Suppr超能文献

影响临床医生电子病历使用体验的因素。

Factors That Influence Clinician Experience with Electronic Health Records.

出版信息

Perspect Health Inf Manag. 2022 Jan 1;19(1):1f. eCollection 2022 Winter.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report quantitative and qualitative analyses of features, functionalities, organizational, training, clinical specialties, and other factors that impact electronic health record (EHR) experience based on a survey by two large healthcare systems.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 816 clinicians-352 (43 percent) physicians, 96 (12 percent) residents/fellows, 177 (22 percent) nurses, 96 (12 percent) advanced practice providers, and 95 (12 percent) allied health professionals-completed surveys on different EHRs. Responses were analyzed for quantitative and qualitative factors. The measured outcome was calculated as a net EHR experience.

RESULTS

Net EHR experience represents overall satisfaction that clinicians report with the EHR and its usability. EHR experience for Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center and University of Chicago Medicine was low. There were noticeable differences in physician and nursing experiences with EHRs at both universities. EHR personalization, years of practice, impact on efficiency, quality of care, and satisfaction with EHR training contributed significantly to the net EHR experience. Satisfaction of certain specialty practitioners such as endocrinology, family medicine, infectious disease, nephrology, neurology, and pulmonology was noted to be especially low. Ability to use a split-screen function to view labs, follow-up training from other providers rather than vendors, reduced documentation time burden, fewer click boxes, more customizable order sets, improved messaging, e-prescribing, and improved integration were the most common desired EHR improvements requested on qualitative analysis.

DISCUSSION

EHR experience was low regardless of the system and may be improved by better EHR training, increased utilization of personalization tools, reduced documentation burden, and enhanced EHR design and functionality. There was a difference between provider and nursing experiences with the EHR.

CONCLUSION

Designing better EHR training, increasing utilization of personalization tools, enhancing functionality, and decreasing documentation burden may lead to a better EHR experience.

摘要

目的

报告根据两个大型医疗系统的调查,对电子健康记录 (EHR) 体验的特征、功能、组织、培训、临床专业以及其他影响因素进行定量和定性分析。

材料和方法

共有 816 名临床医生 - 352 名(43%)医生、96 名(12%)住院医师/研究员、177 名(22%)护士、96 名(12%)高级实践提供者和 95 名(12%)联合卫生专业人员 - 完成了不同 EHR 的调查。对回答进行了定量和定性因素分析。衡量的结果是计算出的电子健康记录体验的净得分。

结果

电子健康记录体验代表了临床医生对电子健康记录及其可用性的总体满意度。弗吉尼亚联邦大学医疗中心和芝加哥大学医学中心的电子健康记录体验较低。这两所大学的医生和护士在电子健康记录方面的体验存在明显差异。电子健康记录的个性化、实践年限、对效率的影响、护理质量以及对电子健康记录培训的满意度对电子健康记录的净体验有显著贡献。内分泌学、家庭医学、传染病学、肾脏病学、神经病学和肺病学等某些专业医生的满意度尤其低。在定性分析中,最常见的电子健康记录改进请求包括能够使用分屏功能查看实验室结果、接受其他提供者而不是供应商的后续培训、减少文档记录时间负担、减少点击框数、更可定制的医嘱集、改进消息传递、电子处方和改进集成。

讨论

无论使用何种系统,电子健康记录体验都较低,通过更好的电子健康记录培训、增加个性化工具的使用、减少文档记录负担以及增强电子健康记录的设计和功能,电子健康记录体验可能会得到改善。提供者和护理人员对电子健康记录的体验存在差异。

结论

设计更好的电子健康记录培训、增加个性化工具的使用、增强功能以及减少文档记录负担可能会带来更好的电子健康记录体验。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

6
Professional Satisfaction and the Career Plans of US Physicians.美国医生的职业满意度与职业规划
Mayo Clin Proc. 2017 Nov;92(11):1625-1635. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.08.017. Epub 2017 Nov 1.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验