Headache Clinic, IRCCS Neuromed, Pozzilli, IS, Italy.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland, OH.
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2022 Jun;28(6):645-656. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2022.21375. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
Patients with migraine, particularly with multiple prior preventive treatment failures, often have high rates of acute headache medication use and are at risk for overuse (acute or symptomatic headache medication use between 10 and 15 days per month [depending on the medication] for > 3 months). Furthermore, these patients have greater health care resource utilization (HCRU). To examine acute headache medication use and HCRU with galcanezumab compared with placebo in a population with multiple prior migraine preventive treatment failures. In the 3-month double-blind phase, patients with episodic or chronic migraine and treatment failures to 2 to 4 standard-of-care migraine preventive categories (lack of effectiveness or safety/tolerability) received galcanezumab 120 mg/month (following a 240-mg loading dose) or placebo; an optional 3 month open-label phase followed. Acute headache medication use (monthly days with acute headache medication utilization) was self-reported daily. The change from baseline in monthly days with acute headache medication used a mixed-model repeated measures analysis. HCRU was reported at baseline (for the previous 6 months) and at monthly visits. Migraine-related HCRU rates were evaluated in the total population per 100 patient-years. Of the 462 patients (galcanezumab n=232, placebo n=230), baseline mean days/month of acute headache medication was 12.3; 44.8% had acute headache medication overuse. Across months 1-3, least squares (LS) mean reductions in acute headache medication use were greater for the galcanezumab group (4.2) compared with placebo (0.9); the LS mean difference was 3.4 (95% CI = 2.7-4.1; < 0.0001). Greater reductions in the galcanezumab group were observed as early as month 1; statistical separation continued at months 2 and 3 (all < 0.0001). During the open-label phase, reductions from baseline ranged from 4.7 to 5.3 days and were similar in patients who transitioned from placebo to patients continuing galcanezumab. Reductions from baseline of migraine-specific health care visits (double-blind phase) were numerically greater with galcanezumab than placebo (215.5 vs 155.3). Patients switching to galcanezumab had reductions (212.9 days) similar to patients continuing galcanezumab (222.6 days). Migraine-specific emergency department visits decreased by two-thirds at month 3 in the galcanezumab group compared with nearly no reduction in the placebo group that experienced a similar reduction during the open-label phase. For both groups, migraine-specific hospitalizations were less than 2 per 100 patient-years. These results demonstrate that galcanezumab has the potential to reduce acute headache medication use and overuse and HCRU in patients with prior migraine preventive treatment failures. Data were presented in part as a poster presentation at the 14th European Headache Congress (European Headache Federation), Virtual Meeting, July 3-5, 2020. Dr Ambrosini is on the advisory board for Eli Lilly and Company and received honorarium from Teva, Novartis, and Eli Lilly and Company. Dr Estemalik is on the advisory boards for Eli Lilly and Company, Lundbeck, and Allergan and the speakers' bureau for Teva, Lundbeck, Eli Lilly and Company, Allergan, and Biohaven. He received consulting fees from Eli Lilly and Company, Teva, Lundbeck, and Allergan and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly and Company, Allergan, Biohaven, Teva, and Lundbeck. Dr Pascual received research support from Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Ministry of Economy, Spain. He was also on advisory boards for Allergan, Amgen-Novartis, Eli Lilly and Company, and Stendhal and received consulting fees or honoraria from Allegan, Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis-Amgen, and Teva. Dr Rettiganti is an employee of Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries, Indianapolis, IN. She is also a minor stock and restricted stockholder of Eli Lilly and Company. Mr. Stroud and Ms. Day are employees of Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries, Indianapolis, IN. Dr Ford is an employee of and holds stock of Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries, Indianapolis, IN. She also received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Eli Lilly and Company.
患者偏头痛,特别是多次预防治疗失败的患者,经常有高频率使用急性头痛药物和过度使用(每月 10-15 天[取决于药物]超过 3 个月的急性或症状性头痛药物使用)的风险。此外,这些患者有更多的医疗保健资源利用(HCRU)。为了研究加奈珠单抗与安慰剂相比在多次偏头痛预防治疗失败的人群中的急性头痛药物使用和 HCRU。在 3 个月的双盲阶段,有发作性或慢性偏头痛且对 2-4 种标准的偏头痛预防类药物(无效或安全性/耐受性)失败的患者接受加奈珠单抗 120 毫克/月(在 240 毫克负荷剂量后)或安慰剂;随后进行可选的 3 个月开放标签阶段。急性头痛药物使用(每月使用急性头痛药物的天数)每天由患者自行报告。每月使用急性头痛药物天数的变化采用混合模型重复测量分析。在基线时(前 6 个月)和每月就诊时报告 HCRU。偏头痛相关的 HCRU 率按每 100 患者年评估。在 462 名患者(加奈珠单抗 n=232,安慰剂 n=230)中,基线时每月急性头痛药物使用的平均天数为 12.3;44.8%的患者有急性头痛药物过度使用。在第 1-3 个月期间,加奈珠单抗组的急性头痛药物使用量较安慰剂组(4.2 对 0.9)显著减少;LS 均值差异为 3.4(95%CI=2.7-4.1;<0.0001)。在第 1 个月就观察到加奈珠单抗组的减少幅度更大;在第 2 个月和第 3 个月持续出现统计学分离(均<0.0001)。在开放标签阶段,从基线的减少范围为 4.7 至 5.3 天,在从安慰剂转为继续使用加奈珠单抗的患者中相似。在双盲阶段,与安慰剂相比,偏头痛特异性医疗保健就诊的减少(215.5 对 155.3)在数值上更大。转用加奈珠单抗的患者(212.9 天)与继续使用加奈珠单抗的患者(222.6 天)相似。与安慰剂组相比,加奈珠单抗组在第 3 个月时偏头痛特异性急诊就诊减少了三分之二,而安慰剂组在开放标签阶段经历了类似的减少,但减少幅度不大。两组的偏头痛特异性住院率均低于每 100 患者年 2 次。这些结果表明,加奈珠单抗有可能减少偏头痛预防治疗失败患者的急性头痛药物使用和过度使用以及 HCRU。这些数据在第 14 届欧洲头痛大会(欧洲头痛联合会)虚拟会议上以海报形式展示,会议时间为 2020 年 7 月 3 日至 5 日。安布罗西尼博士是礼来公司的顾问委员会成员,并从梯瓦、诺华和礼来公司获得酬金。埃斯特马利克博士是礼来公司、Lundbeck 和 Allergan 的顾问委员会成员,也是 Teva、Lundbeck、礼来公司和 Allergan 的发言人。他从礼来公司、Teva、Lundbeck 和 Allergan 获得咨询费,并获得礼来公司、Allergan、Biohaven、Teva 和 Lundbeck 的会议和/或旅行支持。帕斯卡博士获得了西班牙卫生部的卡洛斯三世研究所的研究支持。他还担任 Allergan、Amgen-Novartis、Eli Lilly and Company 和 Stendhal 的顾问委员会成员,并从 Allegan、Eli Lilly and Company、Novartis-Amgen 和 Teva 获得咨询费或酬金。雷蒂根蒂博士是礼来公司及其子公司之一的员工,印第安纳波利斯,IN。她也是 Allergan、Eli Lilly and Company、Novartis-Amgen 和 Teva 的小股东和受限股股东。斯特劳德先生和戴女士是礼来公司及其子公司之一的员工,印第安纳波利斯,IN。福特博士是 Eli Lilly and Company 的员工,并持有 Eli Lilly and Company 及其子公司之一的股票,印第安纳波利斯,IN。她还获得了礼来公司的会议和/或旅行支持。