Atallah Atallah A, Ismail Elsayed A, Yehia Hany M, Elkhadragy Manal F, Aloufi Abeer S, Gemiel Dalia G
Department of Dairy Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Benha University, Moshtohor 13736, Egypt.
Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agriculture Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Foods. 2022 Apr 12;11(8):1099. doi: 10.3390/foods11081099.
Frozen yogurt is known as ice cream with some properties of yogurt. Frozen yogurts are a rich source of sucrose levels between 15% and 28% of total ingredients. Consumers suffering from lactose intolerance and metabolic syndrome are looking for sugar-free products. The current study investigates the sugar replacements by using sweeteners (stevia, sucralose and sorbitol) on physicochemical, microbiological, microstructural and sensory characteristics of probiotic-frozen yogurt. Four different treatments of probiotic-frozen yogurts were studied (control probiotic-frozen yogurt with sucrose (F1), probiotic-frozen yogurt with stevia (F2), probiotic-frozen yogurt with sucralose (F3) and probiotic-frozen yogurt with sorbitol (F4)). The chemical properties were not significantly present p > 0.05) during storage in all treatments. In the F1 treatment, sucrose value was higher (14.87%) and not detected in the F2, F3 and F4 treatments. The highest values of overrun, hardness and viscosity (p < 0.05) were detected in the F2, F3 and F3 samples, but the lowest value was detected in the F1 treatment. Total Str. thermophilus and Lb. delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus counts were gradually decreased (p < 0.05) during storage periods. At 1 day, the Bifidobacteria counts ranged from 7.56 to 7.60 log10 CFU g−1 in all groups and gradually decreased during storage, but these bacterial counts remained viable (>6.00 log10 CFU g−1) during storage periods up to 60 d. During storage periods, the highest scores of total acceptability were detected in the F3, F4 and F2 treatments. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs of all probiotic-frozen yogurt treatments illustrated that the microstructures showed a difference with a fine network, size pores and structure between the frozen yogurt with sweeteners (F2, F3 and F3) and control frozen yogurt (F1).
冷冻酸奶被认为是具有一些酸奶特性的冰淇淋。冷冻酸奶是蔗糖的丰富来源,蔗糖含量占总成分的15%至28%。患有乳糖不耐受和代谢综合征的消费者正在寻找无糖产品。当前的研究调查了使用甜味剂(甜菊糖苷、三氯蔗糖和山梨醇)替代糖对益生菌冷冻酸奶的物理化学、微生物学、微观结构和感官特性的影响。研究了四种不同处理的益生菌冷冻酸奶(含蔗糖的对照益生菌冷冻酸奶(F1)、含甜菊糖苷的益生菌冷冻酸奶(F2)、含三氯蔗糖的益生菌冷冻酸奶(F3)和含山梨醇的益生菌冷冻酸奶(F4))。在所有处理的储存期间,化学性质均无显著差异(p>0.05)。在F1处理中,蔗糖值较高(14.87%),而在F2、F3和F4处理中未检测到。在F2、F3和F3样品中检测到最高的膨胀率、硬度和粘度值(p<0.05),但在F1处理中检测到最低值。在储存期间,嗜热链球菌和德氏保加利亚乳杆菌的总数逐渐减少(p<0.05)。在第1天,所有组中的双歧杆菌计数范围为7.56至7.60 log10 CFU g−1,并在储存期间逐渐减少,但在长达60天的储存期间,这些细菌计数仍保持存活(>6.00 log10 CFU g−1)。在储存期间,F3、F4和F2处理中检测到的总可接受性得分最高。所有益生菌冷冻酸奶处理的扫描电子显微镜(SEM)显微照片表明,微观结构存在差异,含甜味剂的冷冻酸奶(F2、F3和F3)与对照冷冻酸奶(F1)之间的网络精细度、孔隙大小和结构不同。