Suppr超能文献

紧急医疗服务响应者手动通气性能。

Emergency Medical Services Responder Manual Ventilation Performance.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee.

出版信息

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2023;27(4):496-500. doi: 10.1080/10903127.2022.2066234. Epub 2022 Jun 9.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Manual ventilation is a basic skill that every emergency medical services (EMS) responder is expected to perform proficiently. Improper manual ventilation may result in significant morbidity; however, there is no feedback mechanism or method of control for the volume, pressure, or frequency during manual ventilation. In this study, we aimed to quantify the volume and peak pressures of manually delivered breaths using a simulated lung.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-nine volunteer EMS responders from the EMS World Expo 2019 and EMS Today 2020 participated in this study. Each volunteer manually ventilated a simulated lung using a bag-valve-mask (BVM) for 18 breaths. Descriptive statistics were computed for peak pressures (P) and tidal volumes (V), and a multivariable linear regression was conducted to determine whether there was an independent correlation between P or V and seven different variables.

RESULTS

Both P and V delivered by EMS responders had a high level of variability; 82.9% of clinicians delivered at least one breath exceeding the recommended safety thresholds; and 98.0% delivered at least one breath that was inadequate or excessive. Our results showed no likely clinical significant role of sex, hand size, frequency of use, or years of experience in determining P and V. Tidal volumes were significantly higher in males ( < 0.001), those using two-hand manual ventilation ( < 0.001), shorter hand length ( = 0.013), higher confidence ( < 0.001), and more years of experience ( < 0.001). Peak pressures were significantly higher in those using two-hand manual ventilation ( < 0.001), wider hand width ( = 0.004), higher confidence ( < 0.001), less frequent use of the BVM per month ( < 0.001), more experience ( < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated large variability of V and P within and, to a lesser degree, between clinicians. Of the seven variables that might have affected tidal volume or peak pressures, only the use of two hands versus one hand had a potentially clinically significant effect. Our study identifies a clear need for BVM improvement to ensure every practitioner can deliver breaths at appropriate volumes and safe pressures.

摘要

目的

手动通气是每位急救医疗服务(EMS)人员都应熟练掌握的基本技能。不当的手动通气可能导致严重的发病率;然而,在手动通气期间,没有用于控制容积、压力或频率的反馈机制或方法。在这项研究中,我们旨在使用模拟肺来量化手动通气时的容积和峰值压力。

方法

共有 199 名来自 2019 年 EMS 世界博览会和 2020 年 EMS 今日的志愿 EMS responder 参加了这项研究。每位志愿者使用袋阀面罩(BVM)为模拟肺手动通气 18 次。计算了峰值压力(P)和潮气量(V)的描述性统计数据,并进行了多变量线性回归,以确定 P 或 V 是否与七个不同变量之间存在独立相关性。

结果

EMS responder 所提供的 P 和 V 均具有较高的变异性;82.9%的临床医生至少有一次通气超过了推荐的安全阈值;98.0%的临床医生至少有一次通气不足或过度。我们的结果表明,性别、手的大小、使用频率或经验年限等因素不太可能对 P 和 V 产生显著影响。男性的潮气量显著较高( < 0.001),双手通气者的潮气量显著较高( < 0.001),手的长度较短者的潮气量显著较高( = 0.013),信心较高者的潮气量显著较高( < 0.001),经验年限较长者的潮气量显著较高( < 0.001)。双手通气者的峰值压力显著较高( < 0.001),手较宽者的峰值压力显著较高( = 0.004),信心较高者的峰值压力显著较高( < 0.001),每月使用 BVM 的频率较低者的峰值压力显著较高( < 0.001),经验年限较长者的峰值压力显著较高( < 0.001)。

结论

我们的研究表明,在临床医生内部和一定程度上在临床医生之间,V 和 P 的变异性较大。在可能影响潮气量或峰值压力的七个变量中,只有双手与单手的使用具有潜在的临床显著影响。我们的研究清楚地表明,需要改进 BVM,以确保每位从业人员都能以适当的容积和安全的压力输送呼吸。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验