• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

图书馆员在健康素养方面的学术努力状况:文献计量分析。

The status of scholarly efforts of librarians on health literacy: a bibliometric analysis.

出版信息

J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):166-173. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1253.

DOI:10.5195/jmla.2022.1253
PMID:35440903
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9014954/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

In order to determine the status of scholarly efforts on health literacy by librarians, researchers examined the characteristics of health literacy publications authored by librarians from 2000 to 2020.

METHODS

Bibliometric analysis was used to assess the indicators of productivity, affiliation, collaboration, and citation metrics of librarians in health literacy-related research. Data were collected using the Scopus database; articles were screened for inclusion before importation into Microsoft Excel for analysis. SPSS software was used to run basic descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Of 797 search results, 460 references met the inclusion criteria of librarian authorship. There was a significant linear trend upward in publications since 2001 with an average increase of 1.52 papers per year. The number of publications per year peaked in 2019 (n=59). was the most prolific journal. The majority of references were authored by at least two authors and by multidisciplinary teams. Nineteen percent (n=107) of the librarian authors were responsible for more than one publication, and 84.1% of publications were cited at least once.

CONCLUSIONS

In the last two decades, librarian involvement in health literacy publications has exponentially increased, most markedly in the years following 2014. The productivity, multidisciplinary collaboration efforts, and consistent growth in literature indicate that librarians are engaged in health literacy scholarship. Further research is needed to explore the work of librarians whose impacts on health literacy may not be reflected within well-indexed, peer-reviewed publications.

摘要

目的

为了确定图书馆员在健康素养方面的学术研究成果的状况,研究人员调查了 2000 年至 2020 年期间图书馆员撰写的健康素养出版物的特征。

方法

采用文献计量学分析评估了与健康素养相关研究中图书馆员的生产力、隶属关系、合作和引文指标。使用 Scopus 数据库收集数据;在导入 Microsoft Excel 进行分析之前,对文章进行筛选以确定是否纳入。使用 SPSS 软件运行基本描述性统计。

结果

在 797 条搜索结果中,有 460 条参考文献符合图书馆员作者的纳入标准。自 2001 年以来,出版物呈显著线性上升趋势,平均每年增加 1.52 篇。每年的出版物数量在 2019 年达到峰值(n=59)。是最具影响力的期刊。大多数参考文献至少有两位作者和多学科团队撰写。19%(n=107)的图书馆员作者负责不止一篇出版物,84.1%的出版物至少被引用过一次。

结论

在过去的二十年中,图书馆员参与健康素养出版物的数量呈指数级增长,尤其是在 2014 年之后。生产力、多学科合作努力和文献的持续增长表明,图书馆员正在从事健康素养研究。需要进一步研究来探索那些对健康素养可能没有反映在索引良好的同行评议出版物中的工作的图书馆员的工作。

相似文献

1
The status of scholarly efforts of librarians on health literacy: a bibliometric analysis.图书馆员在健康素养方面的学术努力状况:文献计量分析。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Apr 1;110(2):166-173. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1253.
2
Scientific publications in cancer: in Latin America, strong scientific networks increase productivity (the TENJIN study).癌症领域的科学出版物:在拉丁美洲,强大的科学网络可提高生产力(TENJIN 研究)。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Oct;126:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.05.033. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
3
Trends in authorship characteristics and collaboration in pharmacy practice publications: 2011-2020.2011 - 2020年药学实践出版物的作者特征与合作趋势
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2023 Mar;19(3):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2022.11.002. Epub 2022 Nov 8.
4
Scholarly Productivity Evaluation of KL2 Scholars Using Bibliometrics and Federal Follow-on Funding: Cross-Institution Study.使用文献计量学和联邦后续资助评估 KL2 学者的学术产出:跨机构研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Sep 29;23(9):e29239. doi: 10.2196/29239.
5
Bibliometric Analysis of Erectile Dysfunction Publications in Urology and Sexual Medicine Journals.泌尿学和性医学期刊中勃起功能障碍文献的计量分析。
J Sex Med. 2018 Oct;15(10):1426-1433. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2018.08.004. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
6
A comparative bibliometric analysis of the top 150 cited papers in hypospadiology (1945-2013).尿道下裂(1945 - 2013年)领域被引用次数排名前150的论文的比较文献计量分析
J Pediatr Urol. 2015 Apr;11(2):85.e1-85.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2014.11.022. Epub 2015 Mar 4.
7
Worldwide melatonin research: a bibliometric analysis of the published literature between 2015 and 2019.全球褪黑素研究:2015 年至 2019 年发表文献的计量学分析。
Chronobiol Int. 2021 Jan;38(1):27-37. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2020.1838534. Epub 2020 Nov 8.
8
A bibliometric study of research pertaining to the oldest-old (age eighty-five and older).一项关于最老年人群(85 岁及以上)的研究的文献计量学研究。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2020 Jan;108(1):59-66. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2020.762. Epub 2020 Jan 1.
9
Diabetes-related foot disease research in Aotearoa New Zealand: a bibliometric analysis (1970-2020).新西兰奥塔哥大学糖尿病足病研究:文献计量分析(1970-2020 年)。
J Foot Ankle Res. 2022 Mar 21;15(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13047-022-00528-5.
10
Health sciences and medical librarians conducting research and their experiences asking for co-authorship.健康科学和医学图书馆员开展研究及其寻求合著的经验。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2022 Oct 1;110(4):449-462. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2022.1485.

引用本文的文献

1
Impacts of educational interventions of librarian instruction on health information seeking attitudes and behaviors in an employee wellness program.图书馆员教学对员工健康计划中健康信息寻求态度和行为的教育干预的影响。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2024 Apr 1;112(2):107-116. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2024.1775. Epub 2024 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
An historical overview of the National Network of Libraries of Medicine, 1985-2015.1985 - 2015年美国国立医学图书馆网络历史概述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Apr;106(2):162-174. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.297. Epub 2018 Apr 1.
2
Librarians Promoting Changes in the Health Care Delivery System through Systematic Assessment.图书馆员通过系统评估推动医疗服务体系变革。
Med Ref Serv Q. 2018 Apr-Jun;37(2):142-152. doi: 10.1080/02763869.2018.1439216.
3
Roles for librarians in systematic reviews: a scoping review.图书馆员在系统评价中的作用:一项范围综述
J Med Libr Assoc. 2018 Jan;106(1):46-56. doi: 10.5195/jmla.2018.82. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
4
Libraries and Librarians: Key Partners for Progress in Health Literacy Research and Practice.图书馆与图书馆员:健康素养研究与实践进展的关键伙伴
Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;240:415-432.
5
Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.Rayyan——一款用于系统评价的网络和移动应用程序。
Syst Rev. 2016 Dec 5;5(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0384-4.
6
Bibliometric indicators: opportunities and limits.文献计量指标:机遇与局限
J Med Libr Assoc. 2015 Oct;103(4):219-21. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.103.4.014.
7
Health literacy and the Affordable Care Act: a policy analysis for children with special health care needs in the USA.健康素养与《平价医疗法案》:美国有特殊医疗需求儿童的政策分析
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2015 Apr 7;8:31-6. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S80699. eCollection 2015.
8
Using publication metrics to highlight academic productivity and research impact.利用出版指标突出学术产出和研究影响力。
Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Oct;21(10):1160-72. doi: 10.1111/acem.12482.
9
Citation classics in systematic reviews and meta-analyses: who wrote the top 100 most cited articles?系统评价和荟萃分析中的引文经典:谁写了前 100 篇被引频次最高的文章?
PLoS One. 2013 Oct 14;8(10):e78517. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0078517. eCollection 2013.
10
Bibliometric indicators: quality measurements of scientific publication.文献计量指标:科学出版物的质量衡量标准。
Radiology. 2010 May;255(2):342-51. doi: 10.1148/radiol.09090626.