Zu Meidan, Fu Lulan, Hu Mingwei, Cao Xiaoyan, Wang Long, Zhang Juan, Deng Ziru, Qiu Bensheng, Wang Yu
Department of Neurology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Department of Pediatrics, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Apr 1;13:847366. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.847366. eCollection 2022.
Generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS) are associated with significant disability and sudden unexpected death when they cannot be controlled. We aimed to explore the underlying neural substrate of the different responses to antiseizure drugs between the seizure-free (SF) and non-seizure-free (NSF) patients with GTCS through the amplitude of low-frequency fluctuation (ALFF) method.
We calculated ALFF among the SF group, NSF group, and healthy controls (HCs) by collecting resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) data. One-way ANOVA was used to compare the ALFF of the three groups, and analysis was done at the same time. Pearson's correlation analysis between ALFF in the discrepant brain areas and the clinical characteristics (disease course and age of onset of GTCS) was calculated after then.
A significant group effect was found in the right fusiform gyrus (R.FG), left fusiform gyrus (L.FG), left middle occipital gyrus (L.MOG), right inferior frontal gyrus (R.IFG), right precentral gyrus (R.PreG), right postcentral gyrus (R.PostG), and left calcarine sulcus (L.CS). The SF and NSF groups both showed increased ALFF in all discrepant brain areas compared to HCs except the R.IFG in the NSF group. Significantly higher ALFF in the bilateral FG and lower ALFF in the R.IFG were found in the NSF group compared to the SF group.
Higher ALFF in the bilateral FG were found in the NSF group compared to the SF and HC groups. Our findings indicate that abnormal brain activity in the FG may be one potential neural substrate to interpret the failure of seizure control in patients with GTCS.
全身性强直阵挛发作(GTCS)若无法得到控制,会导致严重残疾和意外猝死。我们旨在通过低频振幅(ALFF)方法,探究GTCS发作缓解(SF)和未缓解(NSF)患者对抗癫痫药物不同反应的潜在神经基质。
我们通过收集静息态功能磁共振成像(rs-fMRI)数据,计算了SF组、NSF组和健康对照组(HCs)的ALFF。采用单因素方差分析比较三组的ALFF,并同时进行分析。随后计算差异脑区的ALFF与临床特征(病程和GTCS发病年龄)之间的Pearson相关分析。
在右侧梭状回(R.FG)、左侧梭状回(L.FG)、左侧枕中回(L.MOG)、右侧额下回(R.IFG)、右侧中央前回(R.PreG)、右侧中央后回(R.PostG)和左侧距状沟(L.CS)发现了显著的组间效应。与HCs相比,SF组和NSF组在所有差异脑区的ALFF均增加,但NSF组的R.IFG除外。与SF组相比,NSF组双侧FG的ALFF显著更高,而R.IFG的ALFF更低。
与SF组和HC组相比,NSF组双侧FG的ALFF更高。我们的研究结果表明,FG的脑活动异常可能是解释GTCS患者癫痫控制失败的一个潜在神经基质。