Goseki Toshiaki, Kunimi Keiko, Shioya Naoko, Iijima Yuka, Sebe Manami, Hosoya Karin, Fukaya Kyo
Atami Hospital, Shizuoka, Japan.
Kitasato University, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Eye Mov Res. 2022 Mar 6;15(1). doi: 10.16910/jemr.15.1.5. eCollection 2022.
This study compared the time required to produce nine-directional ocular photographs using the conventional method to that using the newly devised 9Gaze application. In total, 20 healthy adults, 10 adult patients with strabismus, and 10 pediatric patients with amblyopia or strabismus had their ocular photographs taken using a digital camera with PowerPoint 2010, and with an iPad, and iPod touch with 9Gaze. Photographs of 10 healthy patients were taken by orthoptists with <1 year of experience, and the other participants had theirs taken by those with >1 year of experience. The required time was compared between the three devices in all patients and the two orthoptist groups in 20 healthy adults (>1 year and <1 year of experience). The required times were significantly different between the devices: 515.5 ± 187.0 sec with the digital camera, 117.4 ± 17.8 sec with the iPad, and 76.3 ± 14.1 sec with the iPod touch. The required time with the digital camera was significantly different between the two orthoptist groups (404.7 ± 150.8 vs. 626.3 ± 154.2 sec, =0.007). The use of the 9Gaze application shortened the recording time required. Furthermore, 9Gaze can be used without considering the years of experience of the examiner.
本研究比较了使用传统方法和新设计的9Gaze应用程序拍摄九个方向眼部照片所需的时间。总共20名健康成年人、10名成年斜视患者和10名患有弱视或斜视的儿科患者使用配备PowerPoint 2010的数码相机、iPad以及装有9Gaze的iPod touch拍摄了眼部照片。10名健康患者的照片由经验不足1年的视光师拍摄,其他参与者的照片由经验超过1年的视光师拍摄。比较了所有患者中三种设备之间以及20名健康成年人中两个视光师组(经验超过1年和经验不足1年)之间所需的时间。不同设备所需时间存在显著差异:数码相机为515.5±187.0秒,iPad为117.4±17.8秒,iPod touch为76.3±14.1秒。数码相机所需时间在两个视光师组之间存在显著差异(404.7±150.8秒与626.3±154.2秒,P = 0.007)。9Gaze应用程序的使用缩短了所需的记录时间。此外,使用9Gaze无需考虑检查者的经验年限。