• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过同步三维光学运动分析对用于估计时空步态参数的可穿戴足部传感器系统进行全面验证。

Comprehensive validation of a wearable foot sensor system for estimating spatiotemporal gait parameters by simultaneous three-dimensional optical motion analysis.

作者信息

Homan Kentaro, Yamamoto Keizo, Kadoya Ken, Ishida Naoki, Iwasaki Norimasa

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Kita 15, Nishi 7, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-8638, Japan.

School of Lifelong Sport, Hokusho University, 23 Bunkyodai, Ebetsu, 069-8511, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr 17;14(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00461-x.

DOI:10.1186/s13102-022-00461-x
PMID:35430808
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9013462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of a wearable gait analysis system (WGAS) is becoming common when conducting gait analysis studies due to its versatility. At the same time, its versatility raises a concern about its accuracy, because its calculations rely on assumptions embedded in its algorithms. The purpose of the present study was to validate twenty spatiotemporal gait parameters calculated by the WGAS by comparison with simultaneous measurements taken with an optical motion capture system (OMCS).

METHODS

Ten young healthy volunteers wore two inertial sensors of the commercially available WGAS, Physilog®, on their feet and 23 markers for the OMCS on the lower part of the body. The participants performed at least three sets of 10-m walk tests at their self-paced speed in the laboratory equipped with 12 high-speed digital cameras with embedded force plates. To measure repeatability, all participants returned for a second day of testing within two weeks.

RESULTS

Twenty gait parameters calculated by the WGAS had a significant correlation with the ones determined by the OMCS. Bland and Altman analysis showed that the between-device agreement for twenty gait parameters was within clinically acceptable limits. The validity of the gait parameters generated by the WGAS was found to be excellent except for two parameters, swing width and maximal heel clearance. The repeatability of the WGAS was excellent when measured between sessions.

CONCLUSION

The present study showed that spatiotemporal gait parameters estimated by the WGAS were reasonably accurate and repeatable in healthy young adults, providing a scientific basis for applying this system to clinical studies.

摘要

背景

由于其多功能性,在进行步态分析研究时,可穿戴步态分析系统(WGAS)的使用正变得越来越普遍。与此同时,其多功能性引发了对其准确性的担忧,因为其计算依赖于算法中嵌入的假设。本研究的目的是通过与光学运动捕捉系统(OMCS)同时进行的测量相比较,验证由WGAS计算得出的20个时空步态参数。

方法

10名年轻健康志愿者在双脚上佩戴市售WGAS(Physilog®)的两个惯性传感器,并在身体下部佩戴用于OMCS的23个标记物。参与者在配备有12台带嵌入式测力板的高速数码相机的实验室中,以自己选择的速度进行至少三组10米步行测试。为了测量重复性,所有参与者在两周内返回进行第二天的测试。

结果

由WGAS计算得出的20个步态参数与由OMCS确定的参数具有显著相关性。Bland和Altman分析表明,20个步态参数的设备间一致性在临床可接受范围内。除了摆动宽度和最大足跟间隙这两个参数外,发现由WGAS生成的步态参数的有效性非常好。在不同测试时段测量时,WGAS的重复性非常好。

结论

本研究表明,在健康的年轻成年人中,由WGAS估计的时空步态参数相当准确且可重复,为将该系统应用于临床研究提供了科学依据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/40c74e816f69/13102_2022_461_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/e974b4947506/13102_2022_461_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/027a183227d7/13102_2022_461_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/d44a5e2e8e39/13102_2022_461_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/40c74e816f69/13102_2022_461_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/e974b4947506/13102_2022_461_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/027a183227d7/13102_2022_461_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/d44a5e2e8e39/13102_2022_461_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/db5d/9013462/40c74e816f69/13102_2022_461_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Comprehensive validation of a wearable foot sensor system for estimating spatiotemporal gait parameters by simultaneous three-dimensional optical motion analysis.通过同步三维光学运动分析对用于估计时空步态参数的可穿戴足部传感器系统进行全面验证。
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2022 Apr 17;14(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s13102-022-00461-x.
2
Validation of an algorithm to assess regular and irregular gait using inertial sensors in healthy and stroke individuals.使用惯性传感器验证评估健康个体和脑卒中个体的正常和异常步态的算法。
PeerJ. 2023 Dec 15;11:e16641. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16641. eCollection 2023.
3
Validation of wearable inertial sensor-based gait analysis system for measurement of spatiotemporal parameters and lower extremity joint kinematics in sagittal plane.验证基于可穿戴惯性传感器的步态分析系统在矢状面测量时空参数和下肢关节运动学的准确性。
Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2022 May;236(5):686-696. doi: 10.1177/09544119211072971. Epub 2022 Jan 8.
4
Concurrent Validity of a Commercial Wireless Trunk Triaxial Accelerometer System for Gait Analysis.商用无线三轴向加速度计系统用于步态分析的同时效度。
J Sport Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1;28(6). doi: 10.1123/jsr.2018-0295.
5
Validation of shoe-worn Gait Up Physilog®5 wearable inertial sensors in adolescents.验证青少年鞋穿式 Gait Up Physilog®5 可穿戴惯性传感器。
Gait Posture. 2022 Jan;91:19-25. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.09.203. Epub 2021 Oct 5.
6
Validation of a Sensor-Based Gait Analysis System with a Gold-Standard Motion Capture System in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.基于传感器的步态分析系统与帕金森病患者金标准运动捕捉系统的验证。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 Nov 18;21(22):7680. doi: 10.3390/s21227680.
7
Agreement of spatio-temporal gait parameters between a vertical ground reaction force decomposition algorithm and a motion capture system.垂直地面反作用力分解算法与运动捕捉系统之间时空步态参数的一致性
Gait Posture. 2016 Jan;43:257-64. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
8
Validity and Reproducibility of Inertial Physilog Sensors for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Patients With Stroke.惯性生理传感器在脑卒中患者时空步态分析中的有效性和可重复性。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Sep;27(9):1865-1874. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2930751. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
9
Validity and repeatability of inertial measurement units for measuring gait parameters.用于测量步态参数的惯性测量单元的有效性和可重复性。
Gait Posture. 2017 Jun;55:87-93. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2017.04.013. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
10
Assessment of spatiotemporal gait parameters using a deep learning algorithm-based markerless motion capture system.使用基于深度学习算法的无标记运动捕捉系统评估时空步态参数。
J Biomech. 2021 Jun 9;122:110414. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2021.110414. Epub 2021 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
REEV SENSE IMUs for Gait Analysis in Stroke: A Clinical Study on Lower Limb Kinematics.用于中风步态分析的REEV SENSE惯性测量单元:一项关于下肢运动学的临床研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;25(16):5123. doi: 10.3390/s25165123.
2
Comparison of feetme insoles with a motion capture system coupled to force plates for assessing gait and posture.将feetme鞋垫与结合了测力板的动作捕捉系统进行比较,以评估步态和姿势。
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 18;15(1):13476. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-96878-8.
3
Assessment of the reproducibility and accuracy of the Visia Complexion Analysis Camera System for objective skin analysis of facial wrinkles and skin age.

本文引用的文献

1
Age and sex differences in normative gait patterns.年龄和性别对正常步态模式的影响。
Gait Posture. 2021 Jul;88:109-115. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.05.014. Epub 2021 May 15.
2
Spatio-temporal gait parameters obtained from foot-worn inertial sensors are reliable in healthy adults in single- and dual-task conditions.基于足部穿戴惯性传感器获得的时空步态参数在单任务和双任务条件下对健康成年人来说是可靠的。
Sci Rep. 2021 May 13;11(1):10229. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88794-4.
3
Effect of Low-Intensity vs High-Intensity Home-Based Walking Exercise on Walk Distance in Patients With Peripheral Artery Disease: The LITE Randomized Clinical Trial.
评估Visia肤色分析摄像系统用于面部皱纹和皮肤年龄客观皮肤分析的再现性和准确性。
GMS Interdiscip Plast Reconstr Surg DGPW. 2023 Oct 2;12:Doc07. doi: 10.3205/iprs000177. eCollection 2023.
4
The Use of Embedded IMU Insoles to Assess Gait Parameters: A Validation and Test-Retest Reliability Study.使用嵌入式 IMU 鞋垫评估步态参数:验证和重测可靠性研究。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Sep 28;23(19):8155. doi: 10.3390/s23198155.
低强度与高强度家庭步行运动对下肢动脉疾病患者步行距离的影响:LITE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Apr 6;325(13):1266-1276. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.2536.
4
Concurrent Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Sensitivity to Change of a Single Body-Fixed Sensor for Gait Analysis during Rollator-Assisted Walking in Acute Geriatric Patients.一种单一体固定传感器在助行器辅助急性老年患者行走时步态分析中的同步有效性、重测信度和变化敏感性。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Aug 28;20(17):4866. doi: 10.3390/s20174866.
5
Whole body kinematic sex differences persist across non-dimensional gait speeds.全身运动学性别差异在非维度步态速度上仍然存在。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 20;15(8):e0237449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237449. eCollection 2020.
6
Wearable-device-measured physical activity and future health risk.可穿戴设备测量的身体活动与未来健康风险。
Nat Med. 2020 Sep;26(9):1385-1391. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-1012-3. Epub 2020 Aug 17.
7
A multi-segment modelling approach for foot trajectory estimation using inertial sensors.基于惯性传感器的足部轨迹估计的多段建模方法。
Gait Posture. 2020 Jan;75:22-27. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2019.09.022. Epub 2019 Sep 22.
8
Validity of Mobility Lab (version 2) for gait assessment in young adults, older adults and Parkinson's disease.移动实验室(版本 2)在年轻人、老年人和帕金森病患者步态评估中的有效性。
Physiol Meas. 2019 Sep 30;40(9):095003. doi: 10.1088/1361-6579/ab4023.
9
Are Accelerometer-based Functional Outcome Assessments Feasible and Valid After Treatment for Lower Extremity Sarcomas?基于加速度计的功能结局评估在下肢肉瘤治疗后是否可行和有效?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Mar;478(3):482-503. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000883.
10
Validity and Reproducibility of Inertial Physilog Sensors for Spatiotemporal Gait Analysis in Patients With Stroke.惯性生理传感器在脑卒中患者时空步态分析中的有效性和可重复性。
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2019 Sep;27(9):1865-1874. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2019.2930751. Epub 2019 Jul 24.