Salehi Dehno Nasrin, Kamali Fahimeh, Shariat Abdolhamid, Jaberzadeh Shapour
Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Student Research Committee, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Physical Therapy Department, School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Rehabilitation Sciences Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2022 Jun;31(6):106469. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2022.106469. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
To compare corticospinal excitability and transcallosal inhibition between contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) and ipsilesional M1. We also investigated the correlation between transcallosal inhibition and upper extremity motor behavior.
19 individuals with unilateral ischemic subacute stroke who had severe upper extremity impairment participated in this study. Corticospinal excitability was assessed by measuring the resting motor threshold, active motor threshold and motor evoked potential amplitude. Transcallosal inhibition was investigated by measuring the duration and depth of the ipsilateral silent period (ISP). The data from the two hemispheres were compared and the relationships of transcallosal inhibition with upper extremity motor impairment, grip strength and pinch strength were analyzed.
Resting motor threshold (p = 0.001) and active motor threshold (p = 0.001) were lower and motor evoked potential amplitude was higher (p = 0.001) in the contralesional M1 compared to the ipsilesional M1. However, there were no differences between the two M1s in ISP duration (p = 0.297) or ISP depth (p =0. 229). Transcallosal inhibition from the contralesional M1 was positively associated with motor impairment (ISP duration, p = 0.003; ISP depth, p = 0.017) and grip strength (ISP duration, p = 0.016; ISP depth, p = 0.045).
Symmetric transcallosal inhibition between hemispheres and positive association of transcallosal inhibition from contralesional M1 with upper extremity motor behavior indicate that recruitment of contralesional M1 may be necessary for recovery in patients with severe upper extremity impairment after subacute ischemic stroke.
比较对侧原发性运动皮层(M1)和同侧M1之间的皮质脊髓兴奋性和胼胝体抑制。我们还研究了胼胝体抑制与上肢运动行为之间的相关性。
19例患有严重上肢功能障碍的单侧缺血性亚急性卒中患者参与了本研究。通过测量静息运动阈值、主动运动阈值和运动诱发电位幅度来评估皮质脊髓兴奋性。通过测量同侧静息期(ISP)的持续时间和深度来研究胼胝体抑制。比较两个半球的数据,并分析胼胝体抑制与上肢运动障碍、握力和捏力之间的关系。
与同侧M1相比,对侧M1的静息运动阈值(p = 0.001)和主动运动阈值(p = 0.001)较低,运动诱发电位幅度较高(p = 0.001)。然而,两个M1在ISP持续时间(p = 0.297)或ISP深度(p = 0.229)方面没有差异。来自对侧M1的胼胝体抑制与运动障碍(ISP持续时间,p = 0.003;ISP深度,p = 0.017)和握力(ISP持续时间,p = 0.016;ISP深度,p = 0.045)呈正相关。
半球间对称的胼胝体抑制以及对侧M1的胼胝体抑制与上肢运动行为的正相关表明,对于亚急性缺血性卒中后严重上肢功能障碍的患者,对侧M1的募集可能是恢复所必需的。