Vieira Rafael José, Torres Maria Inês, Bognanni Antonio, Gil-Mata Sara, Ferreira-da-Silva Renato, Lourenço-Silva Nuno, Cardoso-Fernandes António, Ferreira André, Ferreira-Cardoso Henrique, Teles João, Campos-Lopes Miguel, Fonseca João A, Yepes-Nuñez Juan José, Klimek Ludger, Zuberbier Torsten, Schünemann Holger, Bousquet Jean, Sousa-Pinto Bernardo
MEDCIDS - Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences.
CINTESIS@RISE - Health Research Network, MEDCIDS, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Allergol Select. 2024 Jul 22;8:270-277. doi: 10.5414/ALX02515E. eCollection 2024.
There is insufficient evidence regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of pharmacological treatments of allergic rhinitis (AR). In the context of informing the 2024 revision of the Allergic Rhinitis and its Impact on Asthma (ARIA) guidelines, we plan to perform three systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the desirable and undesirable effects (i) between intranasal and oral medications for AR; (ii) between combinations of intranasal and oral medications versus nasal or oral medications alone; and (iii) among different intranasal specific medications. We will search four electronic bibliographic databases and three clinical trials databases for RCTs examining patients ≥ 12 years old with seasonal or perennial AR. Assessed outcomes will include the Total Nasal Symptom Score, the Total Ocular Symptom Score, and the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire. We will assess the methodological quality of included primary studies by using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. If appropriate, we will perform a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis for each pair of assessed medication classes and outcomes, as well as a network meta-analysis to assess the comparative efficacy of intranasal medications among each other. Heterogeneity will be explored by sensitivity and subgroup analyses. This set of systematic reviews will allow for a comprehensive assessment of the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological interventions for AR and inform recommendations in the context of the ARIA guidelines.
关于变应性鼻炎(AR)药物治疗的比较疗效和安全性,证据不足。在为《变应性鼻炎及其对哮喘的影响》(ARIA)指南2024年修订提供信息的背景下,我们计划对随机对照试验(RCT)进行三项系统评价,比较(i)AR鼻内用药和口服药之间的有益和不良影响;(ii)鼻内和口服药联合用药与单独使用鼻内或口服药之间的有益和不良影响;以及(iii)不同鼻内特异性药物之间的有益和不良影响。我们将在四个电子文献数据库和三个临床试验数据库中检索针对≥12岁季节性或常年性AR患者的RCT。评估的结局将包括总鼻症状评分、总眼症状评分和鼻结膜炎生活质量问卷。我们将使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估纳入的原始研究的方法学质量。如果合适,我们将对每对评估的药物类别和结局进行成对随机效应荟萃分析,以及进行网状荟萃分析以评估鼻内药物之间的比较疗效。将通过敏感性分析和亚组分析探索异质性。这组系统评价将全面评估AR药物干预的有效性和安全性,并为ARIA指南中的建议提供依据。