• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对分期侧方腰椎椎间融合术后并发症进行更现实评估:一项单机构研究系列

Towards a More Realistic Appraisal of Complications Following Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single Institution Series.

作者信息

Godolias Periklis, Frieler Sven, Tataryn Zachary L, McBride Paul, Nunna Ravi, Ghayoumi Pouriya, Charlot Kaarina, Tran Angela, Al-Awadi Hamzah, Gerstmeyer Julius R, Ruetten Sebastian, Chapman Jens R, Oskouian Rod J

机构信息

Seattle Science Foundation, Seattle, WA, USA.

Department of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, BG University Hospital Bergmannsheil, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):130-137. doi: 10.1177/21925682221096621. Epub 2022 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1177/21925682221096621
PMID:35446693
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10676158/
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

With steadily increasing implementation of far lateral approaches in spine surgery, surgeons can utilize the advantages of different approaches synergistically to ensure an optimal patient outcome. Our single institution study aimed to assess the complication rates of patients who underwent a lateral interbody fusion as the index procedure and additional anterior or posterior instrumentation as part of a planned staged surgical reconstruction effort.

METHODS

This study was approved by our institutional review board (STUDY2021000113). We included 576 patients who received a lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) as the index procedure followed by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) between 2016 and 2020. Primary outcomes were complications identified during the initial inpatient stay, which were categorized into approach-related and secondary complications. Secondary outcomes tracked up to 6 years post-surgery.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 19.2% (10.5% approach related, 8.7% secondary complications). Significant intraoperative hemorrhage (mean 659.3 mL vs 131.4 mL, < .01) was the most common approach related complication with an incidence of 4%, followed by temporary hip flexor weakness in 2.6%. A permanent (femoral) nerve damage was verified in 1 patient. The most common secondary complication was impaired wound healing in 12 patients (2.1%). We identified a 7.1% (41 of 576 patients) rate of revision surgery, on average after 372 days (±34 days).

CONCLUSIONS

We recorded an overall complication rate of 19.2% for staged adult deformity corrective surgeries utilizing far lateral interbody fusions at several lumbar levels followed by a more comprehensive posterior surgical reconstruction.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

随着脊柱手术中极外侧入路的应用不断增加,外科医生可以协同利用不同入路的优势,以确保患者获得最佳治疗效果。我们的单机构研究旨在评估接受外侧椎间融合作为索引手术,并作为计划分期手术重建一部分进行额外前路或后路内固定的患者的并发症发生率。

方法

本研究经我们的机构审查委员会批准(研究编号:STUDY2021000113)。我们纳入了576例患者,这些患者在2016年至2020年间接受了腰椎外侧椎间融合(LLIF)作为索引手术,随后接受了经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合(TLIF)、后路腰椎椎间融合(PLIF)或前路腰椎椎间融合(ALIF)。主要结局是在初次住院期间发现的并发症,分为与入路相关的并发症和继发性并发症。次要结局追踪至术后6年。

结果

总体并发症发生率为19.2%(与入路相关的为10.5%,继发性并发症为8.7%)。术中大出血(平均659.3毫升对131.4毫升,P<0.01)是最常见的与入路相关的并发症,发生率为4%,其次是临时髋屈肌无力,发生率为2.6%。1例患者被证实存在永久性(股)神经损伤。最常见的继发性并发症是12例患者(2.1%)伤口愈合受损。我们发现翻修手术率为7.1%(576例患者中的41例),平均在372天(±34天)后进行。

结论

我们记录了在多个腰椎节段采用极外侧椎间融合并随后进行更全面的后路手术重建的分期成人畸形矫正手术的总体并发症发生率为19.2%。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/36c9af52b39e/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/43ac5d9a24b7/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/fc7692f32b4a/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/36c9af52b39e/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/43ac5d9a24b7/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/fc7692f32b4a/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c02b/10676158/36c9af52b39e/10.1177_21925682221096621-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Towards a More Realistic Appraisal of Complications Following Staged Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Single Institution Series.对分期侧方腰椎椎间融合术后并发症进行更现实评估:一项单机构研究系列
Global Spine J. 2024 Jan;14(1):130-137. doi: 10.1177/21925682221096621. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
2
The feasibility of computer-assisted 3D navigation in multiple-level lateral lumbar interbody fusion in combination with posterior instrumentation for adult spinal deformity.计算机辅助三维导航在成人脊柱畸形后路内固定联合多节段侧路腰椎间融合术中的可行性。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E4. doi: 10.3171/2020.5.FOCUS20353.
3
Comparative analysis of 3 surgical strategies for adult spinal deformity with mild to moderate sagittal imbalance.成人脊柱畸形伴轻至中度矢状面失衡的三种手术策略的比较分析
J Neurosurg Spine. 2018 Jan;28(1):40-49. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.SPINE161370. Epub 2017 Nov 3.
4
Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术与腰椎外侧椎体间融合术并发症发生率的比较:文献系统综述
Neurosurg Focus. 2015 Oct;39(4):E4. doi: 10.3171/2015.7.FOCUS15278.
5
Longitudinal Trends of Patient Demographics and Morbidity of Different Approaches in Lumbar Interbody Fusion: An Analysis Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database.腰椎体间融合术不同方法患者特征和发病率的纵向趋势:利用美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划数据库进行的分析。
World Neurosurg. 2022 Aug;164:e183-e193. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.04.067. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
6
Impact of lumbar interbody fusion surgery on postoperative outcomes in patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation: Analysis of the US national inpatient sample.腰椎体间融合术对复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者术后结局的影响:美国国家住院患者样本分析。
J Clin Neurosci. 2019 Dec;70:20-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2019.10.001. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
7
Lateral lumbar interbody fusion in revision surgery for restenosis after posterior decompression.后路减压术后再狭窄翻修手术中的侧方腰椎体间融合术。
Neurosurg Focus. 2020 Sep;49(3):E11. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.FOCUS20361.
8
The impact of interbody approach and lumbar level on segmental, adjacent, and sagittal alignment in degenerative lumbar pathology: a radiographic analysis six months following surgery.后路入路和腰椎节段对退行性腰椎病变节段、邻近节段和矢状面排列的影响:术后 6 个月的影像学分析。
Spine J. 2022 Aug;22(8):1318-1324. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.03.010. Epub 2022 Mar 26.
9
Approach-based Comparative and Predictor Analysis of 30-day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the ACS-NSQIP Dataset.基于方法的 30 天再入院、再手术和发病率的比较分析,以及使用 ACS-NSQIP 数据集行腰椎体间融合术的患者。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 15;44(6):432-441. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002850.
10
Comparative Analysis of Inpatient Opioid Consumption Between Different Surgical Approaches Following Single Level Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery.单节段腰椎融合手术后不同手术方式住院期间阿片类药物消耗量的比较分析
Global Spine J. 2023 Oct;13(8):2508-2515. doi: 10.1177/21925682221089244. Epub 2022 Apr 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Defining cage subsidence in anterior, oblique, and lateral lumbar spine fusion approaches: a systematic review of the literature.定义前路、斜外侧路和后路腰椎融合术中的 cage 沉降:文献系统综述。
Neurosurg Rev. 2024 Jul 16;47(1):332. doi: 10.1007/s10143-024-02551-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical results and complications associated with oblique lumbar interbody fusion technique.与斜外侧腰椎椎间融合技术相关的临床结果及并发症
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Jan;9(1):16. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-2159.
2
Comparison of Different Approaches in Lumbosacral Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.腰骶部脊柱融合手术中不同方法的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Asian Spine J. 2022 Feb;16(1):141-149. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0405. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
3
Complications associated with L4-5 anterior retroperitoneal trans-psoas interbody fusion: a single institution series.
L4-5 前路腹膜后经腰大肌椎间融合术相关并发症:单机构系列研究
J Spine Surg. 2020 Sep;6(3):562-571. doi: 10.21037/jss-20-579.
4
The History of Anterior and Lateral Approaches to the Lumbar Spine.腰椎前路和侧路入路的历史。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Dec;144:213-221. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.083. Epub 2020 Sep 19.
5
Interbody Fusions in the Lumbar Spine: A Review.腰椎椎间融合术综述
HSS J. 2020 Jul;16(2):162-167. doi: 10.1007/s11420-019-09737-4. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
6
Review of Risks and Complications of Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF).极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF)的风险与并发症综述
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Dec 6;10:237. doi: 10.25259/SNI_559_2019. eCollection 2019.
7
Many Intraoperative Monitoring Modalities Have Been Developed To Limit Injury During Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF/MIS XLIF): Does That Mean XLIF/MIS XLIF Are Unsafe?为限制极外侧椎间融合术(XLIF/微创XLIF)过程中的损伤,已开发出多种术中监测方式:这是否意味着XLIF/微创XLIF不安全?
Surg Neurol Int. 2019 Nov 29;10:233. doi: 10.25259/SNI_563_2019. eCollection 2019.
8
Comparison of Lumbar Laminectomy Alone, Lumbar Laminectomy and Fusion, Stand-alone Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion, and Stand-alone Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Treatment of Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Review of the Literature.单纯腰椎椎板切除术、腰椎椎板切除术与融合术、单独前路腰椎椎间融合术及单独外侧腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较:文献综述
Cureus. 2019 Sep 18;11(9):e5691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.5691.
9
Lumbar spinal fusion in the outpatient setting: an update on management, surgical approaches and planning.门诊环境下的腰椎融合术:管理、手术入路及规划的最新进展
J Spine Surg. 2019 Sep;5(Suppl 2):S174-S180. doi: 10.21037/jss.2019.04.14.
10
Outcome After Extreme Lateral Transpsoas Approach: Corpectomies Versus Interbody Fusion.极外侧经椎间孔入路治疗的结果:椎体切除术与椎体间融合术的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2019 Nov;131:e170-e175. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.102. Epub 2019 Jul 19.