Masuda Ken, Ishiki Hiroto, Yokomichi Naosuke, Yamaguchi Takuhiro, Ito Tetsuya, Takatsu Hana, Amano Koji, Hiramoto Shuji, Yamauchi Toshihiro, Kawaguchi Takashi, Mori Masanori, Matsuda Yosuke, Yamaguchi Takashi
Department of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Department of Palliative Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Jul;30(7):6233-6241. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07057-8. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
Paracentesis is among the most widely utilized treatments for malignant ascites (MA). However, paracentesis in patients with MA has the potential to be associated with life-shortening effects. Thus, this study aimed to investigate whether paracentesis affected the duration of survival in such patients.
We performed a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicenter observational study investigating the dying process and end-of-life care in patients with terminal cancer, admitted to 23 palliative care units in Japan. Survival duration was compared between patients who did (paracentesis group) and did not undergo paracentesis (non-paracentesis group). We used inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) to control for baseline covariates between groups.
Among the 1896 initially enrolled patients, 568 with ascites were included in the study cohort. Eighty-five (15.0%) patients underwent paracentesis. The primary tumor site was the pancreas (51.9%, n = 295), followed by the gastrointestinal tract (22.7%, n = 129). Non-adjusted median durations of survival were 22 days (95% confidence interval [CI]: 16-25) and 12 days (95% CI: 11-13) in the paracentesis and non-paracentesis groups, respectively (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.54-0.88; p = 0.003). The IPTW-adjusted median survival durations were 22 (95% CI: 16-25) and 16 days (95% CI: 12-22) in the paracentesis and non-paracentesis groups, respectively (HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.64-1.24; p = 0.492). No serious adverse events occurred in the paracentesis group.
Paracentesis does not negatively affect the survival of patients with cancer and MA and can be a standard treatment in palliative care settings.
腹腔穿刺术是恶性腹水(MA)最广泛应用的治疗方法之一。然而,MA患者进行腹腔穿刺术可能会产生缩短寿命的影响。因此,本研究旨在调查腹腔穿刺术是否会影响此类患者的生存时间。
我们对一项前瞻性多中心观察性研究进行了事后分析,该研究调查了入住日本23个姑息治疗单位的晚期癌症患者的死亡过程和临终关怀。比较了进行腹腔穿刺术的患者(腹腔穿刺术组)和未进行腹腔穿刺术的患者(非腹腔穿刺术组)的生存时间。我们使用治疗权重的逆概率(IPTW)来控制组间的基线协变量。
在最初纳入的1896例患者中,568例有腹水的患者被纳入研究队列。85例(15.0%)患者接受了腹腔穿刺术。原发肿瘤部位为胰腺(51.9%,n = 295),其次是胃肠道(22.7%,n = 129)。腹腔穿刺术组和非腹腔穿刺术组未经调整的中位生存时间分别为22天(95%置信区间[CI]:16 - 25)和12天(95%CI:11 - 13)(风险比[HR]:0.69,95%CI:0.54 - 0.88;p = 0.003)。IPTW调整后的腹腔穿刺术组和非腹腔穿刺术组中位生存时间分别为22天(95%CI:16 - 25)和16天(95%CI:12 - 22)(HR:0.89,95%CI:0.64 - 1.24;p = 0.492)。腹腔穿刺术组未发生严重不良事件。
腹腔穿刺术不会对癌症合并MA患者的生存产生负面影响,可作为姑息治疗环境中的标准治疗方法。