Suppr超能文献

两种先进的混合闭环系统在 1 型糖尿病儿童中的比较:一项真实世界的观察性研究。

Comparison of two advanced hybrid closed loop in a pediatric population with type 1 diabetes: a real-life observational study.

机构信息

Diabetes Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Piazza S Onofrio, 4, 00165, Rome, Italy.

Pediatric Department, Siena University, Siena, Italy.

出版信息

Acta Diabetol. 2022 Jul;59(7):959-964. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01886-z. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Advanced Hybrid Closed Loop (AHCL) systems have provided the potential to ameliorate glucose control in children with Type 1 Diabetes. The aim of the present work was to compare metabolic control obtained with 2 AHCL systems (Medtronic 780G system and Tandem Control IQ system) in a pediatric real-life clinical context.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

It is an observational, real-life, monocentric study; thirty one children and adolescents (M:F = 15:16, age range 7.6-18 years, mean age 13.05 ± 2.4 years, Diabetes duration > 1 year) with T1D, previously treated with Predictive Low Glucose Suspend (PLGS) systems and then upgraded to AHCL have been enrolled. CGM data of the last four weeks of "PLGS system" (PRE period) with the first four weeks of AHCL system (POST period) have been compared.

RESULTS

For both AHCL systems, Medtronic 780G and Tandem Control IQ, respectively TIR at 4 weeks significantly increased, from 65.7 to 70.5% (p < 0.01) and from 64.8 to 70.1% (p < 0.01). (p < 0.01). The comparison between CGM metrics of the 2 evaluated systems doesn't show difference at baseline (last four weeks of PLGS system) and after four weeks of AHCL use.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study is the first real-life one comparing 2 AHCL systems in a pediatric population with T1D. It shows an improvement in glucose control when upgrading to AHCL. The comparison between the two AHCL systems did not show significant differences in the analyzed CGM metrics, meaning that the algorithms currently available are equally effective in promoting glucose control.

摘要

目的

高级混合闭环 (AHCL) 系统为改善 1 型糖尿病儿童的血糖控制提供了潜力。本研究旨在比较两种 AHCL 系统(美敦力 780G 系统和 Tandem Control IQ 系统)在儿科真实临床环境中的代谢控制效果。

研究设计和方法

这是一项观察性、真实生活、单中心研究;共纳入 31 名儿童和青少年(男:女=15:16,年龄范围 7.6-18 岁,平均年龄 13.05±2.4 岁,糖尿病病程>1 年),他们此前使用过预测性低血糖暂停(PLGS)系统治疗,然后升级为 AHCL。比较了“PLGS 系统”最后四周(PRE 期)和 AHCL 系统前四周(POST 期)的 CGM 数据。

结果

对于两种 AHCL 系统,美敦力 780G 和 Tandem Control IQ,TIR 在 4 周时分别显著增加,从 65.7%增加到 70.5%(p<0.01)和从 64.8%增加到 70.1%(p<0.01)。(p<0.01)。在基线(PLGS 系统的最后四周)和使用 AHCL 四周后,两种评估系统的 CGM 指标之间的比较没有差异。

结论

据我们所知,这是第一项在 1 型糖尿病儿童中比较两种 AHCL 系统的真实研究。它表明,当升级到 AHCL 时,血糖控制得到了改善。两种 AHCL 系统之间的比较在分析的 CGM 指标上没有显示出显著差异,这意味着目前可用的算法在促进血糖控制方面同样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验