• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估医学招生中的可区分社会技能:构建驱动的发展是否解决了情境判断测验的效度问题?

Assessing distinguishable social skills in medical admission: does construct-driven development solve validity issues of situational judgment tests?

机构信息

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, N30, Martinistraße 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03305-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-022-03305-x
PMID:35440029
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9020047/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Social skills are important for future physicians and are therefore increasingly considered in selection processes. One economic assessment method from which different social skills can be inferred are Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs) in which applicants are asked to rate behavioral responses in context-relevant situations. However, traditional SJTs have so far failed to distinctively measure specified constructs. To address this shortcoming in the medical admission context, we applied a construct-driven approach of SJT development in which test development was deductively guided by agency and communion as target constructs.

METHOD

The final version of the construct-driven SJT includes 15 items per construct with three behavioral responses. Medical school applicants (N = 1527) completed the construct-driven SJT, a traditional SJT, and an aptitude test under high-stakes condition as part of their application. A subsample (N = 575) participated in a subsequent voluntary online study with self-report measures of personality and past behavior.

RESULTS

The proposed two-factor structure and internal consistency of the construct-driven SJT was confirmed. Communal SJT scores were positively associated with self-reported communal personality and communal behavior, yet effects were smaller than expected. Findings for agentic SJT scores were mixed with positive small associations to self-reported agentic personality scores and agentic behavior but unexpected negative relations to communal self-reported measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that construct-driven SJTs might overcome validity limitations of traditional SJTs, although their implementation is challenging. Despite first indicators of validity, future research needs to address practical points of application in high-stakes settings, inclusion of other constructs, and especially prediction of actual behavior before the application of construct-driven SJTs for selection purposes in medical admission can be recommended.

摘要

背景

社交技能对未来的医生很重要,因此越来越多地在选拔过程中被考虑。可以推断出不同社交技能的一种经济评估方法是情境判断测验(SJTs),其中要求申请人根据相关情境评估行为反应。然而,传统的 SJTs 迄今为止未能明显测量指定的结构。为了解决医学入学背景下的这一缺点,我们应用了一种情境判断测验的结构驱动方法,其中测验的开发是由机构和交流作为目标结构进行演绎指导的。

方法

结构驱动的 SJTs 的最终版本包括每个结构的 15 个项目,每个项目有三个行为反应。医学院申请者(N=1527)在高风险条件下完成了结构驱动的 SJTs、传统的 SJTs 和一项能力倾向测试,作为申请的一部分。一个子样本(N=575)参与了随后的自愿在线研究,包括人格和过去行为的自我报告测量。

结果

提出的两因素结构和结构驱动 SJTs 的内部一致性得到了确认。社会 SJTs 分数与自我报告的社会人格和社会行为呈正相关,但效果比预期的要小。对代理 SJTs 分数的发现则比较复杂,与自我报告的代理人格分数和代理行为呈正相关,但与自我报告的社会分数呈意外的负相关。

结论

结果表明,结构驱动的 SJTs 可能克服了传统 SJTs 的有效性限制,尽管它们的实施具有挑战性。尽管有了初步的有效性指标,但未来的研究需要解决高风险环境下的实际应用问题,包括其他结构的纳入,特别是在推荐将结构驱动的 SJTs 用于医学入学选拔目的之前,需要预测实际行为。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/5b36427b93c0/12909_2022_3305_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/03245a5ac39c/12909_2022_3305_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/c630ea9e10cb/12909_2022_3305_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/5b36427b93c0/12909_2022_3305_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/03245a5ac39c/12909_2022_3305_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/c630ea9e10cb/12909_2022_3305_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/af50/9020047/5b36427b93c0/12909_2022_3305_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing distinguishable social skills in medical admission: does construct-driven development solve validity issues of situational judgment tests?评估医学招生中的可区分社会技能:构建驱动的发展是否解决了情境判断测验的效度问题?
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Apr 20;22(1):293. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03305-x.
2
Predicting undergraduate OSCE performance using traditional and construct-driven situational judgment tests at admission.在入学时使用传统的和基于结构驱动的情景判断测试来预测本科客观结构化临床考试成绩。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Sep 30. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10379-3.
3
Situational judgement tests for selection: Traditional vs construct-driven approaches.情境判断测试在选拔中的应用:传统方法与建构驱动方法的比较。
Med Educ. 2020 Feb;54(2):105-115. doi: 10.1111/medu.14011. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Improving Our Ability to Predict Resident Applicant Performance: Validity Evidence for a Situational Judgment Test.提高我们预测住院医师申请人表现的能力:情境判断测验的效标证据。
Teach Learn Med. 2020 Oct-Dec;32(5):508-521. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2020.1760104. Epub 2020 May 19.
5
The effects of response instructions on situational judgment test performance and validity in a high-stakes context.在高风险情境下,反应指令对情境判断测验成绩及效度的影响。
J Appl Psychol. 2009 Jul;94(4):1095-101. doi: 10.1037/a0014628.
6
Evaluating the validity of an integrity-based situational judgement test for medical school admissions.评估一项基于诚信的情境判断测试在医学院招生中的有效性。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Sep 2;15:144. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0424-0.
7
The Predictive Validity of a Text-Based Situational Judgment Test in Undergraduate Medical and Dental School Admissions.基于文本的情境判断测试在本科医学和牙科学院招生中的预测效度。
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1250-1253. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001630.
8
Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.医学教育与培训中的情境判断测试:研究、理论与实践:AMEE指南第100号
Med Teach. 2016;38(1):3-17. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1072619. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
9
Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability.情境判断测验作为一种测量人格的方法:可靠性测试的开发和有效性证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0211884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211884. eCollection 2019.
10
Scoring method of a Situational Judgment Test: influence on internal consistency reliability, adverse impact and correlation with personality?情境判断测验的计分方法:对内部一致性信度、不利影响以及与人格的相关性有何影响?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2017 May;22(2):243-265. doi: 10.1007/s10459-016-9720-7. Epub 2016 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining competence profiles in obstetrics and gynecology using the modified requirement tracking questionnaire.使用改良的需求跟踪问卷确定妇产科的能力概况。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):204. doi: 10.1186/s12909-025-06806-7.
2
Physicians' Social Skills - Conceptualization, Taxonomy, and Behavioral Assessment.医生的社交技能——概念化、分类法及行为评估
Perspect Med Educ. 2024 Dec 26;13(1):635-645. doi: 10.5334/pme.1171. eCollection 2024.
3
Predicting undergraduate OSCE performance using traditional and construct-driven situational judgment tests at admission.

本文引用的文献

1
Hidden framings and hidden asymmetries in the measurement of personality--A combined lens-model and frame-of-reference perspective.人格测量中的隐性框架和隐性不对称——一种综合镜头模型和参照框架的观点。
J Pers. 2021 Apr;89(2):357-375. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12586. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
2
Situational judgement test validity for selection: A systematic review and meta-analysis.情境判断测验在选拔中的有效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Med Educ. 2020 Oct;54(10):888-902. doi: 10.1111/medu.14201. Epub 2020 Aug 25.
3
Situational judgement tests for selection: Traditional vs construct-driven approaches.
在入学时使用传统的和基于结构驱动的情景判断测试来预测本科客观结构化临床考试成绩。
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2024 Sep 30. doi: 10.1007/s10459-024-10379-3.
4
Measuring personal characteristics in applicants to German medical schools: Piloting an online Situational Judgement Test with an open-ended response format.测量德国医学院申请者的个人特征:使用开放式回答格式对在线情境判断测试进行试点。
GMS J Med Educ. 2024 Jun 17;41(3):Doc30. doi: 10.3205/zma001685. eCollection 2024.
5
The effects of language proficiency and awareness of time limit in animated vs. text-based situational judgment tests.语言熟练程度和对限时的意识对动画与文本情景判断测试的影响。
BMC Med Educ. 2024 May 15;24(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05513-z.
6
Predicting Actual Social Skill Expression from Personality and Skill Self-Concepts.从人格和技能自我概念预测实际社交技能表现。
J Intell. 2022 Jul 29;10(3):48. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence10030048.
情境判断测试在选拔中的应用:传统方法与建构驱动方法的比较。
Med Educ. 2020 Feb;54(2):105-115. doi: 10.1111/medu.14011. Epub 2019 Dec 23.
4
Situational Judgment Tests as a method for measuring personality: Development and validity evidence for a test of Dependability.情境判断测验作为一种测量人格的方法:可靠性测试的开发和有效性证据。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 27;14(2):e0211884. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0211884. eCollection 2019.
5
[Selection of medical students : Measurement of cognitive abilities and psychosocial competencies].[医学生的选拔:认知能力和社会心理能力的测量]
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2018 Feb;61(2):178-186. doi: 10.1007/s00103-017-2670-2.
6
Medical doctors' job specification analysis: A qualitative inquiry.医生工作规范分析:一项定性研究。
GMS J Med Educ. 2017 Oct 16;34(4):Doc43. doi: 10.3205/zma001120. eCollection 2017.
7
What is a good doctor?什么是好医生?
Wien Med Wochenschr. 2018 Nov;168(15-16):398-405. doi: 10.1007/s10354-017-0597-8. Epub 2017 Sep 13.
8
How effective are selection methods in medical education? A systematic review.医学教育中的选择方法有多有效?系统评价。
Med Educ. 2016 Jan;50(1):36-60. doi: 10.1111/medu.12817.
9
Finally finished! National Competence Based Catalogues of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) and Dental Education (NKLZ) ready for trial.终于完成了!本科医学教育基于国家能力的学习目标目录(NKLM)和牙科教育基于国家能力的学习目标目录(NKLZ)准备好进行试用。
GMS Z Med Ausbild. 2015;32(3):Doc35. doi: 10.3205/zma000977.
10
Situational judgement tests in medical education and training: Research, theory and practice: AMEE Guide No. 100.医学教育与培训中的情境判断测试:研究、理论与实践:AMEE指南第100号
Med Teach. 2016;38(1):3-17. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2015.1072619. Epub 2015 Aug 27.