• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:一位外科医生连续527例患者的经验

Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 527 Consecutive Patients.

作者信息

Bedirli Abdulkadir, Yavuz Aydin, Dikmen Kursat, Buyukkasap Cagri, Ozaydin Safa

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00072.

DOI:10.4293/JSLS.2021.00072
PMID:35444400
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8993462/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Robotic bariatric surgery is increasingly adopted by surgeons. We present the surgical results of 527 consecutive patients who underwent robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) using the standard technique.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database was performed including 527 consecutive patients who underwent robotic RYGB between January 1, 2018 and December 31, 2021.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 41 years, with a male/female sex distribution of 143/384 (27.1%/72.9%). Type 2 diabetes in the pre-operative period was diagnosed in 31% of patients. The median pre-operative body mass index (BMI) was 44.6 kg/m (range, 35-64). The mean operation time was 134 min for robotic RYGB, including the docking process. Early (< 30 days) complications included ileus (0.2%), atelectasis (0.2%), thromboembolic (0.2%) events, and surgical-site infection (0.2%). No leakage or bleeding of the gastrojejunal and jejunojejunal anastomoses were recorded. Oral food intake was begun at 1.8 days on average. The average hospital stay was 2 days. Despite a range of BMI values, operation times and gastrojejunal anastomosis times did not show significant differences. There were no significant differences in mean operation time or mean gastrojejunal anastomosis time over the years.

CONCLUSIONS

The robotic approach is effective and safe for patients undergoing RYGB. This technique provides satisfactory results with short-term surgical outcomes. However, the real benefits of robotic RYGB should be further evaluated by well-conducted randomized trials. Even in difficult cases with higher BMI values, optimal operation times and similar operative efficiency can be obtained if a standard operation technique is applied.

摘要

背景与目的

机器人减肥手术越来越受到外科医生的青睐。我们展示了527例连续接受机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术(RYGB)的患者的手术结果,采用的是标准技术。

方法

对一个前瞻性维护的数据库进行回顾性分析,纳入了2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间连续接受机器人辅助RYGB的527例患者。

结果

患者的平均年龄为41岁,男女比例为143/384(27.1%/72.9%)。31%的患者在术前被诊断为2型糖尿病。术前体重指数(BMI)中位数为44.6kg/m²(范围35 - 64)。机器人辅助RYGB的平均手术时间为134分钟,包括对接过程。早期(<30天)并发症包括肠梗阻(0.2%)、肺不张(0.2%)、血栓栓塞事件(0.2%)和手术部位感染(0.2%)。未记录胃空肠和空肠空肠吻合口的渗漏或出血情况。平均1.8天开始经口进食。平均住院时间为2天。尽管BMI值范围不同,但手术时间和胃空肠吻合时间并无显著差异。多年来平均手术时间或平均胃空肠吻合时间也无显著差异。

结论

机器人辅助手术对于接受RYGB的患者是有效且安全的。该技术在短期手术结果方面提供了令人满意的效果。然而,机器人辅助RYGB的真正益处应通过精心设计的随机试验进一步评估。即使在BMI值较高的困难病例中,如果应用标准手术技术,也可获得最佳手术时间和相似的手术效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/48182e572796/LS-JSLS220004F014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/0e949be07273/LS-JSLS220004F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/127748c52e0e/LS-JSLS220004F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/4f5a90e5829d/LS-JSLS220004F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/3a6be986952c/LS-JSLS220004F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/c6e9b9bfc20c/LS-JSLS220004F005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/42ad07a34149/LS-JSLS220004F006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/32f57d3b5c3c/LS-JSLS220004F007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/974027a8b82b/LS-JSLS220004F008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/e07ea8e887ab/LS-JSLS220004F009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/e301ed8c8dd3/LS-JSLS220004F010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/9a5576581e2d/LS-JSLS220004F011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/7584faba305e/LS-JSLS220004F012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/64f3c726245c/LS-JSLS220004F013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/48182e572796/LS-JSLS220004F014.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/0e949be07273/LS-JSLS220004F001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/127748c52e0e/LS-JSLS220004F002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/4f5a90e5829d/LS-JSLS220004F003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/3a6be986952c/LS-JSLS220004F004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/c6e9b9bfc20c/LS-JSLS220004F005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/42ad07a34149/LS-JSLS220004F006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/32f57d3b5c3c/LS-JSLS220004F007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/974027a8b82b/LS-JSLS220004F008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/e07ea8e887ab/LS-JSLS220004F009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/e301ed8c8dd3/LS-JSLS220004F010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/9a5576581e2d/LS-JSLS220004F011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/7584faba305e/LS-JSLS220004F012.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/64f3c726245c/LS-JSLS220004F013.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/45ea/8993462/48182e572796/LS-JSLS220004F014.jpg

相似文献

1
Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass: A Single Surgeon's Experience with 527 Consecutive Patients.机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:一位外科医生连续527例患者的经验
JSLS. 2022 Jan-Mar;26(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2021.00072.
2
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for super obese patients: what approach?针对超级肥胖患者的Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:采用何种方法?
Int J Med Robot. 2016 Jun;12(2):276-82. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1660. Epub 2015 Apr 19.
3
Totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路手术。
Arch Surg. 2005 Aug;140(8):779-86. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.140.8.779.
4
Laparoscopic, hybrid, and totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.腹腔镜、杂交及全机器人Roux-en-Y胃旁路术
J Robot Surg. 2016 Mar;10(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s11701-016-0559-y. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
5
Outcomes of totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass in patients with BMI ≥ 50 kg/m: can the robot level out "traditional" risk factors?体质量指数(BMI)≥50kg/m²患者行全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的结局:机器人能否消除“传统”风险因素?
J Robot Surg. 2023 Dec;17(6):2881-2888. doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01729-1. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
6
Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis using the 2015-2016 MBSAQIP database.机器人辅助与腹腔镜 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术和袖状胃切除术:使用 2015-2016 MBSAQIP 数据库进行倾向评分匹配的比较分析。
Surg Endosc. 2019 May;33(5):1600-1612. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6422-7. Epub 2018 Sep 17.
7
Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective, single-center study of early perioperative outcomes at a community hospital.腹腔镜与机器人辅助Roux-en-Y胃旁路手术:社区医院早期围手术期结局的回顾性单中心研究
Surg Endosc. 2016 Sep;30(9):3792-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4675-y. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Does Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Provide Outcome Advantages over Standard Laparoscopic Approaches?机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术是否比标准腹腔镜方法具有优势?
Obes Surg. 2018 Sep;28(9):2589-2596. doi: 10.1007/s11695-018-3228-6.
9
Robotic Roux en Y gastric bypass can be safe and cost-effective in a rural setting: clinical outcomes from a community hospital bariatric program.机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术在农村地区是安全且具有成本效益的:来自社区医院减重计划的临床结果。
J Robot Surg. 2021 Dec;15(6):929-936. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01193-9. Epub 2021 Jan 28.
10
Technical aspects and standardization of the totally robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Results of a single surgeon experience with a 5-year follow-up.全机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术的技术方面和标准化。一位外科医生 5 年随访的经验结果。
Acta Chir Belg. 2022 Jun;122(3):169-177. doi: 10.1080/00015458.2021.1889134. Epub 2021 Feb 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Primary Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass with Concurrent Paraesophageal Hernia Repair in Obese Patients.肥胖患者同期行原发性Roux-en-Y胃旁路术与食管旁疝修补术
JSLS. 2025 Jan-Mar;29(1). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2024.00062. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
A Systematic Review to Summarise and Appraise the Reporting of Surgical Innovation: a Case Study in Robotic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.系统评价总结和评估手术创新的报告:以机器人 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术为例
Obes Surg. 2024 Aug;34(8):3058-3070. doi: 10.1007/s11695-024-07329-8. Epub 2024 Jun 19.
3
Assessment of predictors of early postoperative complications after primary robotically assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

本文引用的文献

1
Medium/long term evaluation of lipid profile after bariatric surgery (gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy).减重手术后(胃旁路术与胃袖状切除术)血脂谱的中长期评估。
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2021 Jun-Jul;68(6):372-380. doi: 10.1016/j.endien.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Oct 26.
2
Understanding the Current Role of Robotic-Assisted Bariatric Surgery.理解机器人辅助减重手术的当前作用。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jul;31(7):3130-3137. doi: 10.1007/s11695-021-05375-0. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
3
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Still the Gold Standard?
原发性机器人辅助 Roux-en-Y 胃旁路术后早期术后并发症预测因素的评估:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Apr;37(4):2851-2857. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09766-x. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
腹腔镜胃旁路手术:仍是金标准吗?
Surg Clin North Am. 2021 Apr;101(2):161-175. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.12.013.
4
Trends in Utilization and Perioperative Outcomes in Robotic-assisted Bariatric surgery using the MBSAQIP database: A 4-Year Analysis.利用 MBSAQIP 数据库分析 4 年来机器人辅助减重手术的利用趋势和围手术期结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Feb;31(2):854-861. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-05055-5. Epub 2020 Nov 9.
5
Elective robotic-assisted bariatric surgery: Is it worth the money? A national database analysis.择期机器人辅助减重手术:它物有所值吗?一项全国数据库分析。
Am J Surg. 2020 Dec;220(6):1445-1450. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.08.040. Epub 2020 Aug 31.
6
Evolving Trends in North American Gastric Bypass Delivery: a Retrospective MBSAQIP Analysis of Technical Factors and Outcomes from 2015 to 2018.北美胃旁路手术交付方式的演变趋势:2015 年至 2018 年 MBSAQIP 回顾性分析技术因素和结果。
Obes Surg. 2021 Jan;31(1):151-158. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04889-3. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
7
Trends in the utilization and perioperative outcomes of primary robotic bariatric surgery from 2015 to 2018: a study of 46,764 patients from the MBSAQIP data registry.2015 年至 2018 年原发性机器人减重手术利用和围手术期结果的趋势:来自 MBSAQIP 数据登记处的 46764 例患者的研究。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3915-3922. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07839-3. Epub 2020 Jul 31.
8
Gastroesophageal Reflux and Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: Results of the First International Consensus Conference.胃食管反流与腹腔镜袖状胃切除术:首届国际共识会议结果。
Obes Surg. 2020 Oct;30(10):3695-3705. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04749-0. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
9
The Longitudinal Efficiency of Robotic Surgery: an MBSAQIP Propensity Matched 4-Year Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Bariatric Surgery.机器人手术的纵向效率:MBSAQIP 倾向匹配的 4 年机器人与腹腔镜减重手术比较。
Obes Surg. 2020 Oct;30(10):3706-3713. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04712-z.
10
Evolution of outcomes of robotic bariatric surgery: first report based on MBSAQIP database.机器人减重手术结局的演变:基于 MBSAQIP 数据库的首次报告。
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2020 Jul;16(7):916-922. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Mar 23.