Pantalacci T, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E
Groupement Hospitalier Nord-Dauphiné, Centre Hospitalier Pierre Oudot, Service d'anesthésie, Bourgoin-Jallieu, France.
Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Service de réanimation médicale, Pierre-Bénite, France.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2023 Feb;37(1):83-91. doi: 10.1007/s10877-022-00861-x. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
This study was designed to investigate qCON and qNOX variations during outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy using remifentanil and desflurane without muscle relaxants and compare these indices with ANI and MAC. Adult patients undergoing outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in this prospective observational study. Maintenance of anesthesia was performed using remifentanil targeted to ANI 50-80 and desflurane targeted to MAC 0.8-1.2 without muscle relaxants. The ANI, qCON and qNOX and desflurane MAC values were collected at different time-points and analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. The relationship between ANI and qNOX and between qCON and MAC were analyzed by linear regression. The ANI was comprised between 50 and 80 during maintenance of anesthesia. Higher values of qNOX and qCON were observed at induction and extubation than during all other time-points where they were comprised between 40 and 60. A poor but significant negative linear relationship (r = 0.07, p < 0.001) was observed between ANI and qNOX. There also was a negative linear relationship between qCON and MAC (r = 0.48, p < 0.001) and between qNOX and remifentanil infusion rate (r = 0.13, p < 0.001). The linear mixed-effect regression correlation (r) was 0.65 for ANI-qNOX and 0.96 for qCON-MAC. The qCON and qNOX monitoring seems informative during general anesthesia using desflurane and remifentanil without muscle relaxants in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. While qCON correlated with MAC, the correlation of overall qCON and ANI was poor but significant. Additionally, the qNOX weakly correlated with the remifentanil infusion rate. This observational study suggests that the proposed ranges of 40-60 for both indexes may correspond to adequate levels of hypnosis and analgesia during general anesthesia, although this should be confirmed by further research.
本研究旨在调查在门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术中使用瑞芬太尼和地氟醚且不使用肌肉松弛剂时qCON和qNOX的变化,并将这些指标与ANI和MAC进行比较。本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了接受门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的成年患者。麻醉维持采用靶向ANI 50 - 80的瑞芬太尼和靶向MAC 0.8 - 1.2的地氟醚,不使用肌肉松弛剂。在不同时间点收集ANI、qCON和qNOX以及地氟醚MAC值,并使用重复测量方差分析进行分析。通过线性回归分析ANI与qNOX之间以及qCON与MAC之间的关系。麻醉维持期间ANI在50至80之间。与所有其他时间点(40至60之间)相比,诱导期和拔管期观察到更高的qNOX和qCON值。观察到ANI与qNOX之间存在较弱但显著的负线性关系(r = 0.07,p < 0.001)。qCON与MAC之间(r = 0.48,p < 0.001)以及qNOX与瑞芬太尼输注速率之间(r = 0.13,p < 0.001)也存在负线性关系。ANI - qNOX的线性混合效应回归相关性(r)为0.65,qCON - MAC为0.96。在接受门诊腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者中不使用肌肉松弛剂而使用地氟醚和瑞芬太尼进行全身麻醉期间,qCON和qNOX监测似乎具有参考价值。虽然qCON与MAC相关,但总体qCON与ANI的相关性较弱但显著。此外,qNOX与瑞芬太尼输注速率弱相关。这项观察性研究表明,尽管这需要进一步研究证实,但这两个指标提议的40 - 60范围可能对应全身麻醉期间适当的催眠和镇痛水平