Sachs T
Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1986;40:181-210.
Developmental patterns result from combinations of interactions and intracellular programmes. The purpose here is to define the roles of interactions wherever possible and to consider their major parameters, such as the timing of their action, their specificity and the distances over which they occur. The approach is one of a board survey, attempting to outline major interaction systems on the basis of information from different sources. The evidence concerning interactions that control development must come primarily from development itself. Both disturbed, as during regeneration and grafts, and normal development are relevant. Growing apices interact over relatively long distances. They reduce the development of similar apices and induce the development of axial tissues that connect them to the plant. Young shoot tissues also induce the development of root apices and vice versa. These various effects can be understood on the basis of a hormonal feedback involving auxins and cytokinins. Vascular differentiation, furthermore, is a cellular expression of these interactions. It occurs along the flow of auxin from the young tissues of the shoot towards the root apices. This flow is canalized by a positive feedback between cell polarization and the polar flow that both controls and results from this polarization. Structural relations between pholem and xylem, limitations of regeneration and the formation of rays all indicate the existence of additional, radial interactions. The fate of individual cells in development is varied and often follows no recognizable rules. This indicates interactions that operate on the size of a tissue or organ rather than on its precise cellular development. On the other hand, the continuity of plasmodesmata, wall thickenings and cytoplasmic strands demonstrate local interactions between neighbouring cells. It is concluded that, though the possibilities of developmental interactions may be bewildering, the list, when known, may not be all that long. The interactions specify orientation and quantity rather than the precise fate of cells. Their effects are gradual and they involve feedback loops. Growth factors, even known growth factors, play surprisingly large roles in cellular interactions. Such controls whose effect is gradual and general could provide a basis for developmental plasticity.
发育模式源于相互作用和细胞内程序的组合。本文的目的是尽可能界定相互作用的作用,并考虑其主要参数,如作用时间、特异性以及发生相互作用的距离。我们采用的方法是进行广泛的调查,试图根据来自不同来源的信息勾勒出主要的相互作用系统。有关控制发育的相互作用的证据必须主要来自发育本身。再生和移植过程中受到干扰的发育以及正常发育都是相关的。生长顶端在相对较长的距离上相互作用。它们会抑制相似顶端的发育,并诱导将它们与植物相连的轴向组织的发育。幼嫩的茎组织也会诱导根尖的发育,反之亦然。基于涉及生长素和细胞分裂素的激素反馈,可以理解这些不同的效应。此外,维管分化是这些相互作用的细胞表现形式。它沿着生长素从茎的幼嫩组织向根尖的流动方向发生。这种流动通过细胞极化与极性流动之间的正反馈而形成通道,而这种极化既控制这种流动又由其导致。韧皮部和木质部之间的结构关系、再生的局限性以及射线的形成都表明存在额外的径向相互作用。发育过程中单个细胞的命运各不相同,且往往没有可识别的规律可循。这表明相互作用是作用于组织或器官的大小而非其精确的细胞发育。另一方面,胞间连丝、细胞壁加厚和细胞质丝的连续性表明相邻细胞之间存在局部相互作用。可以得出结论,尽管发育相互作用的可能性可能令人困惑,但已知的相互作用种类可能并不多。这些相互作用决定了方向和数量,而非细胞的确切命运。它们的作用是渐进的,并且涉及反馈回路。生长因子,甚至是已知的生长因子,在细胞相互作用中发挥着惊人的重要作用。这种作用渐进且普遍的控制可为发育可塑性提供基础。