Cummings Mackenzie, Nicolais Olivia, Shahin Mark
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jefferson Abington Hospital, Abington, PA 19001, USA.
Asplundh Cancer Pavilion, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Hanjani Institute for Gynecologic Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Willow Grove, PA 19090, USA.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Apr 14;12(4):988. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040988.
Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.
自20世纪70年代首次应用以来,初次肿瘤细胞减灭术(PDS)一直是唯一具有生存优势的卵巢癌治疗方法。然而,仅在接受了理想切除术的患者中观察到生存优势。对于不太可能接受理想切除术的患者和/或围手术期并发症高风险的合并症患者,新辅助化疗(NACT)已成为一种替代治疗方法。本综述的目的是总结目前关于PDS和NACT治疗Ⅲ/Ⅳ期卵巢癌的证据。我们系统检索了PubMed数据库中的相关文章。2010年之前,NACT仅用于不适合手术的患者。在第一项证明NACT联合间隔期肿瘤细胞减灭术非劣效性的随机试验EORTC 55971发表后,NACT被应用于更多患者。自EORTC 55971以来,3项随机试验——CHORUS、JCOG0602和SCORPION——对NACT与PDS进行了研究。虽然CHORUS支持EORTC 55971的结果,但JCOG0602未能证明非劣效性,SCORPION也未能证明NACT的优越性。尽管数据存在冲突,但一部分患者将从NACT中获益,同时维持生存,包括手术不佳的候选患者和无法手术的疾病患者。需要进一步的随机试验来评估NACT的作用。