Suppr超能文献

理解儿科初级保健中社会决定因素健康干预措施的照顾者视角。

Understanding Caregiver Perspective on Social Determinants of Health Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, St. Christopher's Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Popul Health Manag. 2022 Apr;25(2):172-177. doi: 10.1089/pop.2021.0317.

Abstract

Comprehensive social risk screening has become standard practice in primary care. Evidence is lacking, however, on whether and how interventions provided for positive screens are being utilized. This study aimed to create a standardized follow-up process to evaluate caregiver perspective and usage of community resources provided during well-child visits. Follow-up calls were made to families with positive screens for food insecurity (FI) and/or utility insecurity (UI) ( = 347). Phone interviews assessed resource usage, effectiveness, influence on stress level, and current insecurity status. Caregiver responses regarding barriers to resource usage were inductively analyzed and developed into major themes. The sample included 228 (65.7%) families with positive screens for FI and 166 (47.8%) families screening positive for UI. Of those who completed interviews ( = 108), 77 (71.3%) caregivers recalled being provided resources during their child's visit with only 33 (42.9%) reporting use of those resources. Twelve (36.4%) of those caregivers who used the resources confirmed that their insecurity was still a concern. Five major themes for barriers to resource usage emerged: (1) improved situation, (2) perception, (3) access barriers, (4) conflicting priorities, and (5) too busy/overwhelmed. The majority of caregivers (95.7% of asked) noted that their insecurity caused increased stress with 70.5% acknowledging decreased stress levels after discussion with a provider. Integrating caregiver input through a standardized follow-up protocol into provided interventions for screened social risks can improve not only the quality and effectiveness of provided resources, but also provide insight into the impact of those interventions on insecurity from the caregiver perspective.

摘要

综合社会风险筛查已成为初级保健的标准实践。然而,缺乏证据表明针对阳性筛查提供的干预措施是否以及如何得到利用。本研究旨在创建一个标准化的随访流程,以评估在儿童健康访视期间提供的照顾者对社区资源的看法和使用情况。对有食物不安全(FI)和/或公用事业不安全(UI)阳性筛查的家庭( = 347)进行随访电话。电话访谈评估了资源的使用情况、效果、对压力水平的影响以及当前的不安全状况。对资源使用的障碍的照顾者的回复进行了归纳分析,并形成了主要主题。样本包括 228 个 FI 阳性筛查家庭(65.7%)和 166 个 UI 阳性筛查家庭(47.8%)。完成访谈的( = 108)家庭中,有 77 名(71.3%)照顾者回忆起在孩子就诊期间提供了资源,但只有 33 名(42.9%)报告使用了这些资源。在使用资源的照顾者中,有 12 名(36.4%)确认他们的不安全状况仍然令人担忧。资源使用障碍出现了五个主要主题:(1)情况改善,(2)看法,(3)获取障碍,(4)优先事项冲突,(5)太忙/不知所措。大多数照顾者(95.7%的受访者)指出,他们的不安全状况导致压力增加,70.5%的受访者表示在与提供者讨论后压力水平降低。通过标准化的随访方案整合照顾者的投入,不仅可以提高提供的资源的质量和效果,还可以从照顾者的角度了解这些干预措施对不安全状况的影响。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验