Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China.
Viruses. 2022 Mar 22;14(4):656. doi: 10.3390/v14040656.
For patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with curative radiofrequency ablation (RFA), the effect of entecavir (ETV) vs. tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) on recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) remains unclear. We aimed to compare the outcomes of patients receiving ETV or TDF after RFA. This study consecutively collected patients who were treated with ETV (n = 202) or TDF (n = 102) for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) after curative RFA of HCC from December 2015 to January 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. There were 130 patients in the ETV group and 77 patients in the TDF group after we performed 1-to-n propensity score matching. Kaplan−Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to validate possible risk factors for RFS and OS. In addition, we estimated the curative effect of ETV and TDF for HBV-related hepatitis by recording the change in serum HBV DNA and ALBI grade after RFA. During the study period (median 34.1 (interquartile range: 19.6−47.4 months) months), 123 (40.5%) patients suffered HCC recurrence, and 15 (4.9%) died. In the full cohort, the probability of HCC recurrence (41.6% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.49) and overall survival (95% vs. 95.1%, p = 0.39) at 5 years were similar between the ETV and TDF groups. In the matched cohort, HCC recurrence (40.8% vs. 40.3%, p = 0.35) and overall survival (96.9% vs. 93.5%, p = 0.12) at 5 years were similar between the ETV and TDF groups. Furthermore, the early RFS (<2 years) did not differ significantly between the two groups in the full and matched cohorts (p = 0.26, p = 0.13). Compared with the ALBI grade before RFA, the ALBI grade of 80 patients (41%) remained stable or improved in the ETV group and 64 patients (64%) in the TDF group (p < 0.001). The mean time of serum HBV DNA reduction to 0 was 9.13 (95% CI: 5.92−12.33) and 2.75 (95% CI: 2.01−3.49) months in the ETV and TDF groups, respectively (p = 0.015). The RFS and OS of patients after curative RFA for HCC were not significantly different between the ETV and TDF groups. TDF therapy was associated with a better effect of protecting liver function and reducing the load of HBV. Further validation studies are needed.
对于接受根治性射频消融 (RFA) 治疗的乙型肝炎病毒 (HBV) 相关肝细胞癌 (HCC) 患者,恩替卡韦 (ETV) 与替诺福韦酯 (TDF) 在无复发生存率 (RFS) 和总生存率 (OS) 方面的效果仍不清楚。我们旨在比较 RFA 后接受 ETV 或 TDF 治疗的患者的结局。本研究连续收集了 2015 年 12 月至 2021 年 1 月中山大学肿瘤防治中心接受 ETV (n = 202) 或 TDF (n = 102) 治疗的慢性乙型肝炎 (CHB) 后接受 HCC 根治性 RFA 的患者。在进行 1 对 n 倾向评分匹配后,ETV 组中有 130 例患者,TDF 组中有 77 例患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 和 Cox 回归分析验证 RFS 和 OS 的可能危险因素。此外,我们通过记录 RFA 后血清 HBV DNA 和 ALBI 分级的变化来估计 ETV 和 TDF 对 HBV 相关肝炎的疗效。在研究期间 (中位 34.1 [四分位距:19.6-47.4 个月] 个月),123 例 (40.5%) 患者发生 HCC 复发,15 例 (4.9%) 患者死亡。在全队列中,ETV 和 TDF 组 5 年 HCC 复发率 (41.6% vs. 37.3%,p = 0.49) 和总生存率 (95% vs. 95.1%,p = 0.39) 相似。在匹配队列中,ETV 和 TDF 组 5 年 HCC 复发率 (40.8% vs. 40.3%,p = 0.35) 和总生存率 (96.9% vs. 93.5%,p = 0.12) 相似。此外,在全队列和匹配队列中,两组的早期 RFS(<2 年) 无显著差异 (p = 0.26,p = 0.13)。与 RFA 前的 ALBI 分级相比,ETV 组 80 例 (41%) 患者和 TDF 组 64 例 (64%) 患者的 ALBI 分级保持稳定或改善 (p < 0.001)。ETV 组和 TDF 组血清 HBV DNA 降低至 0 的平均时间分别为 9.13 (95%CI: 5.92-12.33) 和 2.75 (95%CI: 2.01-3.49) 个月 (p = 0.015)。RFA 根治性治疗 HCC 后,ETV 和 TDF 组患者的 RFS 和 OS 无显著差异。TDF 治疗与保护肝功能和降低 HBV 载量的效果更好有关。需要进一步的验证研究。