Suppr超能文献

多中心欧洲随机 3 期临床试验 CWS/RMS-96 治疗儿童、青少年和青年局限性高危软组织肉瘤的长期结果。

Long-term results from the multicentric European randomized phase 3 trial CWS/RMS-96 for localized high-risk soft tissue sarcoma in children, adolescents, and young adults.

机构信息

Klinikum der Landeshauptstadt Stuttgart gKAöR, Olgahospital, Stuttgart Cancer Center, Zentrum für Kinder-, Jugend- und Frauenmedizin, Pädiatrie 5 (Pädiatrische Onkologie, Hämatologie, Immunologie), Stuttgart, Germany.

Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2022 Sep;69(9):e29691. doi: 10.1002/pbc.29691. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

CWS/RMS-96 was an international multicenter trial with randomization between two therapy arms of the standard four-drug therapy (vincristine, ifosfamide, adriamycin, dactinomycin [VAIA]) versus an intensified six-drug regimen (carboplatin, epirubicin, vincristine, dactinomycin, ifosfamide, and etoposide [CEVAIE]) for high-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES), and undifferentiated sarcoma (UDS) in children, adolescents, and young adults aiming to improve their survival. Intensified chemotherapy with CEVAIE did not improve outcome.

METHODS

Patients younger than 21 years with a previously untreated localized HR-RMS, EES, and UDS were enrolled from Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS) centers in Germany, Austria, Poland, Switzerland, and from Italian Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee (STSC) centers. Randomization (1:1) to receive either 9 × 21 days cycles of VAIA or CEVAIE was performed separately in CWS and STSC. Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy (32-44.8 Gy) was added at week 9-12 according to histology and response to chemotherapy. A secondary microscopically complete nonmutilating resection was performed if possible. Primary endpoints were response to chemotherapy, event-free (EFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Five hundred fifty-seven patients (HR-RMS: n = 416, EES and UDS: n = 141) underwent randomization: VAIA (n = 273) or CEVAIE (n = 284). Radiotherapy was given to 70% of patients in both groups. A secondary resection was performed in 47% and 48% patients, respectively. The 5-year EFS and OS for the VAIA and CEVAIE treatment arms were 59.8% and 60.8% (p = .89), and 74.2% and 68.3% (p = .16), respectively. No differences in response, toxicity, or second malignancies emerged in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The use of an intensified regimen failed to show a significant improvement in tumor response and outcome of patients with localized HR-RMS, EES, and UDS.

摘要

背景

CWS/RMS-96 是一项国际多中心试验,在标准的四药治疗(长春新碱、异环磷酰胺、阿霉素、放线菌素 D [VAIA])与强化的六药方案(卡铂、表柔比星、长春新碱、放线菌素 D、异环磷酰胺和依托泊苷 [CEVAIE])之间进行随机分组,用于治疗高危横纹肌肉瘤(RMS)、骨外尤文肉瘤(EES)和未分化肉瘤(UDS),旨在提高患者生存率。强化化疗联合 CEVAIE 并未改善预后。

方法

年龄小于 21 岁、患有未经治疗的局限性 HR-RMS、EES 和 UDS 的患者,分别从德国、奥地利、波兰、瑞士的 CWS 中心和意大利软组织肉瘤委员会(STSC)中心入组。CWS 和 STSC 中心分别对患者进行随机分组(1:1),分别接受 9 个 21 天周期的 VAIA 或 CEVAIE 治疗。根据组织学和化疗反应,在第 9-12 周时加用超分割加速放疗(32-44.8Gy)。如果可能,进行二次显微镜下完全非致残性切除术。主要终点为化疗反应、无事件生存(EFS)和总生存(OS)。

结果

557 例患者(HR-RMS:n=416,EES 和 UDS:n=141)进行了随机分组:VAIA(n=273)或 CEVAIE(n=284)。两组患者中均有 70%接受了放疗。分别有 47%和 48%的患者进行了二次切除术。VAIA 和 CEVAIE 治疗组的 5 年 EFS 和 OS 分别为 59.8%和 60.8%(p=0.89)和 74.2%和 68.3%(p=0.16)。两组之间在反应、毒性或第二恶性肿瘤方面无差异。

结论

对于局限性 HR-RMS、EES 和 UDS 患者,强化方案的应用并未显著改善肿瘤反应和结局。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验