College of Urban and Environmental Sciences, Key Laboratory for Earth Surface Processes of the Ministry of Education, Peking University, Beijing, China.
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement, LSCE/IPSL, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Université Paris-Saclay, Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Jul;28(13):4110-4123. doi: 10.1111/gcb.16201. Epub 2022 May 2.
The dominance of vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and soil water content (SWC) for plant water stress is still under debate. These two variables are strongly coupled and influenced by climatic drivers. The impacts of climatic drivers on the relationships between gross primary production (GPP) and water stress from VPD/SWC and the interaction between VPD and SWC are not fully understood. Here, applying statistical methods and extreme gradient boosting models-Shapley additive explanations framework to eddy-covariance observations from the global FLUXNET2015 data set, we found that the VPD-GPP relationship was strongly influenced by climatic interactions and that VPD was more important for plant water stress than SWC across most plant functional types when we removed the effect of main climatic drivers, e.g. air temperature, incoming shortwave radiation and wind speed. However, we found no evidence for a significant influence of elevated CO on stress alleviation, possibly because of the short duration of the records (approximately one decade). Additionally, the interactive effect between VPD and SWC differed from their individual effect. When SWC was high, the SHAP interaction value of SWC and VPD on GPP was decreased with increasing VPD, but when SWC was low, the trend was the opposite. Additionally, we revealed a threshold effect for VPD stress on GPP loss; above the threshold value, the stress on GPP was flattened off. Our results have important implications for independently identifying VPD and SWC limitations on plant productivity, which is meaningful for capturing the magnitude of ecosystem responses to water stress in dynamic global vegetation models.
蒸气压亏缺 (VPD) 和土壤水含量 (SWC) 对植物水分胁迫的主导作用仍存在争议。这两个变量是紧密相关的,并受到气候驱动因素的影响。气候驱动因素对 VPD/SWC 引起的净初级生产力 (GPP) 与水分胁迫之间关系以及 VPD 和 SWC 之间相互作用的影响尚未完全了解。在这里,我们应用统计方法和极端梯度提升模型-Shapley 加性解释框架,对来自全球 FLUXNET2015 数据集的涡度协方差观测数据进行了分析,结果发现 VPD-GPP 关系受到气候相互作用的强烈影响,并且当我们去除主要气候驱动因素(如空气温度、入射短波辐射和风速)的影响时,VPD 对植物水分胁迫的影响比 SWC 更为重要,尤其是在大多数植物功能类型中。然而,我们没有发现升高的 CO2 对缓解胁迫有显著影响的证据,这可能是因为记录的时间较短(约十年)。此外,VPD 和 SWC 之间的交互作用与它们各自的作用不同。当 SWC 较高时,随着 VPD 的增加,SWC 和 VPD 对 GPP 的 SHAP 交互值减小,但当 SWC 较低时,趋势则相反。此外,我们还揭示了 VPD 对 GPP 损失的胁迫存在阈值效应;超过阈值值后,GPP 受到的胁迫趋于平稳。我们的研究结果对于独立识别 VPD 和 SWC 对植物生产力的限制具有重要意义,这对于在动态全球植被模型中捕捉生态系统对水分胁迫响应的幅度具有重要意义。