From the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Emergency Medicine, University of Rwanda, Kigali, Rwanda.
Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Ottawa and The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Anesth Analg. 2022 Oct 1;135(4):820-828. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000006053. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
Many studies address anesthesia provider burnout in high-income countries; however, there is a paucity of data on burnout for anesthesia providers in low-income countries (LICs). Our objectives were (1) to evaluate the prevalence of burnout among anesthesia providers in Rwandan hospitals and (2) to determine factors associated with burnout among anesthesia providers in Rwandan hospitals.
A questionnaire was sent to selected Rwandan anesthesia providers working in public hospitals. The questionnaire assessed burnout using the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey, a validated 22-item survey used to measure burnout among health professionals. Sociodemographic and work-related factors found to be associated with burnout were also assessed using logistic regression in a Bayesian framework to estimate odds ratios (OR) and associated credible intervals (CrIs).
Surveys were distributed to 137 Rwandan anesthesia providers; 99 (72.3%) were returned. Sixty-six (67%) respondents were nonphysician anesthesia providers. Burnout was present in 26 of 99 (26.3%) participants (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.9-36.1). When considering weakly informative priors, we found a 99% probability that not having the right team (OR, 5.36%; 95 CrI, 1.34-23.53) and the frequency of seeing patients with negative outcomes such as death or permanent disability (OR, 9.62; 95% CrI, 2.48-42.84) were associated with burnout.
In a cross-sectional survey of anesthesia providers in Rwanda, more than a quarter of respondents met the criteria for burnout. Lacking the right team and seeing negative outcomes were associated with higher burnout rate. These identified factors should be addressed to prevent the negative consequences of burnout, such as poor patient outcomes.
许多研究都关注高收入国家的麻醉师职业倦怠问题;然而,关于低收入国家(LICs)麻醉师职业倦怠的数据却很少。我们的目标是:(1)评估卢旺达医院麻醉师的职业倦怠发生率;(2)确定卢旺达医院麻醉师职业倦怠的相关因素。
向卢旺达公立医院工作的选定麻醉师发送问卷。该问卷使用 Maslach 职业倦怠量表(MBI)进行评估,这是一种经过验证的 22 项量表,用于衡量卫生专业人员的职业倦怠情况。还使用贝叶斯框架下的逻辑回归评估了与职业倦怠相关的社会人口学和工作相关因素,以估计优势比(OR)和相关可信区间(CrI)。
共向 137 名卢旺达麻醉师分发了问卷,其中 99 名(72.3%)进行了回复。66 名(67%)受访者是非医师麻醉师。99 名参与者中有 26 名(26.3%)存在职业倦怠(95%置信区间 [CI],17.9-36.1)。考虑到弱信息先验,我们有 99%的概率认为没有合适的团队(OR,5.36%;95% CrI,1.34-23.53)和看到患者出现死亡或永久性残疾等负面结果的频率(OR,9.62;95% CrI,2.48-42.84)与职业倦怠相关。
在对卢旺达麻醉师进行的横断面调查中,超过四分之一的受访者符合职业倦怠标准。缺乏合适的团队和看到负面结果与更高的职业倦怠率相关。应解决这些确定的因素,以防止职业倦怠的负面后果,如患者预后不良。