García-García Marta Teresa, Diz-Dios Pedro, Abeleira-Pazos María Teresa, Limeres-Posse Jacobo, García-Mato Eliane, Varela-Aneiros Iván, Outumuro-Rial Mercedes, Diniz-Freitas Márcio
Medical-Surgical Dentistry Research Group (OMEQUI), Health Research Institute of Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela (USC), 15782 Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Mar 24;11(4):496. doi: 10.3390/biology11040496.
Background: Morphological integration refers to the tendency of anatomical structures to show correlated variations because they develop in response to shared developmental processes or function in concert with other structures. The objective of this study was to determine the relationships between the dimensions of different cranial-cervical-facial structures in patients with Down syndrome (DS). Methodology: The study group consisted of 41 individuals with DS who had undergone cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at the Dental Radiology Unit of the University of Santiago de Compostela (Spain). In the historical archive of this same unit, 41 CBCTs belonging to individuals with no known systemic disorders or severe malformations of the maxillofacial region were selected, forming an age and sex-matched control group. Twenty-nine measurements were performed on each participant’s CBCT images, which were grouped into three blocks: atlantoaxial dimensions, craniovertebral dimensions and cephalometric dimensions. To determine whether there were significant differences between the dimensions obtained in the DS and control groups, we applied multiple analysis of variance and linear discriminant analysis tests. The analysis of the association between blocks (in pairs) was performed with the canonical correlation analysis test. Results: The dimensions evaluated in the three blocks of variables of individuals with DS differ significantly from those of nonsyndromic controls (p < 0.001). The highest discriminative capacity to identify controls and patients with DS was obtained with the cephalometric dimensions (87.5%). With regard to the association between blocks (two-by-two measurements), we found no significant relationship in the DS group. However, we confirmed a statistically significant correlation between all pairs of blocks of variables in the controls, especially between the atlantoaxial and cephalometric dimensions (p < 0.001) and between the craniovertebral and cephalometric dimensions (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our results confirm a very poor morphological integration of the cranial-cervical-maxillary complex in individuals with DS. This finding reinforces the proposal that gene overload enhances the channeling process.
形态整合是指解剖结构因共同的发育过程或与其他结构协同发挥功能而呈现出相关变异的趋势。本研究的目的是确定唐氏综合征(DS)患者不同颅颈面部结构尺寸之间的关系。方法:研究组由41名在西班牙圣地亚哥德孔波斯特拉大学牙科放射科接受锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)的DS患者组成。在同一科室的历史档案中,选取了41例无已知系统性疾病或颌面区域严重畸形个体的CBCT,组成年龄和性别匹配的对照组。对每位参与者的CBCT图像进行了29项测量,这些测量分为三个组块:寰枢椎尺寸、颅椎尺寸和头影测量尺寸。为了确定DS组和对照组获得的尺寸之间是否存在显著差异,我们应用了多因素方差分析和线性判别分析测试。使用典型相关分析测试对组块之间(成对)的关联进行分析。结果:DS个体的三个变量组块中评估的尺寸与非综合征对照组的尺寸有显著差异(p < 0.001)。头影测量尺寸对识别对照组和DS患者具有最高的判别能力(87.5%)。关于组块之间(两两测量)的关联,我们在DS组中未发现显著关系。然而,我们证实对照组中所有变量组块对之间存在统计学显著相关性,特别是寰枢椎尺寸与头影测量尺寸之间(p < 0.001)以及颅椎尺寸与头影测量尺寸之间(p < 0.001)。结论:我们的结果证实DS个体的颅颈上颌复合体形态整合非常差。这一发现强化了基因过载增强通道化过程的观点。