Safe Place: Center for Child Protection and Health, Division of General Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Center for Pediatric Clinical Effectiveness, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Apr 1;5(4):e225005. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.5005.
Infants who appear neurologically well and have fractures concerning for abuse are at increased risk for clinically occult head injuries. Evidence of excess variation in neuroimaging practices when abuse is suspected may indicate opportunity for quality and safety improvement.
To quantify neuroimaging practice variation across children's hospitals among infants with fractures evaluated for abuse, with the hypothesis that hospitals would vary substantially in neuroimaging practices. As a secondary objective, factors associated with neuroimaging use were identified, with the hypothesis that age and factors associated with potential biases (ie, payer type and race or ethnicity) would be associated with neuroimaging use.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cross-sectional study included infants with a femur or humerus fracture or both undergoing abuse evaluation at 44 select US children's hospitals in the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) from January 1, 2016, through March 30, 2020, including emergency department, observational, and inpatient encounters. Included infants were aged younger than 12 months with a femur or humerus fracture or both without overt signs or symptoms of head injury for whom a skeletal survey was performed. To focus on infants at increased risk for clinically occult head injuries, infants with billing codes suggestive of overt neurologic signs or symptoms were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to investigate demographic, clinical, and temporal factors associated with use of neuroimaging. Marginal standardization was used to report adjusted percentages of infants undergoing neuroimaging by hospital and payer type. Data were analyzed from March 2021 through January 2022.
Covariates included age, sex, race and ethnicity, payer type, fracture type, presentation year, and hospital.
Use of neuroimaging by CT or MRI.
Of 2585 infants with humerus or femur fracture or both undergoing evaluations for possible child abuse, there were 1408 (54.5%) male infants, 1726 infants (66.8%) who were publicly insured, and 1549 infants (59.9%) who underwent neuroimaging. The median (IQR) age was 6.1 (3.2-8.3) months. There were 748 (28.9%) Black non-Hispanic infants, 426 (16.5%) Hispanic infants, 1148 (44.4%) White non-Hispanic infants. In multivariable analyses, younger age (eg, odds ratio [OR] for ages <3 months vs ages 9 to <12 months, 13.2; 95% CI, 9.54-18.2; P < .001), male sex (OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.22-1.78; P < .001), payer type (OR for public vs private insurance, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.18-1.85; P = .003), fracture type (OR for femur and humerus fracture vs isolated femur fracture, 5.36; 95% CI, 2.11-13.6; P = .002), and hospital (adjusted range in use of neuroimaging, 37.4% [95% CI 21.4%-53.5%] to 83.6% [95% CI 69.6%-97.5%]; P < .001) were associated with increased use of neuroimaging, but race and ethnicity were not. Publicly insured infants were more likely to undergo neuroimaging (62.0%; 95% CI, 60.0%-64.1%) than privately insured infants (55.1%; 95% CI, 51.8%-58.4%) (P = .001).
This study found that hospitals varied in neuroimaging practices among infants with concern for abuse. Apparent disparities in practice associated with insurance type suggest opportunities for quality, safety, and equity improvement.
对于那些神经系统表现良好且疑似虐待导致的骨折的婴儿,存在临床上隐匿性头部损伤的风险增加。当怀疑存在虐待时,神经影像学实践中存在过多差异的证据可能表明有机会进行质量和安全改进。
量化在评估疑似虐待的骨折婴儿中,儿童医院之间神经影像学实践的变化,假设医院在神经影像学实践方面会有很大的差异。作为次要目标,确定与神经影像学使用相关的因素,假设年龄以及与潜在偏见相关的因素(即,支付类型和种族或民族)与神经影像学使用相关。
设计、地点和参与者:这项横断面研究包括在 2016 年 1 月 1 日至 2020 年 3 月 30 日期间,在儿科健康信息系统(PHIS)中的 44 家美国儿童医院中,因怀疑虐待而接受评估的患有股骨或肱骨骨折或两者都有的婴儿,包括急诊科、观察和住院患者。纳入的婴儿年龄小于 12 个月,股骨或肱骨骨折或两者均无明显头部损伤迹象或症状,且进行了骨骼检查。为了重点关注临床上隐匿性头部损伤风险增加的婴儿,排除了有明显神经系统体征或症状的 billing 代码提示的婴儿。使用多变量逻辑回归来研究与使用神经影像学相关的人口统计学、临床和时间因素。边际标准化用于报告按医院和支付类型进行神经影像学检查的婴儿的调整百分比。数据分析于 2021 年 3 月至 2022 年 1 月进行。
协变量包括年龄、性别、种族和民族、支付类型、骨折类型、就诊年份和医院。
使用 CT 或 MRI 进行神经影像学检查。
在 2585 名接受疑似儿童虐待评估的患有肱骨或股骨骨折或两者都有的婴儿中,有 1408 名(54.5%)为男性婴儿,1726 名(66.8%)为公共保险婴儿,1549 名(59.9%)进行了神经影像学检查。中位数(IQR)年龄为 6.1(3.2-8.3)个月。有 748 名(28.9%)黑人非西班牙裔婴儿,426 名(16.5%)西班牙裔婴儿,1148 名(44.4%)白人非西班牙裔婴儿。在多变量分析中,年龄较小(例如,年龄 <3 个月与年龄 9 至 <12 个月的比值比,13.2;95%CI,9.54-18.2;P<0.001)、男性(比值比,1.47;95%CI,1.22-1.78;P<0.001)、支付类型(公共保险与私人保险的比值比,1.48;95%CI,1.18-1.85;P=0.003)、骨折类型(股骨和肱骨骨折与单纯股骨骨折的比值比,5.36;95%CI,2.11-13.6;P=0.002)和医院(神经影像学使用的调整范围,37.4%[95%CI 21.4%-53.5%]至 83.6%[95%CI 69.6%-97.5%];P<0.001)与神经影像学使用的增加相关,但种族和民族无关。公共保险婴儿(62.0%;95%CI,60.0%-64.1%)比私人保险婴儿(55.1%;95%CI,51.8%-58.4%)更有可能接受神经影像学检查(P=0.001)。
本研究发现,在怀疑虐待的婴儿中,医院在神经影像学实践方面存在差异。与保险类型相关的明显实践差异表明有机会提高质量、安全性和公平性。