Ling Wei-Li, Su Chinh Tran-To, Lua Wai-Heng, Yeo Joshua Yi, Poh Jun-Jie, Ng Yuen-Ling, Wipat Anil, Gan Samuel Ken-En
Antibody & Product Development Lab, Experimental Drug Development Centre, Bioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), Singapore, Singapore.
Newcastle University Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Sci Rep. 2022 Apr 20;12(1):6510. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10388-5.
Interest in IgA as an alternative antibody format has increased over the years with much remaining to be investigated in relation to interactions with immune cells. Considering the recent whole antibody investigations showing significant distal effects between the variable (V) and constant (C)- regions that can be mitigated by the hinge regions of both human IgA subtypes A1 and A2, we performed an in-depth mechanistic investigation using a panel of 28 IgA1s and A2s of both Trastuzumab and Pertuzumab models. FcαRI binding were found to be mitigated by the differing glycosylation patterns in IgA1 and 2 with contributions from the CDRs. On their interactions with antigen-Her2 and superantigens PpL, SpG and SpA, PpL was found to sterically hinder Her2 antigen binding with unexpected findings of IgAs binding SpG at the CH2-3 region alongside SpA interacting with IgAs at the CH1. Although the VH3 framework (FWR) is commonly used in CDR grafting, we found the VH1 framework (FWR) to be a possible alternative when grafting IgA1 and 2 owing to its stronger binding to antigen Her2 and weaker interactions to superantigen Protein L and A. These findings lay the foundation to understanding the interactions between IgAs and microbial superantigens, and also guide the engineering of IgAs for future antibody applications and targeting of superantigen-producing microbes.
多年来,人们对IgA作为一种替代抗体形式的兴趣与日俱增,但其与免疫细胞相互作用的诸多方面仍有待研究。鉴于最近的全抗体研究表明,人IgA1和A2亚型的可变区(V)和恒定区(C)之间存在显著的远端效应,而这种效应可通过铰链区得到缓解,我们使用一组28种曲妥珠单抗和帕妥珠单抗模型的IgA1和A2进行了深入的机制研究。研究发现,IgA1和IgA2中不同的糖基化模式以及互补决定区(CDR)的作用可减轻FcαRI的结合。在它们与抗原Her2以及超抗原PpL、SpG和SpA的相互作用中,发现PpL在空间上阻碍了Her2抗原的结合,同时有意外发现,IgA在CH2-3区域结合SpG,而SpA在CH1区域与IgA相互作用。尽管VH3构架(FWR)常用于CDR移植,但我们发现,在移植IgA1和IgA2时,VH1构架(FWR)可能是一种替代选择,因为它与抗原Her2的结合更强,与超抗原蛋白L和A的相互作用较弱。这些发现为理解IgA与微生物超抗原之间的相互作用奠定了基础,也为未来抗体应用中IgA的工程改造以及针对产生超抗原的微生物的靶向治疗提供了指导。