Opteran Technologies, Sheffield Innovation Centre, 217 Portobello, Sheffield S1 4DP, United Kingdom.
Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, Macquarie Park, NSW 2109, Australia.
Cognition. 2022 Aug;225:105118. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105118. Epub 2022 Apr 19.
Much of human cognition involves two different types of reasoning that operate together. Type 1 reasoning systems are intuitive and fast, whereas Type 2 reasoning systems are reflective and slow. Why has our cognition evolved with these features? Both systems are coherent and in most ecological circumstances either alone is capable of coming up with the right answer most of the time. Neural tissue is costly, and thus far evolutionary models have struggled to identify a benefit of operating two systems of reasoning. To explore this issue we take a broad comparative perspective. We discuss how dual processes of cognition have enabled the emergence of selective attention in insects, transforming the learning capacities of these animals. Modern AIs using dual systems of learning are able to learn how their vast world works and how best to interact with it, allowing them to exceed human levels of performance in strategy games. We propose that the core benefits of dual processes of reasoning are to narrow down a problem space in order to focus cognitive resources most effectively.
人类的认知活动很大程度上涉及两种不同类型的推理,它们共同发挥作用。第一类推理系统是直观且快速的,而第二类推理系统则是反思性且缓慢的。为什么我们的认知会进化出这些特征呢?这两个系统都是连贯的,在大多数生态环境中,它们中的任何一个都能够独自在大多数情况下得出正确的答案。神经组织是昂贵的,到目前为止,进化模型还难以确定运作两种推理系统的好处。为了探讨这个问题,我们采取了广泛的比较视角。我们讨论了认知的双重过程如何使昆虫的选择性注意得以出现,从而改变了这些动物的学习能力。使用双重学习系统的现代人工智能能够学习它们的广阔世界是如何运作的,以及如何最好地与之互动,从而使它们在策略游戏中的表现超越人类水平。我们提出,推理的双重过程的核心优势是缩小问题空间,以便最有效地集中认知资源。