• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Multiple-Breath Washout Outcome Measures in Adults with Bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症成人的多次呼吸冲洗结局测量。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1489-1497. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-584OC.
2
Multiple-breath inert gas washout and spirometry versus structural lung disease in cystic fibrosis.囊性纤维化患者的多呼吸惰性气体冲洗和肺量测定与结构性肺病的关系
Thorax. 2008 Feb;63(2):129-34. doi: 10.1136/thx.2007.077784. Epub 2007 Aug 3.
3
Feasibility and challenges of using multiple breath washout in COPD.慢性阻塞性肺疾病中使用多次呼气冲洗的可行性与挑战
Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2018 Jul 10;13:2113-2119. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S164285. eCollection 2018.
4
Pulmonary Dysfunction after Treatment for Childhood Cancer. Comparing Multiple-Breath Washout with Spirometry.儿童癌症治疗后的肺功能障碍。比较多次呼吸冲洗与肺量测定。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2021 Feb;18(2):281-289. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202003-211OC.
5
Multiple breath washout: A new and promising lung function test for patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.多次呼吸冲洗:一种用于特发性肺纤维化患者的新型且有前途的肺功能测试。
Respirology. 2018 Aug;23(8):764-770. doi: 10.1111/resp.13294. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
6
Comparison of Multiple Breath Washout and Spirometry in Children with Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia and Cystic Fibrosis and Healthy Controls.原发性纤毛运动障碍和囊性纤维化患儿与健康对照者的多次呼吸冲洗和肺量测定比较。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2020 Sep;17(9):1085-1093. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201905-375OC.
7
Residual volume/total lung capacity ratio confers limited additive significance to lung clearance index for assessment of adults with bronchiectasis.残气量/肺总量比值对评估支气管扩张症成人患者的肺清除指数的附加意义有限。
PLoS One. 2017 Sep 8;12(9):e0183779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183779. eCollection 2017.
8
The validity of shortened multiple-breath washout testing using sulfur hexafluoride in the assessment of patients with COPD.使用六氟化硫进行的缩短版多次呼吸洗脱试验在慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者评估中的有效性。
ERJ Open Res. 2021 Aug 2;7(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00379-2020. eCollection 2021 Jul.
9
A systematic review of lung clearance index in non-cystic fibrosis, non-primary ciliary dyskinesia bronchiectasis.非囊性纤维化、非原发性纤毛运动障碍支气管扩张症肺清除指数的系统评价。
Respir Med. 2022 Sep;201:106937. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2022.106937. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Quality control for multiple breath washout tests in multicentre bronchiectasis studies: Experiences from the BRONCH-UK clinimetrics study.多中心支气管扩张症研究中多次呼吸冲洗试验的质量控制:BRONCH-UK 临床研究的经验。
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Nov 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Multiple-breath washout is more sensitive than spirometry to detect lung function impairment in children and adults with bronchiectasis.多次呼吸洗脱法在检测支气管扩张症儿童和成人的肺功能损害方面比肺量测定法更敏感。
ERJ Open Res. 2025 Jun 23;11(3). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00987-2024. eCollection 2025 May.
2
Advancing the understanding and treatment of lung pathologies associated with alpha 1 antitrypsin deficiency.增进对与α1抗胰蛋白酶缺乏症相关的肺部病变的理解和治疗。
Ther Adv Respir Dis. 2025 Jan-Dec;19:17534666251318841. doi: 10.1177/17534666251318841.
3
Proximal and Distal Bronchioles Contribute to the Pathogenesis of Non-Cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.近端和远端细支气管在非囊性纤维化支气管扩张症的发病机制中起作用。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 15;209(4):374-389. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202306-1093OC.
4
Clinimetric Properties of Outcome Measures in Bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症结局测量的临床计量学特性。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2023 May;20(5):648-659. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202206-493OC.
5
Monitoring disease progression in childhood bronchiectasis.监测儿童支气管扩张症的疾病进展
Front Pediatr. 2022 Sep 16;10:1010016. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.1010016. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Multiple breath washout: measuring early manifestations of lung pathology.多次呼气冲洗法:测量肺部病变的早期表现
Breathe (Sheff). 2021 Sep;17(3):210016. doi: 10.1183/20734735.0016-2021.
2
Correction of sensor crosstalk error in Exhalyzer D multiple-breath washout device significantly impacts outcomes in children with cystic fibrosis.纠正 Exhalyzer D 多呼吸冲洗装置中的传感器串扰误差,显著影响囊性纤维化儿童的治疗结果。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 Sep 1;131(3):1148-1156. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00338.2021. Epub 2021 Aug 5.
3
Further considerations on normative data for multiple breath washout outcomes.关于多次呼气洗脱结果的标准数据的进一步思考。
Eur Respir J. 2021 Apr 22;57(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.04536-2020. Print 2021 Apr.
4
Multiple breath washout in bronchiectasis clinical trials: is it feasible?支气管扩张症临床试验中的多次呼吸洗脱:是否可行?
ERJ Open Res. 2020 Oct 13;6(4). doi: 10.1183/23120541.00363-2019. eCollection 2020 Oct.
5
Normative data for multiple breath washout outcomes in school-aged Caucasian children.学龄期白种儿童多次呼气洗脱结果的正常数据。
Eur Respir J. 2020 Apr 3;55(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.01302-2019. Print 2020 Apr.
6
Australian adults with bronchiectasis: The first report from the Australian Bronchiectasis Registry.澳大利亚支气管扩张症成人患者:来自澳大利亚支气管扩张症登记处的首份报告。
Respir Med. 2019 Aug;155:97-103. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.07.016. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
7
Airway clearance, mucoactive therapies and pulmonary rehabilitation in bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症中的气道清除、黏液溶解治疗和肺康复。
Respirology. 2019 Mar;24(3):227-237. doi: 10.1111/resp.13459. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
8
British Thoracic Society Guideline for bronchiectasis in adults.英国胸科学会成人支气管扩张指南。
Thorax. 2019 Jan;74(Suppl 1):1-69. doi: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212463.
9
Quality control for multiple breath washout tests in multicentre bronchiectasis studies: Experiences from the BRONCH-UK clinimetrics study.多中心支气管扩张症研究中多次呼吸冲洗试验的质量控制:BRONCH-UK 临床研究的经验。
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:206-211. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.030. Epub 2018 Nov 1.
10
A comprehensive approach to lung function in bronchiectasis.支气管扩张症肺功能的综合评估方法。
Respir Med. 2018 Dec;145:120-129. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2018.10.031. Epub 2018 Nov 2.

支气管扩张症成人的多次呼吸冲洗结局测量。

Multiple-Breath Washout Outcome Measures in Adults with Bronchiectasis.

机构信息

Wellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2022 Sep;19(9):1489-1497. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-584OC.

DOI:10.1513/AnnalsATS.202006-584OC
PMID:35451922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9447383/
Abstract

Lung clearance index (LCI) has good intravisit repeatability with better sensitivity in detecting lung disease on computed tomography scan compared with forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV) in adults with bronchiectasis. Alternative multiple-breath washout parameters have not been systematically studied in bronchiectasis. To determine the validity, repeatability, sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility of standard LCI (LCI), shortened LCI (LCI), ventilation heterogeneity arising within proximal conducting airways (SVT), and ventilation heterogeneity arising within the acinar airways (SVT) in a cross-sectional observational cohort of adults with bronchiectasis. Cross-sectional multiple-breath nitrogen washout data (Exhalyzer D; Eco Medics AG) from 132 patients with bronchiectasis across five United Kingdom centers (BronchUK Clinimetrics study) and 88 healthy control subjects were analyzed. Within-test repeatability (mean coefficient of variation) was <5% for both LCI and LCI in patients with bronchiectasis, and there was no difference in mean coefficient of variation for LCI and LCI in patients with bronchiectasis compared with healthy volunteers. Moderate-strength correlations were seen between FEV and LCI ( = -0.54), LCI ( = -0.53), SVT ( = -0.35), and SVT ( = -0.38) -scores. The proportion of subjects with abnormal multiple-breath washout (-score > 2) but in normal FEV (-score < -2) was 42% (LCI) and 36% (LCI). Overall results from the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that LCI had the greatest combined sensitivity and specificity to discriminate between bronchiectasis and control subjects, followed by LCI, FEV, and SVT -scores. There was a 57% time saving with LCI. LCI and LCI had good within-test repeatability and superior sensitivity compared with spirometry measures in differentiating between health and bronchiectasis disease. LCI is quicker and more feasible than LCI. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02468271).

摘要

肺清除指数 (LCI) 在检测支气管扩张症患者 CT 扫描中的肺部疾病方面具有较好的日内可重复性,且比第 1 秒用力呼气量 (FEV1) 更敏感。替代的多次呼吸冲洗参数尚未在支气管扩张症中进行系统研究。本研究旨在确定标准 LCI (LCI)、缩短 LCI (LCI)、近端传导气道内通气异质性 (SVT) 和腺泡气道内通气异质性 (SVT) 在支气管扩张症成人横断面观察队列中的有效性、可重复性、敏感性、特异性和可行性。分析了来自英国五个中心(BronchUK Clinimetrics 研究)的 132 例支气管扩张症患者和 88 例健康对照者的多呼吸氮冲洗数据(Exhalyzer D;Eco Medics AG)。支气管扩张症患者的 LCI 和 LCI 的日内重复性(平均变异系数)均<5%,支气管扩张症患者的 LCI 和 LCI 的平均变异系数无差异。FEV1 与 LCI( = -0.54)、LCI( = -0.53)、SVT( = -0.35)和 SVT( = -0.38)评分之间存在中度相关性。在正常 FEV1(-score<−2)但存在异常多次呼吸冲洗(-score>2)的患者中,有 42%(LCI)和 36%(LCI)。受试者工作特征曲线分析的总体结果表明,LCI 对区分支气管扩张症和对照组具有最大的敏感性和特异性,其次是 LCI、FEV1 和 SVT 评分。LCI 可节省 57%的时间。LCI 和 LCI 在区分健康和支气管扩张症疾病方面具有较好的日内可重复性和优于肺量计测量的敏感性。LCI 比 LCI 更快、更可行。该研究已在 www.clinicaltrials.gov 注册(NCT02468271)。