Suppr超能文献

联合药物治疗变应性鼻炎:系统评价与荟萃分析

Combined medical therapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis: Systematic review and meta-analyses.

作者信息

Chitsuthipakorn Wirach, Hoang Minh P, Kanjanawasee Dichapong, Seresirikachorn Kachorn, Snidvongs Kornkiat

机构信息

Center of Excellence in Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rajavithi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

College of Medicine, Rangsit University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2022 Dec;12(12):1480-1502. doi: 10.1002/alr.23015. Epub 2022 May 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antihistamines (ATH) and intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) are primary treatments for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). When monotherapy of either primary treatment fails to control symptoms, combined medical therapy is an option. In this meta-analysis we assessed the additional effects of different medical combinations compared with primary treatments.

METHODS

Systematic searches on PubMed and EMBASE were updated on November 4, 2021. Randomized, controlled trials comparing the effects of combinations with monotherapy were included. There were 7 comparisons: (1) ATH-decongestant vs ATH; (2) ATH-leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) vs ATH; (3) INCS-ATH vs INCS; (4) INCS-LTRA vs INCS; (5) INCS-decongestion vs INCS; (6) INCS-saline irrigation vs INCS; and (7) ATH-saline irrigation vs ATH. Data were pooled for meta-analysis. Outcomes were composite nasal symptom score, composite ocular symptom score, quality of life (QoL), and adverse events.

RESULTS

Fifty-three studies were included. Compared with ATH alone, the ATH-decongestant combination improved composite nasal symptoms; ATH-LTRA improved nasal symptoms in patients with perennial AR; and ATH-nasal saline improved both symptoms and QoL. Compared with INCS alone, the INCS-intranasal ATH combination improved nasal symptoms, ocular symptoms, and QoL; INCS-LTRA improved ocular symptoms but not nasal symptoms; and INCS-nasal saline improved QoL but not symptoms. There were no additional effects observed from adding oral ATH or topical decongestant to INCS.

CONCLUSION

After ATH monotherapy fails to control symptoms, addition of decongestant, saline, or LTRA can improve the outcomes. When INCS monotherapy is ineffective, addition of intranasal ATH can improve nasal symptoms; LTRA can improve ocular symptoms, and saline irrigation can improve QoL.

摘要

背景

抗组胺药(ATH)和鼻用糖皮质激素(INCS)是过敏性鼻炎(AR)患者的主要治疗方法。当单一主要治疗无法控制症状时,联合药物治疗是一种选择。在这项荟萃分析中,我们评估了不同药物组合与主要治疗相比的额外效果。

方法

2021年11月4日更新了对PubMed和EMBASE的系统检索。纳入了比较联合治疗与单一治疗效果的随机对照试验。共有7项比较:(1)ATH-减充血剂对比ATH;(2)ATH-白三烯受体拮抗剂(LTRA)对比ATH;(3)INCS-ATH对比INCS;(4)INCS-LTRA对比INCS;(5)INCS-减充血剂对比INCS;(6)INCS-盐水冲洗对比INCS;以及(7)ATH-盐水冲洗对比ATH。对数据进行汇总以进行荟萃分析。结局指标为综合鼻症状评分、综合眼症状评分、生活质量(QoL)和不良事件。

结果

纳入了53项研究。与单独使用ATH相比,ATH-减充血剂组合改善了综合鼻症状;ATH-LTRA改善了常年性AR患者的鼻症状;ATH-鼻用盐水改善了症状和生活质量。与单独使用INCS相比,INCS-鼻内ATH组合改善了鼻症状、眼症状和生活质量;INCS-LTRA改善了眼症状但未改善鼻症状;INCS-鼻用盐水改善了生活质量但未改善症状。在INCS中添加口服ATH或局部减充血剂未观察到额外效果。

结论

ATH单一治疗无法控制症状时,添加减充血剂、盐水或LTRA可改善结局。当INCS单一治疗无效时,添加鼻内ATH可改善鼻症状;LTRA可改善眼症状,盐水冲洗可改善生活质量

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验