为什么冲击式按摩疗法不能改善水上救援后的恢复情况？一项针对救生员的初步研究。
Why Percussive Massage Therapy Does Not Improve Recovery after a Water Rescue? A Preliminary Study with Lifeguards.
作者信息
Alonso-Calvete Alejandra, Lorenzo-Martínez Miguel, Pérez-Ferreirós Alexandra, Couso-Bruno Antonio, Carracedo-Rodríguez Eloy, Barcala-Furelos Martín, Barcala-Furelos Roberto, Padrón-Cabo Alexis
机构信息
REMOSS Research Group, Facultade de Ciencias da Educación e do Deporte, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
Facultade de Fisioterapia, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain.
出版信息
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 Apr 7;10(4):693. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10040693.
The aim of this study was to analyze the effects of percussive massage therapy (PMT) on lifeguards’ recovery after a water rescue, in comparison with passive recovery. Methods: A quasi-experimental crossover design was conducted to compare passive recovery (PR) and a PMT protocol. A total of 14 volunteer lifeguards performed a simulated 100 m water rescue and perceived fatigue and blood lactate were measured as recovery variables after the rescue and after the 8-min recovery process. Results: There were no differences between PMT and PR in lactate clearance (p > 0.05), finding in both modalities a small but not significant decrease in blood lactate. In perceived fatigue, both methods decreased this variable significantly (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between them (p > 0.05). Conclusions: PMT does not enhance recovery after a water rescue, in comparison with staying passive. Despite PMT appearing to be adequate for recovery in other efforts, it is not recommended for lifeguards’ recovery after a water rescue.
本研究旨在分析与被动恢复相比，冲击按摩疗法（PMT）对救生员水上救援后恢复情况的影响。方法：采用准实验交叉设计来比较被动恢复（PR）和PMT方案。共有14名志愿者救生员进行了模拟100米水上救援，并在救援后以及8分钟恢复过程后测量了感知疲劳和血乳酸作为恢复变量。结果：PMT和PR在乳酸清除方面没有差异（p>0.05），两种方式的血乳酸均有小幅但不显著的下降。在感知疲劳方面，两种方法均显著降低了该变量（p<0.001），两者之间无显著差异（p>0.05）。结论：与保持被动相比，PMT并不能增强水上救援后的恢复。尽管PMT在其他运动后的恢复中似乎足够，但不建议用于救生员水上救援后的恢复。
Zotero 插件