Patel Preethi, Deshpande Abhishek, Yu Pei-Chun, Imrey Peter B, Lindenauer Peter K, Zilberberg Marya D, Haessler Sarah, Rothberg Michael B
Department of Hospital Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2023 Jan;44(1):47-54. doi: 10.1017/ice.2022.60. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
infection (CDI) is the most common cause of gastroenteritis, and community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is the most common infection treated in hospitals. American Thoracic Society (ATS)/Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) CAP guidelines recommend empiric therapy with a respiratory fluoroquinolone or cephalosporin plus macrolide combination, but the CDI risk of these regimens is unknown. We examined the association between each antibiotic regimen and the development of hospital-onset CDI.
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from 638 US hospitals contributing administrative including 177 also contributing microbiologic data to Premier, Inc. We included adults admitted with pneumonia and discharged from July 2010 through June 2015 with a pneumonia diagnosis code who received ≥3 days of either empiric regimen. Hospital-onset CDI was defined by a diagnosis code not present on admission and positive laboratory test on day 4 or later or readmission for CDI. Mixed propensity-weighted multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the associations of CDI with antibiotic regimens.
Our sample included 58,060 patients treated with either cephalosporin plus macrolide (36,796 patients) or a fluoroquinolone alone (21,264 patients) and with microbiological data; 127 (0.35%) patients who received cephalosporin plus macrolide and 65 (0.31%) who received a fluoroquinolone developed CDI. After adjustment for patient demographics, comorbidities, risk factors for antimicrobial resistance, and hospital characteristics, CDI risks were similar for fluoroquinolones versus cephalosporin plus macrolide (odds ratio [OR], 0.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-1.38).
Among patients with CAP at US hospitals, CDI was uncommon, occurring in ∼0.33% of patients. We did not detect a significant association between the choice of empiric guideline recommended antibiotic therapy and the development of CDI.
艰难梭菌感染(CDI)是胃肠炎最常见的病因,而社区获得性肺炎(CAP)是医院中最常见的感染性疾病。美国胸科学会(ATS)/美国感染病学会(IDSA)的CAP指南推荐使用呼吸喹诺酮类或头孢菌素加大环内酯类药物进行经验性治疗,但这些方案的CDI风险尚不清楚。我们研究了每种抗生素方案与医院获得性CDI发生之间的关联。
我们进行了一项回顾性队列研究,使用来自638家美国医院的行政数据,其中177家医院还向Premier公司提供微生物学数据。我们纳入了2010年7月至2015年6月期间因肺炎入院并出院且有肺炎诊断代码且接受了≥3天经验性治疗方案之一的成年人。医院获得性CDI的定义为入院时不存在诊断代码且在第4天或之后实验室检查呈阳性或因CDI再次入院。采用混合倾向加权多元逻辑回归来估计CDI与抗生素方案之间的关联。
我们的样本包括58060例接受头孢菌素加大环内酯类药物治疗(36796例患者)或仅接受氟喹诺酮类药物治疗(21264例患者)且有微生物学数据的患者;接受头孢菌素加大环内酯类药物治疗的患者中有127例(0.35%)发生CDI,接受氟喹诺酮类药物治疗的患者中有65例(0.31%)发生CDI。在对患者人口统计学、合并症、抗菌药物耐药风险因素和医院特征进行调整后,氟喹诺酮类药物与头孢菌素加大环内酯类药物的CDI风险相似(比值比[OR],0.98;95%置信区间[CI],0.70 - 1.38)。
在美国医院的CAP患者中,CDI并不常见,约0.33%的患者发生。我们未发现经验性指南推荐的抗生素治疗选择与CDI发生之间存在显著关联。