Cárdenas-Torres Feliznando Isidro, Cabrera-Chávez Francisco, Arvizu-Flores Aldo Alejandro, Flores-Mendoza Lilian Karem, Lopez-Teros Veronica, Astiazaran-Garcia Humberto, Gracia-Valenzuela Martina Hilda, Figueroa-Salcido Oscar Gerardo, Arámburo-Gálvez Jesús Gilberto, Ontiveros Noé
Faculty of Nutrition Sciences, Nutrition Sciences Postgraduate Program, University of Sinaloa, Culiacán 80019, Sinaloa, Mexico.
Division of Biological and Health Sciences, Postgraduate Program in Health Sciences, University of Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Sonora, Mexico.
Biology (Basel). 2022 Mar 31;11(4):542. doi: 10.3390/biology11040542.
BALB/c mice can be orally sensitized to food proteins under acid suppressive medication, mimicking human exposure and triggering a human-like allergic immune response. However, the reproducibility of such an oral food allergy model remains questionable. Our aim was to evaluate the IgE responses triggered against ovalbumin (OVA) and cow’s milk proteins (CMP) after intragastric (IG), either under gastric-acid suppression or not, or intraperitoneal (IP) sensitization in BALB/c mice. OVA (0.2 mg) and different concentrations of CMP were administered with/without the antacid sucralfate by the IG route. For IP sensitization, OVA or CMP (0.5 mg) were administered. ELISA was used to evaluate IgE responses. The IP sensitization protocols triggered more robust and consistent anti-OVA or anti-CMP IgE responses than the intragastric ones (with/without sucralfate) (p < 0.05). 2.7% (1/36), and 5.5% (3/54) of the mice that underwent the sucralfate-assisted IG protocol triggered IgE responses against OVA or CMP, respectively. All the mice were administered OVA or CMP via IP triggered detectable IgE responses. The IP sensitization model is more reliable than the IG one for evaluating the intrinsic sensitizing and/or allergenic potential of food proteins, even if IG immunizations are carried out under gastric-acid suppression.
在酸抑制药物作用下,BALB/c小鼠可经口对食物蛋白致敏,模拟人类接触情况并引发类似人类的过敏免疫反应。然而,这种口服食物过敏模型的可重复性仍存在疑问。我们的目的是评估在胃酸抑制或不抑制的情况下,通过胃内(IG)或腹腔内(IP)致敏,BALB/c小鼠针对卵清蛋白(OVA)和牛奶蛋白(CMP)触发的IgE反应。通过IG途径给予OVA(0.2mg)和不同浓度的CMP,同时给予或不给予抗酸剂硫糖铝。对于IP致敏,给予OVA或CMP(0.5mg)。采用ELISA评估IgE反应。与胃内致敏(给予或不给予硫糖铝)相比,IP致敏方案触发的抗OVA或抗CMP IgE反应更强且更一致(p<0.05)。接受硫糖铝辅助IG方案的小鼠中,分别有2.7%(1/36)和5.5%(3/54)触发了针对OVA或CMP的IgE反应。所有通过IP给予OVA或CMP的小鼠均触发了可检测到的IgE反应。即使在胃酸抑制下进行IG免疫,IP致敏模型在评估食物蛋白的内在致敏和/或致敏潜力方面也比IG模型更可靠。