Malkawi Wedad A, AlRafayah Enas, AlHazabreh Mohammad, AbuLaila Salam, Al-Ghananeem Abeer M
College of Art and Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40208, USA.
College of Pharmacy, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan.
Children (Basel). 2022 Apr 1;9(4):488. doi: 10.3390/children9040488.
The development of pediatric-specific dose forms is particularly difficult due to a variety of factors relating to pediatric population differences from adult populations. The buccal dosage form is considered a good alternative to oral dosage form if the latter cannot be used in pediatric patients. Both oral and buccal dosage formulations uphold great application qualities for pediatric patients. This review sheds light on both oral and buccal, as they are the most convenient dosage forms for pediatrics. The use of adult drugs to treat children is a legislation concern, as it may result in incorrect dose, safety, and efficacy. The Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act (BPCA) and the Pediatric Research Equity Act (PREA) are two key pieces of legislation that encourage and regulate pediatric medication research. Both contribute to a well-balanced approach to emphasizing critical safety and efficacy warnings for the of medications within pediatric populations. These contributions are what enable companies to continue making significant investments in pediatric drug developments. Despite the importance of investigating medicines for children, there is still a demand for pediatric-specific formulations and dosage forms. Many formulations and dosage forms can be designed, among which the buccal drug delivery seems a good modality for pediatric-friendly dosage forms. The main issues associated with these pediatric dosage forms development, particularly clinical and physiological factors, are discussed in this review. In addition, formulation developments and regulatory expectations are highlighted. In turn, suggestions are made to potentially improve future pediatric formulation development.
由于与儿科人群和成人人群差异相关的多种因素,儿科专用剂型的开发特别困难。如果口服剂型不能用于儿科患者,颊部剂型被认为是一种很好的替代剂型。口服和颊部剂型对儿科患者都具有很好的应用特性。本综述阐明了口服和颊部剂型,因为它们是儿科最方便的剂型。使用成人药物治疗儿童是一个立法问题,因为这可能导致剂量不正确、安全性和有效性问题。《儿童最佳药物法案》(BPCA)和《儿科研究公平法案》(PREA)是鼓励和规范儿科药物研究的两项关键立法。两者都有助于采取一种平衡的方法,强调儿科人群用药的关键安全性和有效性警告。这些贡献使公司能够继续在儿科药物开发方面进行大量投资。尽管研究儿童用药很重要,但对儿科专用制剂和剂型仍有需求。可以设计许多制剂和剂型,其中颊部给药似乎是一种适合儿科的剂型。本综述讨论了与这些儿科剂型开发相关的主要问题,特别是临床和生理因素。此外,还强调了制剂开发和监管期望。相应地,提出了一些建议,以潜在地改进未来的儿科制剂开发。