Shaukat Aasma, Rex Douglas K, Shyne Michael, Church Timothy R, Moscatelli Joseph P, Colton Joshua B
Division of Gastroenterology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, United States.
Division of Gastroenterology, University of Minnesota System, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Endosc Int Open. 2022 Apr 14;10(4):E534-E538. doi: 10.1055/a-1784-0313. eCollection 2022 Apr.
Colonoscopy is effective in reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer, but interval cancers remain a concern and their occurrence mainly is thought to be due to poor detection of sessile serrated lesions (SSLs) and advanced neoplasia (AN). Currently there are no low-cost, easy-to-implement tools to improve detection of difficult-to-detect polyps. Our aims were to compare the detection rate for SSLs and AN between two groups of endoscopists at a large community practice, one of which received an intervention of a polyp detection poster displayed over the monitor in their endoscopy suite for 6 months. We compared preintervention and post-intervention detection rates in the intervention and control groups. This was a convenience case control quality improvement project. For 6 months, a 2' × 3' poster of pictures of SSLs and advanced neoplasia was displayed over the monitor for 44 endoscopist in a large community gastroenterology practice in the Minneapolis/St.Paul area, while another 44 physicians performed colonoscopy in the usual fashion without the poster. The endpoints were improvement in detection rates for SSLs and AN preintervention and post-intervention between the control and intervention groups. During the study, 88 endoscopists performed 54,861 colonoscopies. At least one adenoma was detected in 41.3 % of patients, one or more SSLs in 11.4 %, and AN in 10.6 %. During the intervention period, the SSL detection rates were 10.9 % and 12.3 % for the control and intervention groups and for AN, the detection rates were 10.4 % and 10.75 % for the two groups, respectively. Exposure to the polyp detection poster significantly changed SSL detection for the intervention group relative to the control group (likelihood ratio test < 0.001). No significant effect of the intervention was observed for detection of AN, right-sided AN or left-sided AN, or adenoma detection rate. Placement of a polyp detection poster above the endoscopy video monitor increased detection of SSL but not AN.
结肠镜检查在降低结直肠癌发病率方面是有效的,但间隔期癌仍然是一个问题,其发生主要被认为是由于对无蒂锯齿状病变(SSLs)和进展期瘤变(AN)的检测不佳。目前尚无低成本、易于实施的工具来改善对难以检测到的息肉的检测。我们的目的是比较在一个大型社区医疗机构中两组内镜医师对SSLs和AN的检测率,其中一组在内镜检查室的显示器上展示息肉检测海报6个月作为干预措施。我们比较了干预组和对照组干预前和干预后的检测率。 这是一个便利病例对照质量改进项目。在明尼阿波利斯/圣保罗地区的一个大型社区胃肠病学实践中,为期6个月,在44名内镜医师的显示器上展示了一张2英尺×3英尺的SSLs和进展期瘤变图片的海报,而另外44名医生以常规方式进行结肠镜检查,没有海报。终点是对照组和干预组干预前和干预后SSLs和AN检测率的改善情况。 在研究期间,88名内镜医师进行了54,861例结肠镜检查。41.3%的患者检测到至少一个腺瘤,11.4%检测到一个或多个SSLs,10.6%检测到AN。在干预期,对照组和干预组的SSL检测率分别为10.9%和12.3%,对于AN,两组的检测率分别为10.4%和10.75%。与对照组相比,干预组接触息肉检测海报显著改变了SSL检测(似然比检验<0.001)。对于AN、右侧AN或左侧AN的检测或腺瘤检测率,未观察到干预的显著效果。在内镜视频显示器上方放置息肉检测海报增加了SSL的检测,但未增加AN的检测。