• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效

Efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi.

作者信息

Rassweiler J, Lutz K, Gumpinger R, Eisenberger F

出版信息

Eur Urol. 1986;12(6):377-86. doi: 10.1159/000472662.

DOI:10.1159/000472662
PMID:3545848
Abstract

In contrast to the majority of renal calculi, in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for upper ureteral stones is still controversial. Some centers recommend retrograde mobilization of the calculus into the renal pelvis prior to ESWL as a routine procedure (UC + ESWL). To evaluate the efficiency of in situ ESWL for upper ureteric stones, we initiated a prospective clinical trial. From July 1985 to January 1986, 122 patients presented with upper ureteral calculi, necessitating a total of 146 different procedures: 88 in situ ESWL; 31 UC + ESWL; 15 antegrade ureteroscopies (URS); 6 retrograde URS; 2 open surgery (ureterolithotomy, nephrectomy), and 4 patients were managed conservatively. Of all 99 patients treated at the lithotripter, 80 patients received in situ ESWL (no emergency case, no location problems): in 60 patients (75%) the stone could be disintegrated in one session; 8 patients (10%) required a second ESWL session due to partial fragmentation. Retrograde mobilization using a ureteral catheter or URS was necessary in 9 patients due to failure of in situ ESWL (11%) and, in only 3 patients, we had to remove the stone by antegrade URS (4%). In conclusion, 96% of all upper ureteric stones suitable for primary ESWL could be treated by a noninvasive (in situ ESWL) or minimally invasive (UC + ESWL) procedure. Therefore we recommend in situ ESWL for these calculi. Primary retrograde mobilization is only indicated in case of location problems (stone close to the spine, obesity, skeleton deformation) or emergency cases (colic, hydronephrosis). Antegrade URS should be performed if retrograde mobilization fails or in emergency cases (acute pyelonephritis, following percutaneous nephrostomy, after clinical stabilization). The rate of open surgery is below 2%.

摘要

与大多数肾结石不同,上段输尿管结石的原位体外冲击波碎石术(ESWL)仍存在争议。一些中心建议在ESWL之前将结石逆行移入肾盂作为常规操作(输尿管导管插入术 + ESWL)。为了评估原位ESWL治疗上段输尿管结石的有效性,我们开展了一项前瞻性临床试验。1985年7月至1986年1月,122例患者患有上段输尿管结石,共需要进行146种不同的治疗:88例原位ESWL;31例输尿管导管插入术 + ESWL;15例顺行输尿管镜检查(URS);6例逆行URS;2例开放手术(输尿管切开取石术、肾切除术),4例患者采取保守治疗。在接受碎石治疗的所有99例患者中,80例接受原位ESWL(无急诊病例,无位置问题):60例患者(75%)结石可在一次治疗中被击碎;8例患者(10%)因部分破碎需要进行第二次ESWL治疗。由于原位ESWL失败,9例患者(11%)需要使用输尿管导管或URS进行逆行移位,仅3例患者(4%)我们不得不通过顺行URS取出结石。总之,所有适合初次ESWL治疗的上段输尿管结石中,96%可通过无创(原位ESWL)或微创(输尿管导管插入术 + ESWL)方法治疗。因此,我们建议对这些结石采用原位ESWL。仅在存在位置问题(结石靠近脊柱、肥胖、骨骼变形)或急诊病例(绞痛、肾积水)时才进行初次逆行移位。如果逆行移位失败或在急诊病例(急性肾盂肾炎、经皮肾造瘘术后、临床稳定后)中,应进行顺行URS。开放手术率低于2%。

相似文献

1
Efficacy of in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for upper ureteral calculi.原位体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效
Eur Urol. 1986;12(6):377-86. doi: 10.1159/000472662.
2
ESWL for ureteral calculi. Using the Dornier HM 3, HM 3+ and Wolf Piezolith 2,200.
J Urol (Paris). 1990;96(3):149-53.
3
Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy or ureteroscopy as primary treatment for ureteric stones: a retrospective study comparing two different treatment strategies.体外冲击波碎石术或输尿管镜检查作为输尿管结石的主要治疗方法:一项比较两种不同治疗策略的回顾性研究。
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 2006;40(2):113-8. doi: 10.1080/00365590410028683.
4
Minimal invasive therapy of ureteral calculi using modern techniques.使用现代技术对输尿管结石进行微创治疗。
Arch Esp Urol. 1990 Jun;43(5):582-8.
5
[Treatment of ureteral lithiasis with shock waves].[冲击波治疗输尿管结石]
Arch Esp Urol. 2001 Nov;54(9):971-82.
6
Second in situ extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in not disintegrated ureteral stones is preferred to retrograde manipulation.
Urol Int. 1995;55(1):16-8. doi: 10.1159/000282739.
7
Reanalysis of stone manipulation prior to extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy for management of upper ureteral calculi.体外冲击波碎石术前对输尿管上段结石处理的再分析
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei). 2000 Jul;63(7):552-7.
8
Treatment of mid- and lower ureteric calculi: extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy vs laser ureteroscopy. A comparison of costs, morbidity and effectiveness.输尿管中下段结石的治疗:体外冲击波碎石术与激光输尿管镜检查。成本、发病率及有效性的比较
Br J Urol. 1998 Jan;81(1):31-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.1998.00510.x.
9
The scope and place of ultrasound-monitored extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in a multimodality setting and the effects of experiential, audit-evoked changes on the management of ureteric calculi.超声监测下体外冲击波碎石术在多模式治疗中的范围及地位,以及经验性、审核引发的变化对输尿管结石治疗的影响。
Br J Urol. 1994 May;73(5):480-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1994.tb07630.x.
10
Comparison of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy and ureteroscopy in the treatment of ureteral calculi: a prospective study.体外冲击波碎石术与输尿管镜检查治疗输尿管结石的比较:一项前瞻性研究。
Eur Urol. 1999 Nov;36(5):376-9. doi: 10.1159/000020017.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of ureteral stone measurements for predicting the efficacy of a single session of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy: one-, two-, and three-dimensional computed tomography measurements.比较单次体外冲击波碎石术治疗输尿管结石的疗效预测:一维、二维和三维 CT 测量。
Urolithiasis. 2024 Mar 5;52(1):43. doi: 10.1007/s00240-024-01538-7.
2
Extracorporeal lithotripsy and combined surgical procedures in the treatment of renoureteral stone disease: our experience with 2,955 patients.
World J Surg. 1989 Nov-Dec;13(6):765-74; discussion 774-5. doi: 10.1007/BF01658431.
3
ESWL '90--state of the art. Limitations and future trends of shock-wave lithotripsy.
Urol Res. 1990;18 Suppl 1:S13-23. doi: 10.1007/BF00301523.