Communication Studies, University of Puget Sound.
Department of Communication, Columbus State University.
Health Commun. 2023 Oct;38(11):2271-2280. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2022.2063497. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
The purpose of this study is to foster an understanding of the safety, science, and political polarization issues public health officials (PHOs) must navigate in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This study analyzed posts on two social media outlets, Twitter and Reddit, to understand how political polarization impacted sensemaking around COVID-19. Qualitative analysis revealed that sensemaking around COVID-19 encompasses the following narratives: (a) the concept of public health is ambiguous, (b) political polarization causes burnout amongst PHOs, and (c) political polarization influences sensemaking. The conceptualization of politics was explored and the following themes were found: (d) politics can override public health decisions, (e) politics equates to death and other negative outcomes, (f) politics directly relates to the spreading of misinformation and disinformation, and (g) politics is used as a catch-all for sensemaking about issues in the pandemic that were viewed negatively. We then discuss the theoretical and practical implications of our findings.
本研究旨在深入了解公共卫生官员(PHO)在应对 COVID-19 大流行时必须应对的安全、科学和政治极化问题。本研究分析了两个社交媒体平台(Twitter 和 Reddit)上的帖子,以了解政治极化如何影响围绕 COVID-19 的意义建构。定性分析表明,围绕 COVID-19 的意义建构包括以下叙述:(a)公共卫生的概念是模糊的,(b)政治极化导致 PHO 倦怠,(c)政治极化影响意义建构。对政治的概念化进行了探讨,发现了以下主题:(d)政治可以凌驾于公共卫生决策之上,(e)政治等同于死亡和其他负面后果,(f)政治直接与错误信息和虚假信息的传播有关,(g)政治被用作对大流行中被视为负面的问题进行意义建构的万能解释。然后,我们讨论了我们研究结果的理论和实践意义。