• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

癫痫患者生活影响量表(PIES)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。

Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the personal impact of epilepsy scale (PIES).

机构信息

Hartford HealthCare, 85 Seymour St, Hartford, CT 06102, United States; Norton Neuroscience Institute, 4915 Norton Healthcare Blvd, Louisville, KY 40241, United States.

Stanford University School of Medicine, 213 Quarry Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304, United States.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2022 May;130:108691. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108691. Epub 2022 Apr 19.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108691
PMID:35453042
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES) assesses patient functional status in subscales of (1) seizure impact, (2) medication effects, (3) mood & social status, and (4) overall quality of life. This study was designed to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Change (MCID) in PIES subscale and total scores that demonstrate improvement.

METHODS

To ascertain the correspondence of PIES score change and clinical status change (improved, same, worse) in each PIES subscale and total score, we used two distinct retrospective anchor-based assessments of clinical status (patient self-assessment and trained rater assessment) across two clinic visits. Mean PIES scores were compared between clinical status groups, controlling for days between visits and initial clinical status. Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale score change was quantified for each group to determine MCID. A small prospective proof-of-concept study was conducted in a separate subject group.

RESULTS

Patient self-report anchor analysis demonstrated lower (better) PIES scores in the "improved" group vs the "worse" group on the mood & social subscale (p < .001) and total score (p = .002), with a similar trend on the seizure subscale (p = 0.056). Clinical rater anchor analysis demonstrated lower PIES scores in the "improved" vs "worse" group in the mood & social subscale (p = .029) and a trend in total score (p = .082). For the "improved" group, the reduction in PIES scores between visits averaged across both anchor analyses was 8.14% for subscales and 8.67% for total score.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Reduction of 8% on a PIES subscale or total score indicates meaningful improvement in patient clinical status, and is designated the MCID for this instrument. Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale can be useful in day-to-day clinical care and as an outcome metric in clinical research.

摘要

简介

个人癫痫影响量表(PIES)评估了患者在(1)癫痫发作影响、(2)药物作用、(3)情绪和社会地位以及(4)整体生活质量等分方面的功能状态。本研究旨在确定 PIES 量表分和总分中显示改善的最小临床重要变化(MCID)。

方法

为了确定 PIES 量表评分变化与临床状况变化(改善、相同、恶化)在每个 PIES 量表分和总分中的对应关系,我们使用了两次独立的基于回顾性的临床状态评估(患者自我评估和经过培训的评估者评估),跨越了两次就诊。在控制就诊天数和初始临床状态的情况下,比较了不同临床状态组之间的 PIES 平均得分。为了确定 MCID,对每个组的 PIES 评分变化进行量化。在一个单独的患者组中进行了一项小规模的前瞻性概念验证研究。

结果

患者自我报告的锚定分析显示,在情绪和社会子量表(p <.001)和总分(p =.002)上,“改善”组的 PIES 评分较低(更好),而在“恶化”组中得分较高,在癫痫子量表上也呈现出类似的趋势(p =.056)。临床评估者的锚定分析显示,在情绪和社会子量表(p =.029)和总分上(p =.082),“改善”组的 PIES 评分较低。对于“改善”组,两次就诊之间的 PIES 评分变化在两种锚定分析中的平均值为子量表 8.14%,总分为 8.67%。

讨论/结论:PIES 子量表或总分降低 8%表明患者临床状态有显著改善,这是该工具的 MCID。PIES 可用于日常临床护理,并作为临床研究的结果指标。

相似文献

1
Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the personal impact of epilepsy scale (PIES).癫痫患者生活影响量表(PIES)的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。
Epilepsy Behav. 2022 May;130:108691. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2022.108691. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
2
Assessing the personal impact of epilepsy in a population-based cohort of Veterans.评估退伍军人人群中癫痫的个人影响。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 May;106:107047. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107047. Epub 2020 Apr 1.
3
Turkish validity and reliability of the Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale.土耳其语个人癫痫影响量表的效度和信度。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Dec;125:108352. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.108352. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
4
The Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES).癫痫个人影响量表(PIES)。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Jan;42:140-6. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2014.09.060. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
5
Examination of health literacy and personal impact of epilepsy in patients with epilepsy.对癫痫患者的健康素养和癫痫个人影响的检查。
Epilepsy Behav. 2023 Oct;147:109406. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2023.109406. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
6
Validity of the Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES) in patients with epilepsy in Uganda.乌干达癫痫患者个人影响量表(PIES)的有效性。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 Jan;114(Pt B):107303. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107303. Epub 2020 Jul 25.
7
Minimal clinically important differences in the EORTC QLQ-BM22 and EORTC QLQ-C15-PAL modules in patients with bone metastases undergoing palliative radiotherapy.接受姑息性放疗的骨转移患者中,欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织核心生活质量问卷QLQ-BM22和QLQ-C15-PAL模块的最小临床重要差异
Qual Life Res. 2016 Oct;25(10):2535-2541. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1308-4. Epub 2016 May 2.
8
What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?全膝关节置换术后 WOMAC 指数的最小临床重要差异是多少?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Oct;476(10):2005-2014. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000000444.
9
Assessing health status over time: impact of recall period and anchor question on the minimal clinically important difference of copd health status tools.评估随时间推移的健康状况:回顾期和锚定问题对 COPD 健康状况工具的最小临床重要差异的影响。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jun 26;16(1):130. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0950-7.
10
Minimal clinically important difference of the EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 for worsening peripheral neuropathy in patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy.EORTC QLQ-CIPN20 用于评估接受神经毒性化疗的患者周围神经病变恶化的最小临床重要差异。
Support Care Cancer. 2019 Dec;27(12):4753-4762. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-04771-8. Epub 2019 Apr 10.