Suppr超能文献

经腹与腹腔镜手术治疗腹直肌分离:并发症和复发率的系统评价和汇总分析。

Open Versus Laparoscopic Surgical Management of Rectus Diastasis: Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Complications and Recurrence Rates.

机构信息

Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada.

Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2022 Aug;46(8):1878-1885. doi: 10.1007/s00268-022-06550-9. Epub 2022 Apr 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rectus diastasis (RD) is defined as widening of the linea alba and laxity of the abdominal muscles. It can be treated via a wide array of both conservative and surgical modalities. Due to the quickly evolving nature of this field coupled with the multiple novel surgical modalities described recently, there is a need for an updated review of surgical techniques and a quantitative analysis of complications and recurrence rates.

METHODS

A systematic review of PUBMED and EMBASE databases was preformed to retrieve all clinical studies describing surgical management of RD. Pooled analyses were preformed to assess recurrence and complication rates after both open and laparoscopic RD repairs (after controlling for herniorrhaphy).

RESULTS

A total of 56 papers were included in this review. In patients who underwent both an RD and a herniorrhaphy, there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between open (0.86%) and laparoscopic repairs (1.6%) (p > 0.05). Similarly, in patients who underwent RD repair without a herniorrhaphy, there was no significant difference in recurrence rates between open (0.89%) and laparoscopic repairs (0%) (p > 0.05). The most common complications reported were seroma, skin dehiscence, hematoma/post-operative bleeding, and infection. After controlling for a herniorrhaphy, there were no significant difference in total complication rates between open and laparoscopic RD repair. The total complication rates in patients who underwent an open RD repair with a herniorrhaphy were 13.3% compared to 14.5% in patients who underwent laparoscopic repairs (p > 0.05). Similarly, the total complication rates in patients who underwent RD repair without a herniorrhaphy were 11.8% in patients who underwent open repairs compared to 16.2% in their counterparts who underwent laparoscopic repairs (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Both open and laparoscopic approaches are safe and effective in repairing RD in patients with and without concurrent herniorrhaphy. Future research should report patient reported outcomes to better differentiate between different surgical approaches.

摘要

背景

腹直肌分离(RD)定义为白线增宽和腹部肌肉松弛。它可以通过广泛的保守和手术治疗。由于该领域的快速发展以及最近描述的多种新的手术方法,因此需要对手术技术进行更新的评估,并对并发症和复发率进行定量分析。

方法

对 PUBMED 和 EMBASE 数据库进行系统检索,以检索所有描述 RD 手术治疗的临床研究。进行汇总分析以评估开放式和腹腔镜 RD 修复后的复发率和并发症率(在控制疝修补术的情况下)。

结果

本综述共纳入 56 篇论文。在同时行 RD 和疝修补术的患者中,开放式(0.86%)和腹腔镜修复(1.6%)的复发率无显著差异(p>0.05)。同样,在未行疝修补术而行 RD 修复的患者中,开放式(0.89%)和腹腔镜修复(0%)的复发率无显著差异(p>0.05)。报告的最常见并发症是血清肿、皮肤裂开、血肿/术后出血和感染。在控制疝修补术的情况下,开放式和腹腔镜 RD 修复的总并发症发生率无显著差异。行开放式 RD 修复+疝修补术的患者总并发症发生率为 13.3%,而行腹腔镜修复的患者为 14.5%(p>0.05)。同样,未行疝修补术而行 RD 修复的患者中,行开放式修复的患者总并发症发生率为 11.8%,而行腹腔镜修复的患者为 16.2%(p>0.05)。

结论

开放式和腹腔镜方法在治疗合并和不合并疝修补术的 RD 患者中均安全有效。未来的研究应报告患者报告的结果,以更好地区分不同的手术方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验