parietal constriction seen in older patients. Frontal bossing was not consistent and was more severe in the younger patients. The authors did not detect significant pterional constriction, and the appearance of constriction is relative to adjacent morphology and not absolute.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, II.
确定矢状缝早闭相关的舟状头畸形在术前阶段是否稳定,或者随着时间推移是否存在形态学差异以纳入手术决策非常重要。作者的目的是对9个月以下矢状缝早闭儿童在任何手术干预前的颅骨形态进行横断面分析,并与匹配的对照组进行比较。
作者对111例9个月以下未经治疗的孤立性矢状缝早闭患者和37例年龄匹配的正常对照的计算机断层扫描进行了形态测量分析。作者将患者分为三个年龄组,并对每组矢状缝早闭患者和对照组进行统计比较。
矢状缝早闭患者的头指数在各年龄组中均稳定且低于对照组。总颅容积相当,但矢状缝早闭患者在所有年龄段的后颅容积均大于对照组,在较大年龄时中颅窝容积小于对照组。各年龄组矢状缝早闭患者的翼点宽度均大于对照组。额部隆突向量在最年轻年龄组最为严重,在较年长组最轻。枕骨隆突在各年龄组中一致。
上顶骨狭窄和枕骨隆突是各年龄组一致的畸形,年长患者顶骨狭窄最明显。额部隆突不一致,在较年轻患者中更严重。作者未检测到明显的翼点狭窄,狭窄的外观是相对于相邻形态而言的,而非绝对的。
临床问题/证据水平:风险,II级。