Suppr超能文献

接受抗病毒药物治疗的 COVID-19 患者的临床结局:一项回顾性分析。

Clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients treated with antivirals: a retrospective analysis.

机构信息

Niramaya Hospital, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai.

出版信息

J Assoc Physicians India. 2022 Apr;70(4):11-12.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Drug repurposing is considered as a rapid strategy for COVID-19 drug discovery and many drugs have been tried for treatment of COVID-19. Antivirals like favipiravir and remdesivir have become part of the COVID-19 Management Protocol by Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MOHFW) as well as Maharashtra State guidelines since beginning, after being approved by Drugs Controller General of India (DCGI). Although these drugs have shown promising results, their efficacy is still not proven completely and needs to be studied in large populations. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 treated with remdesivir and/or favipiravir.

MATERIAL

Retrospective analysis of medical records of 914 adult COVID-19 patients hospitalized in a tertiary care center in Mumbai was conducted. We assessed the following outcomes: severity of disease, need for oxygen supplementation, incidence of complications, discharge from hospital or death, oxygen requirement at the time of discharge, duration of hospital stay. These outcomes were compared between patients who received remdesivir only, patients who received favipiravir only, patients who received both remdesivir and favipiravir and patients who did not receive either remdesivir or favipiravir (control group).

OBSERVATION

Of total 914 patients in our study, 55.79% patients received only remdesivir, 13.45% received only favipiravir, 7.76% received remdesivir plus favipiravir and 22.97% did not receive any antivirals. Higher number of patients in remdesivir only group (60.19%) and remdesivir plus favipiravir groups (56.33%) required supplemental oxygen [vs 32.38 % patients in control group and 24.39% in favipiravir only group]. Highest number of patients (91.05%) in favipiravir only group got discharged under Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) guidelines closely followed by 88.73% in remdesivir plus favipiravir group, 88.43% in remdesivir only group and 82.38 % patients in control group. 8.43% patients in remdesivir only group, 6.5% in favipiravir only group, 7.04% in remdesivir plus favipiravir group and 10.47 % patients in control group needed oxygen support after discharge.

CONCLUSION

Majority of patients in our study got discharged under ICMR guidelines with higher proportion of patients in the treatment groups as compared to the control group. Also, lesser number of patients in the treatment groups required oxygen supplementation post discharge as compared to the control group.

摘要

未加标签

药物再利用被认为是 COVID-19 药物发现的快速策略,许多药物已被尝试用于 COVID-19 的治疗。抗病毒药物如法匹拉韦和瑞德西韦自开始以来一直被印度药品管理总局 (DCGI) 批准,成为卫生部和家庭福利部 (MOHFW) 以及马哈拉施特拉邦指南的 COVID-19 管理方案的一部分。尽管这些药物显示出有希望的结果,但它们的疗效尚未完全证明,需要在大人群中进行研究。我们研究的目的是评估接受瑞德西韦和/或法匹拉韦治疗的住院 COVID-19 患者的临床结果。

材料

对孟买一家三级保健中心收治的 914 名成年 COVID-19 患者的病历进行了回顾性分析。我们评估了以下结果:疾病严重程度、需要补充氧气、并发症发生率、出院或死亡、出院时的氧气需求、住院时间。将接受瑞德西韦治疗的患者、接受法匹拉韦治疗的患者、接受瑞德西韦和法匹拉韦治疗的患者和未接受瑞德西韦或法匹拉韦治疗的患者(对照组)之间的这些结果进行了比较。

观察

在我们的研究中,914 名患者中,55.79%的患者仅接受瑞德西韦治疗,13.45%的患者仅接受法匹拉韦治疗,7.76%的患者接受瑞德西韦加法匹拉韦治疗,22.97%的患者未接受任何抗病毒药物治疗。在仅接受瑞德西韦治疗的组(60.19%)和接受瑞德西韦加法匹拉韦治疗的组(56.33%)中,需要补充氧气的患者人数较多[而对照组和仅接受法匹拉韦治疗的组中,分别有 32.38%和 24.39%的患者需要补充氧气]。仅接受法匹拉韦治疗的组中,出院的患者人数最多(91.05%),其次是接受瑞德西韦加法匹拉韦治疗的组(88.73%)、仅接受瑞德西韦治疗的组(88.43%)和对照组(82.38%)。仅接受瑞德西韦治疗的组有 8.43%的患者、仅接受法匹拉韦治疗的组有 6.5%的患者、接受瑞德西韦加法匹拉韦治疗的组有 7.04%的患者和对照组有 10.47%的患者在出院后需要氧气支持。

结论

我们研究中的大多数患者根据 ICMR 指南出院,与对照组相比,治疗组中有更高比例的患者出院。此外,与对照组相比,治疗组中较少的患者在出院后需要补充氧气。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验