Laboratory of Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, Federal University of Parana. Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Graduate Program of Microbiology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Parana, UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Laboratory of Veterinary Clinical Parasitology, Federal University of Parana. Curitiba, PR, Brazil; Graduate Program of Microbiology, Parasitology and Pathology, Federal University of Parana, UFPR, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.
Parasitol Int. 2022 Aug;89:102588. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2022.102588. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
Strategic helminth control in adult cattle would hardly impose sufficient selection pressure to parasite populations but reports of resistance against macrocyclic lactone (ML) based-products have been confirmed worldwide. The objective of this study was to evaluate the scientific literature of ML resistance (< 90.0% efficiency) in helminths of cattle from 2001 (the first report) to 2020 in Brazil. Additional to the data, we studied the correlation of parasite control practices based on a questionnaire given to 32 farmers. The search returned 246 reports and 21 full articles were selected. From these, a Wordcloud and a Keyword Co-occurrence Network graph were created. The published data revealed that most of the studies (19/21) reported multi-species (Cooperia spp., Haemonchus sp., Oesophagostomum radiatum, Trichostrongylus sp.) resistance to ML. None of the reports described the treatment frequency in the tested farms. As for the questionnaire, the majority of farmers (> 70.0%) responded that they rotate products after treatment, animals are treated monthly or biweekly (58.0%), treatments are based on visual evaluation (coat condition, ectoparasite infestation), and that in 94.0% of the times farmers treat all animals. Moreover, farmers use ML in association with potent acaricides (cypermethrin, chlorpyriphos, fluazuron) in more than 90.0% of the times (15/16). It was observed that this regimen was used to prevent and control the cattle-tick Rhipicephalus microplus (90.0%) and the horn-fly, Haematobia irritans (30.0%) infestations. We conclude that the most important factor for nematode resistance was the high level of ML exposure of up to 16 times/year, in combination with acaricides to control ticks and to a lesser extent to control horn-flies. Therefore, selection of helminth populations in cattle in Brazil can be considered secondary to ectoparasite control. The present analysis is critical, as one the most widespread recommendations to avoid drug resistance is to reduce the use of long-acting compounds, due to their extended persistent periods, increasing parasite selection. Moreover, a more serious attitude must be taken regarding parasite control strategies for livestock, reinforcing that health protocols should be based on single acaricidal products whenever possible. Complementary, selective evaluations based on transient threshold population abundance must be enforced to reduce treatment frequency, reducing parasite selection and animal distress.
在成年牛中进行策略性驱虫控制几乎不会对寄生虫种群施加足够的选择压力,但全世界都有报道称对大环内酯(ML)类产品有抗药性。本研究的目的是评估 2001 年(首次报告)至 2020 年巴西牛寄生虫中 ML 耐药性(效率<90.0%)的科学文献。除了数据,我们还根据 32 位农民的问卷调查研究了寄生虫控制实践的相关性。搜索返回了 246 份报告,其中有 21 份完整的文章被选中。从这些文章中,我们创建了一个 Wordcloud 和一个关键字共现网络图。已发表的数据显示,大多数研究(19/21)报告了对 ML 的多物种(Cooperia spp.、Haemonchus sp.、Oesophagostomum radiatum、Trichostrongylus sp.)耐药性。没有一份报告描述了在受测试农场中治疗的频率。至于调查问卷,大多数农民(>70.0%)回答说,他们在治疗后会轮换产品,动物每月或每两周治疗一次(58.0%),治疗基于视觉评估(皮毛状况、外寄生虫感染),并且在 94.0%的情况下,农民会治疗所有动物。此外,农民在超过 90.0%的时间(15/16)中将 ML 与有效的杀螨剂(氯菊酯、毒死蜱、氟虫脲)联合使用。观察到这种方案用于预防和控制牛蜱 Rhipicephalus microplus(90.0%)和牛角蝇 Haematobia irritans(30.0%)的感染。我们得出的结论是,线虫耐药性的最重要因素是高达 16 倍/年的 ML 暴露水平,再加上杀螨剂,以控制蜱,而控制牛角蝇的程度较小。因此,巴西牛寄生虫种群的选择可以被认为是次要的,以控制外寄生虫。目前的分析是至关重要的,因为避免耐药性的最广泛建议之一是减少长效化合物的使用,因为它们的持续时间较长,增加了寄生虫的选择。此外,必须对牲畜寄生虫控制策略采取更严肃的态度,加强健康协议应尽可能基于单一杀螨产品。此外,还必须执行基于瞬态阈值种群丰度的选择性评估,以减少治疗频率,从而减少寄生虫的选择和动物的压力。