Department of Psychology, University of Toronto.
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Mississauga.
Psychol Sci. 2022 May;33(5):816-829. doi: 10.1177/09567976211055375. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
Visual information around us is rarely static. To perform a task in such a dynamic environment, we often have to compare current visual input with our working memory (WM) representation of the immediate past. However, little is known about what happens to a WM representation when it is compared with perceptual input. To test this, we asked young adults ( = 170 total in three experiments) to compare a new visual input with a WM representation prior to reporting the WM representation. We found that the perceptual comparison biased the WM report, especially when the input was subjectively similar to the WM representation. Furthermore, using computational modeling and individual-differences analyses, we found that this similarity-induced memory bias was driven by representational integration, rather than incidental confusion, between the WM representation and subjectively similar input. Together, our findings highlight a novel source of WM distortion and suggest a general mechanism that determines how WM interacts with new visual input.
我们周围的视觉信息很少是静态的。为了在这样一个动态环境中执行任务,我们通常不得不将当前的视觉输入与对过去瞬间的工作记忆(WM)表示进行比较。然而,对于 WM 表示在与感知输入进行比较时会发生什么,我们知之甚少。为了检验这一点,我们要求年轻成年人(三个实验共 170 人)在报告 WM 表示之前,将新的视觉输入与 WM 表示进行比较。我们发现,感知比较会使 WM 报告产生偏差,尤其是当输入在主观上与 WM 表示相似时。此外,通过计算建模和个体差异分析,我们发现这种由相似性引起的记忆偏差是由 WM 表示与主观相似输入之间的表示整合驱动的,而不是偶然的混淆。总之,我们的研究结果强调了 WM 失真的一个新来源,并提出了一个通用机制,该机制决定了 WM 如何与新的视觉输入相互作用。