Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Chronic Diseases Metabolism and Ageing, Catholic University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Jul;56(2):271-281. doi: 10.1111/apt.16928. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Biologicals represent the cornerstone of treatment for moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Many patients cycle between biologicals when encountering loss of response or adverse events.
To assess the occurrence of serious infections and malignancies with exposure to several (classes of) biologicals.
We performed a retrospective cohort study in a tertiary referral centre including consecutive IBD patients exposed to adalimumab, infliximab, ustekinumab or vedolizumab between 1996 and 2019. All serious infections and malignancies, as well as potential confounders, were accounted for.
In total, 1575 patients were included with a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 10 (6-16) years and a duration of biological therapy of 71 (39-112) months. Incidence rates of serious infections were 3.4 per 100 patients' years (PY) in the post-biological setting. Serious infections after biological exposure were associated with systemic steroids in monotherapy (hazard ratio 2.96 [95% confidence interval 1.78-4.93], p < 0.0001), combination therapy of systemic steroids and a biological (2.44 [1.37-4.34], p = 0.002), female gender (1.25 [1.04-1.51], p = 0.02), and prior serious infections in the pre-biological setting (1.42 [1.03-1.96], p = 0.03). Malignancy rates were 1.06 per 100PY in the post-biological setting and increased with older age at biological initiation (1.04 [1.02-1.05], p < 0.0001). The risk for serious infections or malignancies was independent of type and number of biologicals to which the patient was exposed.
This study shows that the sequential use of biological therapy in IBD does not seem to convey an overall higher risk of serious infections or malignancies, but that underlying more refractory disease seems to increase this risk.
生物制剂是治疗中重度炎症性肠病(IBD)的基石。许多患者在遇到治疗反应不佳或出现不良反应时会循环使用生物制剂。
评估使用多种(类)生物制剂治疗时发生严重感染和恶性肿瘤的情况。
我们在一家三级转诊中心进行了一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了 1996 年至 2019 年间接受阿达木单抗、英夫利昔单抗、乌司奴单抗或维得利珠单抗治疗的连续 IBD 患者。所有严重感染和恶性肿瘤以及潜在的混杂因素均被考虑在内。
共纳入 1575 例患者,中位(四分位距)随访时间为 10(6-16)年,生物治疗持续时间为 71(39-112)个月。生物治疗后严重感染的发生率为每 100 患者年 3.4 例(3.4 per 100 patients' years, PY)。生物治疗后发生严重感染与单药使用全身皮质类固醇(风险比 2.96 [95%置信区间 1.78-4.93],p<0.0001)、全身皮质类固醇与生物制剂联合治疗(2.44 [1.37-4.34],p=0.002)、女性(1.25 [1.04-1.51],p=0.02)和生物治疗前有过严重感染(1.42 [1.03-1.96],p=0.03)相关。生物治疗后恶性肿瘤的发生率为每 100PY 1.06 例,且随着生物治疗起始年龄的增加而增加(1.04 [1.02-1.05],p<0.0001)。严重感染或恶性肿瘤的风险与患者接受的生物制剂的类型和数量无关。
本研究表明,IBD 患者序贯使用生物制剂似乎不会增加严重感染或恶性肿瘤的总体风险,但潜在的更难治性疾病似乎会增加这种风险。